stevegrant

Townsend, Janmaat, Redmond, Ayew. And only for relative peanuts. We know Townsend has an £8m release clause.

No. To make it absolutely crystal clear, that grid is wrong. The highest non-CL league position is ranked higher than the second domestic cup winner, so it would be the League Cup winner who miss out in that not-ever-going-to-happen-in-a-month-of-Sundays scenario.

They get a bye straight to the semi-final.

Why? That's not the scenario we're in, nor is it a scenario that's remotely likely. But to hopefully shut you up so we can discuss the actual reality: Q1: 1, 2, 6, 7 (group stage), 3 (qualifier) Q2: 4, 8 (group stage), 5 (qualifier) Q3: 9

The point you're making is the ultimate straw man argument, it's a non-point. Firstly, as I said, that line is factually incorrect. The hierarchy of Europa League slots is that the highest non-Champions League-qualifying league position is first (group stage qualification), followed by the primary domestic cup winners, i.e. the FA Cup (also group stage qualification). In other countries, the third Europa League place always goes to the next highest league position, but England and France are exceptions as they have two domestic cups - for the winners of these, they get the third-ranked Europa League position, which is only to the third qualifying round. If the winner of one of the cups has already qualified for Europe via other means, that qualification spot goes to the next non-qualified team in the league - as it has always been for the League Cup place and as it has been for the last two years for the FA Cup (hence how we got in a year ago). Secondly, again, that line in that (incorrect) table is irrelevant. "If teams outside top 4 wins UCL and UEL". Liverpool can win the Europa League, which gets a Champions League place. We do not have a team in the Champions League final.

It literally doesn't matter. Your precious row 4 scenario is only for when BOTH European cups are won by English clubs.

It's wrong. The first non-Champions League place in the PL is a higher-ranking position than the winner of the second domestic cup competition (i.e. the League Cup), hence it getting an automatic group stage place whereas winning the League Cup only gets you into the qualifying rounds. As an aside, it also requires English clubs to win both European cup competitions while simultaneously not qualifying for those competitions through normal means - pretty unlikely at the best of times, and as we only have one English team in a final, I think it's safe to assume it's not a scenario that anyone needs to worry about any time soon.

A scenario that doesn't exist.

Correct. Unless you subscribe to the theory that if they're not in Europe at all next season (which would be the case if they lose on Wednesday), they'd be pretty well placed to have a proper tilt at winning the title if they make a few key signings, whereas if they're juggling Champions League commitments as well, that could get in the way.

It's in the middle of their domestic season in Brazil, so sadly it's #NoGulyNoParty

Don't think you need the "alleged" bit there when he's demonstrated it before everyone's eyes on numerous occasions. Like I said, good player for a team at our level, but I don't think he's anywhere near good enough for a likely title challenger, unless they're all going to start copying the Leicester model of being really **** at passing but winning the ball back and counter-attacking at pace. Which they're not.

Congratulations to pretty much everyone on this thread for missing the flashing neon signs saying SARCASM next to the OP.

Well Arsenal might want a player who (generally) struggles with pass completion to play in their team that has LOTS of possession, solely for the bits of the game he's really good at (tackling, intercepting, giving away silly fouls, getting sent off, etc), but I personally find it quite unlikely. He's a very good player (mostly) for a team at our level, particularly against the better teams when we don't have as much possession, but I genuinely don't see him flourishing at the highest level.

People have said that about every player who's left us. We still get by... Clasie was never brought in to replace Wanyama, he was brought in as the ball-playing part of the central midfield, which Schneiderlin offered. Clearly he's not as good as MS, his defensive work isn't in any way comparable, but he and Romeu combined offer decent coverage of the skills we lost last summer. Still not entirely sure which "big" club Wanyama thinks will actually sign him.

Either/or, really. Anything that isn't a Liverpool win keeps them below us going into Sunday. With the West Ham/Man United game, I think realistically we have to pick sides rather than hope for a dull draw. If it is a draw, it keeps West Ham below us but only on goal difference by one goal, so technically our destiny wouldn't be entirely in our own hands, as if they were to win at Stoke by more than we beat Palace (hypothetically), they'd finish above us. Man United have Bournemouth at home on Sunday, and they've been phoning it in for a few weeks now, so realistically we've got no chance of catching them - as a result, we might as well get behind them and focus on sixth place.

Each club's coefficient score is based on the points they have earned in the previous five years plus 20% of the nation coefficient score. As we hadn't played in Europe in the previous 5 years, our score was entirely comprised of that 20%, which gave us a score of 16.078 (from a total of 80.39). HOWEVER, the first of the five years that were counted for this season's score (2010/11) was a particularly good year for English clubs in Europe, and that score will drop off of the scale this summer. If Liverpool were to lose to Sevilla in the Europa League final, the total English coefficient for 2015/16 (basically all the coefficient points earned by the 8 competing clubs divided by the number of clubs) will be 14.25, or 14.5 if they win it. That compares to the 18.357 we earned in 2010/11, which will no longer count. Quite a steep drop, hence why there was a concern about losing a Champions League place to Italy - as it turns out, English clubs outperformed Italian clubs this year, but Italy gains another 4 points on us NEXT summer, so it's pretty important our clubs do better across the board next season. If Liverpool lose the EL final, the overall score for English clubs will be 76.284, or 76.309 if they win. 20% of that is either 15.257 or 15.262. We earned a whopping 2.5 points in this season's competition, so our score will be either 17.757 or 17.762 if we qualify - a reasonable increase because we get to use 100% of our own points, and 20% of the nation's score.

Nope. If we finish 6th, we'd DEFINITELY want Man United to win the FA Cup as then the 6th place in the league would be an automatic group stage spot.

No Europa League places available for that anymore, the prize is purely financial. Edit: seems we're joint top. With everyone. http://www.premierleague.com/en-gb/matchday/fair-play.html

Well the first of those is already out. I think, also, that there is a bit of small print in the UEFA qualifying criteria that states that if the winner of the Europa League also finishes in a position that would get them back in that competition, we actually lose a EL slot, which seems **** to me, but that's what the rule implies. Far too many permutations to list, but realistically the only team above us we're actually supporting in any real capacity is Man United in the FA Cup final. Liverpool winning the Europa League is meaningless - we just need them to falter in the league so we can finish above them (or West Ham/Man United, possibly, but that's even more unlikely).

Quite surprised that they appear to have just accepted it and paid up, considering that QPR are still fighting their fine.

The rules have changed since then. A country can have a maximum of 5 teams in the Champions League now, but only 4 can qualify via the league. If the current rules were in place back then, Spurs would have still qualified for the playoff round, with Chelsea going into the group stage as a top seed.

You have far too much time and money on your hands, Trev

Personally reckon Benteke would be an amazing signing for us, would fit our system nicely, and could be one final merking of the Liverpool finance department if we were able to get him on favourable terms (i.e. nowhere near the £32.5m they paid for him less than a year ago)

Not much we can do when the player doesn't want to sign his name on our contract.

****ing hell, you're tedious. Don't want to go? Don't go. I doubt anyone will give two ****s. Claus paid for the pitch hire and staffing - nothing out of the ordinary there, I'm sure the group in charge of organising Kelvin's testimonial are doing likewise.