NickG

Surman / Molyneux LB Skacel / Dyer sold using money to retain others and get steady RB and target man?

season tickets won't be moving, ffs calm down its badly worded thats all

sorry misread it -no he can't play if still on loan you are right

no full away allocation

think I remember there being a fuss when a team had a non-appearance against them clause in perm transfer and you can't do it

the bit on there, and radio about him wanting medical etc -is that now or in the summer?

says arrivals first -must be more significant than the departures!

this has got to be the most moronic post I have ever seen on here. I have no problem with the gallows humour etc, but to genuinely think death threats and two attacks on his family home is hilarious -you must be some kind of immature idiot.

didn't mean Lowe as can't see him talking him around. The only three ways he will get rid of Lowe are; 1) manage to buy up enough shares - looking unlikely as I understand from posters on here not enough are available to him 2) convince enough shareholders to back him -suggest Lowe isn't worth trying! 3) find the £6m investment into the club that Lowe/Wilde have said will make them walk away. Can't see how his comments help any of these, can you? -and that was my point, I continue to be embarrassed by the off field publicity we get. I don't know enough about the truth about wages etc to say who would be better at running the PLC, but if its was a straight gut feeling choice for a single person -Crouch. I am still concerned (and heard all the arguments and possible explanations) as to why Wilde went so against him to turn 100% -but that is just a concern as I don't know.

yes you are right. I made that all up. You have found all my posts supporting him. Sorry.

it is, and they should have taken it, and ideally matched it

I know you like negativity but far too many in one sentence for it to make sense!

its not ousting them tho is it? if he does that he will have huge support, this is just slagging them off

just because I don't lust after Crouch doesn't mean I like Lowe. Very easy way to try and defend any point against him "just Lowe luvvie". As you are so keen to rate and label posters why don't you randomly look at any of my posts over the last few months and see how many praise lowe and how many criticise him. You are just wrong. For what its worth, if you do so want to assess me 1) I am a lifelong fan, from chocolate boxes to St Marys 2) I never used to know or care who was in the chair. 3) I got totally fed up with Lowe and his ridiculous ego 4) He was at fault for our relegation, but IMHO not solely (just as he was not solely responsible for better league finishes cup final etc,) 5) I welcomed Wilde's campaign to oust him 6) I bought a modest shareholding to assist and feel part of it 7) I met, emailed and spoke with Lee Hoos during the campaign. The rest is history. 9) I am saddened and feel helpless at the state of out club 10) I still look forward to going, but come away disapointed each game 11) I am beyond trusting or understanding the counter arguements about administration Crouch v Lowe. 12) I want a united board/club 13) that will never be achived with Lowe. 14) We made a mistake before of replacing Lowe without a proper alternative and I still think Crouch should talk to shareholders rather than continually airing this in public for no gain. Guess I am Lowe luvvie then.

sorry didn't realise you were keeping credibility ratings! bit sad, how did I lose out? I agree Lowe probably does have the biggest ego of the three of them, but as said on the others doesn't mean all have to lower to the lowest common denominator.

thanks

anyone???:confused:

it was a sensible and mature point, if you can't answer fair enough but doesn't make the point childish. I am on about the shareholders continual public embaressing squabbles. Pointless and negative. of course BBC are interested, it is interesting -just like reality TV -doesn't make it beneficial which is what he should be aiming for. Genuine offers of money are a positive thing, although I am not convinced he offered it expecting a chance of acceptance. I don't know why Lowe (probably due to his ego and childish games) said no but £6m and we walk away.

it can hurt the club in that just about every departing player, manager, ex player and pundit states that the boardroom instability has a bad effect on the team. I appreciate your view on the opposition bit but personally don't see that as fitting. He is not in a formal role to undermine the board with fans etc is he? Sure campaign with shareholders and investors but this public criticism continually knocks the club - Lowe is as bad

I want Lowe out. Yes I think it would be good to have some money! how about asking the question about what good this does the club as opposed to his ego?

not that he will care but I will reserve judgement on him until his actions catch up with his words!

don't mean this as silly question, but what is the protest demanding? Lowe step down for Crouch?

that was the one I read earlier (thanks CEC from the other thread)

don't think we can, on their site they were saying want to sign him this window permanently rather to lose him to someone else in summer but at least they have him definately for this season

don't mean this as silly question, but what is the protest demanding? Lowe step down for Crouch?