hypochondriac

Indeed well said. Not that difficult a concept.

He is clearly not staying. Shame but we can enjoy his quality for the rest of the year.

I've had him before. Apparently he was on Twitter. He is fantastic and even better in person.

That is a completely different debate to the one raised by Whelan. He didn't say certain social groups do better than others did he. Any "seeing what I am trying to do" is just your usual paranoia or possibly a bit of guilt. You can decide which.

What did you mean by "it's an interesting debate to be had." what debate?

What debate? Whilst there may be a number of rich people who happen to be Jewish, lumping all Jewish people in together and saying they chase money is ridiculous. Jewish people being overly represented in Parliament is an entirely separate issue. There is no debate about "Jews" chasing more than others, it isn't true.

Oh god no.

The title of this topic hasn't happened much in the recent past!

Ffs. Both Fonte and Davis are important to us but in terms of an asset they would not command anywhere near the fees of the majority of the rest of the squad.

Is Davis was to be sold he would not command anywhere near the fee that the likes of Lallana, wanyama, Shaw, Clyne, pelle, Tadic etc. Why you think that is undermining him is just weird. It's stating a fact.

+1 for the partridge reference.

That won't work forever and besides, the club said that wouldn't be happening again. I do hope we get some of these players signed up though because otherwise we are going to lose a number of the key ones next summer.

Wish these contracts were thrashed out in private. Has anyone of our big names signed a new contract since the new regime came in? Steven Davies yes but not really a big name.

I can't help myself but I end up singing the baby Cambridge version that bearsy introduced.

Surely you would object to that also due to being an atheist?

Indeed. If we think we can sign better then go for it. Cork would easily get into most mid table premiership teams so no worries about him

I agree this is much more interesting than the average friendly. Would be a good opportunity to play the same teams consistently and would inky help the teams involved.

I could think of worse errors PO16_Saint

Does it even matter?

Doesn't he mean henderson?

I like the Samsungs due to their sd card support and removable batteries. I got my phone over a year ago now and just replaced the battery and it's like a new device. My mate's iPhone 5 that he got around the same time has very poor battery life now.

You've been an irritating little dweeb for years. What's your excuse?

Careful, he'll accuse you of the same thing in a minute!

I think we need to do everything we can to minimise the chance of wrongful conviction and as you rightly point out that is why the appeals process exists. You would hope that in this case that those who sit in judgement over the appeal will consider what has already been outlined and Ched's argument which is clearly at odds with the verdict. It's an imperfect world and it's very difficult to get many cases with one hundred percent certainty. I have a second cousin who was wrongfully convicted (thankfully not a major crime) and imo it's just as bad as the crime being committed in the first place. I just hope that in this case the decision after the appeal is the correct one.

I think ALL verdicts should be robustly questioned to make sure they stand up in the face of appeals. What I don't do is assume that because someone has been found guilty by a jury that automatically means their judgement is totally infallible. Ever heard of the West Memphis three? http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Memphis_Three Now again for those hard of thinking, I'm not saying that in this case the judgement is wrong, simply that a jury handing down a guilty verdict is not absolute proof of guilt.