That's... odd. I mean, I know The Express is basically a red top, but even so...
Also, it's possibly copyright infringement, unless they had permission to use content from this site.
It's their fans and the pundits that have treated this like a done deal, like we don't have any right to keep hold of him, that's ****ed me off most during this.
Looks like he'll be a very welcome addition to the team, looking forward to seeing just what he can do in a Saints shirt.
Good to see that our stance on VvD isn't stopping us from being able to buy these sorts of players just yet too.
That's more or less the point I'm making. We could hold him to his contract.
We're not the ones in the wrong here, and if VvD decided to kick up a stink even more, I don't think he'd have many people siding with him.
Thing is, if we hold firm and keep him, is he really prepared to sit on his arse for 5 years? If we were picking him for the team, he'd be in breach of contract and liable for fines if he doesn't play.
https://uk.sports.yahoo.com/news/liverpool-move-van-dijk-blocked-furious-southampton-133115456.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw
Is the article, nothing new in there as far as I can see.