notnowcato

No analysis is required here. I appreciate subjectivity is your idea of hell but it's all around us or so I believe. It's clearly a tactic, we are not alone in applying it. Klippety and others have been doing it for ages.

What do you mean exactly by impact injuries? Can we objectively define if the impact is sufficient for the need of medical attention? How certain are we that the player is not already managing an injury that the impact was on and if so, what is the scale of that injury and what value of impact is required for it to then require medical attention? With that in mind, if the answer is 10 how the f**k does that help you, exactly?

Record attendance and total catchment area are independent of each other.

As a fan I’d recommend staying in the present. We can’t change the past and can’t control the future. Enjoy the football whilst we are performing well, everything else is just noise.

I think you’re mixing your Harrys. Most premier league strikers make Maguire look like a cart horse.

According to the BBC…

I feel he still needs space to fully understand his game at the top level. He needs to go through a dip in form and know what it takes to come through that. He needs more composure at those critical moments that a striker faces. All of those things and no doubt more, I think, are best learnt away from the hyper critical spotlight you have at English champions league clubs. I believe if Armando is given that space over the next 18 months Chelsea will reap the reward. All of that could of course be bollocks and possibly wishful thinking on my part. Time will tell.

Broja won’t be ready for Chelsea next season. Massive waste to see him sat on their bench. I think he’s loaned out again next season, hopefully it will be us.

Gotcha and agreed. It’s not as negative as suggested by the half wit commentators.

Skewed is one way of describing it, I'd probably lean more towards "the reason why" we have lost so many points from winning positions is because we score first in a high percentage of our games.

Well said Prof. Most post match “interviews” are a f**king waste of time, it’s purely about the ad space. Ralph’s honest point of view is as valid as anyones and I welcome it, I’d also welcome more honest opinions from the managers.

I agree with you on Moi and Redmond. I'm not convinced yet that Tella will kick on to become a Premier league player.

It's occurred more than once this season where I've baulked at seeing Moi selected to start but he's gone on to have a really strong game - not every game though. He was excellent last night.

By a long chalk the best half of football I've seen us play since Koeman.

Agreed but in a way I'm glad he didn't. No doubt he'll have options at the end of the season; we're a strong contender to have him for at least another season. Come on Armando, you know it makes sense.

Possibly or you give him 60 minutes to give Shaw nightmares

I think Redmond had a knock. Either way after a performance like last night most managers would be reluctant to make changes.

Can’t see any changes to the starting line up unless there are some injuries.

The scoreline in their last match v Brighton massively flattered Spurs. Brighton's defence was dog dirt for some reason and the second was about as lucky a goal you'll see. You can see Conte is slowly getting his team into shape from an attacking point of view but they still look susceptible to leaking goals. COYS

A "thunderbastard" of a match report again, cheers

Question for Ralph is does he match Conte’s 3-4-3 formation with Stephens - Bednarek - Salisu as the back 3? I wouldn’t be opposed to that. Typically, Son looks like he’s finding some form again. JWP and Romeu should easily have the better of Winks and Hojbjerg.

All fluff and bluster as per usual. Unable to answer any points raised at a dignified level. Some jobs going at no.10 as of the last couple of days, suspect you’re over qualified though.

Maybe the impact is as simple as available, part of the squad, wearing the red and white - all positive as far as his team mates are concerned. To suggest he's not fussed about Saints is lacking a tad of depth and human intelligence whilst also disregarding the pissibolity that Chelsea won't buy back (Tino) or sell (Broja)

For what it’s worth your point does stand. As does the original post. You are both right, woohoo, what a world eh?!

I believe the original poster is reflecting on the impact to the team not the bank balance.