hypochondriac

Apologies I meant Rayner

Fuck I messed up. I meant Rayner.

Who will the left be supporting? They won't be going for Streeting or Mahmood.

It all depends on if Labour can deliver. If they actually do something meaningful here and don't get stopped by the left of their party then they could do something. If they fail to show meaningful change before the next election then no one who wants immigration control is going to vote for labours version when the real thing is available to vote for.

I expect if the Labour Party members have their way she'd be high up the list.

Cheers. You do wonder how much leaving was his idea in the summer. Almost impossible to turn down 40 million but I do feel for the lad if hisncondition is holding him back and preventing him from performing, particularly because there isn't really any going back. Football can be quite brutal at times.

Big play from labour. This is pretty much their only chance to win the next election. If they can significantly bring down immigration and get rid of some of the ones here then they have a small chance. If the likes of Reeves succeeds in replacing Starmer then it's all cancelled and they will implode.

It's because I said I knew someone who confirmed what he had. I didn't say it was a negative thing.

I got absolutely roasted on here when I said that in the summer. It's a invasion of privacy apparently to even mention it.

Indeed. We couldn't afford him even if we wanted him back and he wanted to come here.

Get Steve Grant to trace the IP to Phil Parson's office.

I've sussed it Johannes (and) Rasmus Openly Bullshitts Big shorts. Hiding in plain sight.

Well pointed out. We've found one lads.

I agree. Labour have capitulated to their back benchers.

There are no rumours.

Nice to have an area of agreement with you for a change.

Don't say Chinaman. It's a slur apparently...

And you can see why!

You're also correct that local authorities are legally required to spend the vast majority of their budget on things they have no choice over. That means they are reduced to presiding over the tiny percentage left over to make any choices with. A much better situation would be to have more rigorous and impartial assessments of SEND, fully fund those who actually require it across the country directly from central government, remove it from those who have lesser needs abd allow local authorities a proper budget where they can make actual choices for their communities. It's mad that an area of high disadvantage with large amounts of SEND have a far lower budget for other things than a more affluent area.

I know that happens. It is also the case that funding relies to.alarge degree on the people writing the applications and how bloody minded the parent is. Parents who don't give much of a toss about their children or who are incapable of making a fuss or who are worn down by the system get overlooked or ignored. A parent willing to make enough fuss will receive support if they know the right things to say and do even if their child doesn't actually require the support over someone who does.

Do we know exactly what was said at that meeting?

Doubt they will be dumping him given they've paid money to use him for the season.

Very much doubt that's going to happen.

Who is fab and where has he said this?

If i was in charge I'd loan out one of our keepers and get the Sunderland keeper in on loan. I'd get a tall striker possibly on loan and maybe jwp if he wants to come. I'd offload Aribo and Edozie and maybe Downes, bring back Bree and it looks like Jelert is going back for some odd reason. With everyone fit my team would be: Patterson Bree/Mads Wood/Stephens THB Wellington Romeu/jwp Charles/Jander Fellows/Armstrong Scienza/Robinson Azaz New striker/Stewart