Jump to content

Jimmy_D

Moderators
  • Posts

    6777
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jimmy_D

  1. AS Roma seem to have copied our parody announcement video (as in, literally used some of our material) to announce their own signing. Frankly it's pretty weird.
  2. I.. Um... OK...
  3. Liverpool fans are funny. It's like the ****wits think the only possible thing we can offer a player is the opportunity to move to a 'bigger' club. That we'll have to sell van Dijk or no one will ever sign for us again.
  4. http://www.empireofthekop.com/2017/07/18/klopp-laments-crazy-england-laughs-that-nobodies-cost-25m/ Aww, seems like it's starting to be that poor old Liverpool can't just outspend other clubs to get better than them any more. Of course, rather than seeing it as leading to healthy competition in the Premier League, they see it as the Premier League shooting itself in the foot. I mean, just imagine how terrible it would be if Liverpool started to slip even further down the league...
  5. There's absolutely no chance at all we'll be paying him extra to honour his current contract.
  6. If VvD was on strike we wouldn't be seeing him in training videos That much at least is utter ********.
  7. 'Perhaps he's ok under a different manager' is what stung us with Osvaldo. We already have VvD who we know is ok off the pitch. And about twice as good on it. I'd rather take the risk of VvD playing ok like Wanyama and Schneiderlin did while we use our scouts to find a better replacement than Sakho.
  8. Considering it's his off field attitude that's stopping Liverpool from using him, I'd say it has some bearing.
  9. Part of what we look at when signing a player is his character, and the odd times we've taken a risk and gone against that (Osvaldo in particular) it's not worked out too well. From the little I've heard he has a pretty horrendous attitude off the pitch.
  10. The club still see it as a point of principle. In effect, VvD is unsettled purely because of an illegal tapping up by Liverpool. If he were to put in a transfer request, it does nothing to change that, and accepting it would just in effect allow the tapping up to have the desired effect for Liverpool, so he'd just be throwing away his loyalty bonus for nothing. A strike might do it, but it'd still be unlikely to get him to Liverpool, I don't think he's that sort of character, and it's not like he suddenly hates Saints all of a sudden to do that.
  11. There's absolutely nothing stopping VvD finding work elsewhere if he doesn't want to play for us. We don't need to give up the registratation that would let him play for someone else though. Being a footballer isn't the only job on the planet, funnily enough.
  12. Sounds like he's finally starting to accept VvD won't be moving to me.
  13. That's something that will be verifiable and it's been noted that you've claimed that.
  14. Oh jeez. Have to admit seeing the title of the Ugly Inside blog post pop up just now on Twitter... They got me. 'Tis not too often I'm fooled by something like that, but they got me. Utter bellends
  15. Dunno, doesn't sound like something Liverpool would do...
  16. Wouldn't put it past the media team to have been trolling the fans, ours AND Liverpool's, with that first video that didn't have him in.
  17. Also it's an article from the Mirror with no quotes No one joins Liverpool with an expectation of regular Champions League football these days.
  18. Yeah he did about three hours ago...
  19. 'Rich' is a relative term in football these days. As I've said before, even the top end £70M probably wouldn't leave us with one of the world's top CBs on a five year contract, even if we were prepared to spend the whole lot to try and do that. It's a different situation to most of the other times when we've already had replacements lined up with at least the potential to be as good or better than what we're letting go.
  20. 'Rich' is a relative term in football these days. As I've said before, even the top end £70M probably wouldn't leave us with one of the world's top CBs on a five year contract, even if we were prepared to spend the whole lot to try and do that. It's a different situation to most of the other times when we've already had replacements lined up with at least the potential to be as good or better than what we're letting go.
  21. He's earned that with his form on loan. Be interesting to see if he can carry that through into form for us now.
  22. Great news! Last season was awesome for him, and his breakthrough was one of the real highlights. We might have a real gem of a player here.
  23. Obviously a done deal.
×
×
  • Create New...