Jump to content

NickG

Members
  • Posts

    14,535
  • Joined

Everything posted by NickG

  1. Once again, this post shows the ability of people with little knowledge of fact to enjoy criticising. Where has it been said this was never discussed? All the information suggests that this issue has come from FL adding a condition of registration at the last minute - hardly Pinnacles fault. Fry has said this is not an issue about Pinnacle, it appears to be about how he has sold the club and the FL's take on that. Fry said any purchaser would be in the same boat. The fact that you have made up criticisms and ignored fact for the opportunity to slag off pinnacle is not impressive.
  2. this is what I have tried to say but you have put much better! I am quite relaxed about this as feel the FL have been shown that the club was never in admin!
  3. or the removal of current penalty
  4. no, chill out and look forward to next week
  5. that the terms of the deal he sought are not reaching leagues requirements due to them bending the rules to punish us. This will apply for other bidders.
  6. um - is this fair tho; the league state that parent company going bust does not mean club will get penalty our structure pre-dates the rules no other club has had a penalty when holding company only went bust there has been no deceit we may benefit,but has anyone else had the same set of circs and been punished?
  7. That's how I read it - problem is more administrator v league than Pinnacle,hence I am not stressed.
  8. where have we tried to deceive anyone?
  9. this meeting could be good news, we may not need the right to appeal
  10. it will all be ok mate.
  11. I am relaxed about this and looking forward to MLT and the new season
  12. people need to remember we are different from other clubs who have lost points. SLH was set up before these rules SLH have had other companies SLH went bust not the club. The rules state if its a holding company, as long as club continues to trade there will be no penalty. other holding companies have gone bust with clubs not receiving penalty - as their holding company had other active busineses as well It would not open flood gates if they changed the penalty
  13. again, nothing says it has only just been discovered has it? Not seen that said at all.
  14. disagree. We would be big news to go out of existence - no exaggeration to say sort of issue that mp would raised in H of C. If it was purely on finances etc fine - but because they don't want an outsider looking at their rules??!! They would have big problems
  15. no it wouldn't. By their written rules we definately and clearly avoid a penalty. What is wrong is that they imposed it anyway
  16. How fair will the FL look if they let a club go out of business just because they were not willing to let a fair impartial trbunal look at their decision on points? They would look awful and IMHO wouldn't let it happen
  17. hey 3 threads on this! How fair will the FL look if they let a club go out of business just because they were not willing to let a fair impartial trbunal look at their decision on points? They would look awful and IMHO wouldn't let it happen
  18. How fair will the FL look if they let a club go out of business just because they were not willing to let a fair impartial trbunal look at their decision on points? They would look awful and IMHO wouldn't let it happen
  19. How fair will the FL look if they let a club go out of business just because they were not willing to let a fair impartial trbunal look at their decision on points? They would look awful and IMHO wouldn't let it happen
  20. emerged late - or being trying to get it sorted for a while? again criticising without facts. not seen anything saying this has suddenly come up just that its still not sorted
  21. we know nothing! its not a question of whether they fancy it or think its right. its a cold business decision based on the letter of the law, the structure of us and legal advice. let them get on with it, if there is a fair chance - fight it
  22. what's best for the long term of the club. if it takes another week and the league back down, or give us chance to appeal its worth it
  23. would it have been more straight forward with your mate's bid?
  24. thanks for the update, shame- and appreciate the reasons- it can't say much. Good to think if us tho
  25. well I thought it was interesting!
×
×
  • Create New...