hypochondriac

I think the point was that it was not proven at the time and there should always be a due process before deciding that someone is guilty. Don't think anyone has defended Saville since the amount of evidence came to light.

I'm guessing that's a joke based on the picture...

It was inevitable with that defence. Should have been addressed in the summer Tbh.

Jos has needed replacing for two years.

The silver cloud is the 20 quid I put on a spurs win once I saw the lineup. 60 quid not to be sniffed at!

Yep well summed up. Been saying it for ages but some people thought our squad would not cost us!

As I said, our squad depth is poor and mid table perhaps even lower mid table is where we will end up.

It's possible that the sticker was for an iPhone rather than an iPhone 5.

WHich local authorities?

Lol. No one has banned blackboards.

I hope I never meet these people. I don't think we would get along...

Whilst I disagree with this particular case, that comparison is just nuts.

People from Brighton love acting like drama queens.

This is a momentous day...

Thanks for that interesting article. Particularly this bit: Also it seems to be suggesting that the term wog as an offensive term for black people was coined after golliwog had been invented.

Except we have been dropping for about the last month. The loss to villa was extremely disheartening.

Yep agree with you here. Golliwogs are not racist and were still around in the 90s before they decided they were unacceptable.

We haven't had injuries like we have now.

Lower mid table it is then.

I've amassed a huge library of games but I don't have the machine to play them! I'm considering the steambox for next year but it's dependent on price.

The whole pregnancy thing was a dumb idea in the first place.

Yep pretty much agree with that and forming a good relationship with the players is a clear positive. What I objected to was the suggestion that Cortese was the single most important factor for luke Shaw. That's a nonsense.

Nope. The Daily Mail article was interesting and a good piece, as were all the positive match reports about our style of play and how well we were doing this year (something that Cortese deserves praise for). Surely you can see the difference between those and this article?

I have no problem with attention to detail. My main gripe was with how the article was written rather than the majority of the content. The Daily Mail article for instance was quite an interesting read last week but this PR stuff is insulting to any half intelligent person.

I certainly wouldn't swap him with Gold and Sullivan but they are pretty much the worst examples in the premier league. He has his flaws like all chairmen but has done a lot of good as well. That doesn't make the style and content of this article any less laughable.