hypochondriac

I wouldn't say that's too outlandish. Archer and Adams are probably comparable. Certainly Ramsdale, Dibling and Fernandes are a cut above everyone else in that list. I expect they will all leave though.

Reckon we could get 7 million for ABK? Would represent decent business at this point.

Still.

Looks like a decent signing. Small though so not really one that fits our profile.

I'm happy with my initial reaction.

Genuinely this is amazing business. To get that much for a player who has completely flopped is brilliant. It will be worth even more if the early money brought in allows us to keep one of our three jewels (Ramsdale, Fernandes or Dibling).

More bad news for Starmer as Sultana brain and Corbyn look to setup the long predicted Islam Party.

Villa?

I still think he wi go but if we keep Fernandes that may then be good enough.

We had Cody Cropper but he never played for the first team.

For me, that's the nicest shirt we've had since the sash.

If you really want it, much better getting the cheap knockoff for small amounts.

Quite like that to be honest. It's only a kit either way but normally I think they look shit.

You'd be forgiven for wondering if some of the players had difficulty last season.

The only risk attached is the importance of him hitting the ground running and not taking toopng to find his feet. With Stewart being uncertain and Archer and Armstrong not necessarily staying, we really need him to perform if we want to go back up.

Martin trying to pass his way out from the back against the likes of Madrid and PSG is going to be fucking funny.

Of course it's not a bad thing. I was only challenging the notion that it was big money for this league. It's really not.

So more than double what we've paid here then.

Quite a short statement on our OS. Can we read anything into that?

You'd only need one incident with a bodycam of a minority being tasered though and there would be riots.

Particularly given how much we spent on Shea Charles last time.

You see whelk, part of the trouble these days is hyperbole and need to dramatise for all those with v short attention spans.

And yet Starmer trumpets a big welfare reform and can't even get it passed in any meaningful form. Hardly a projection of strength or demonstration of his majority.

Fair amount of anecdotal evidence from past MPs that this goes on. I used to know a civil servant (I had to be interviewed as part of his security clearance to get the job.) He said it wasn't really a thing in his department but there were a couple of activists types in more recent times as things got more heated.

Add in the civil servants who seem to just ignore their duty to carry our policy if it's something they don't like, the OBR who seem to dictate what can and can't be done more than the actual government and backbenchers who can just derail government agenda and you're not too wrong. A lame duck government totally incapable of doing anything meaningfully transformative and essentially rearranging the deckchairs on the titanic.