saintwarwick

Guess you missed the other posters who were in attendance then :shock:

A very good assessment, nobody knows but can only gestimate.

Probably something to do with innocent until proven guilty....

I didn't see the highlights but did see the game on Sunday, according to my eyes we had more chances than Reading (and the stats).

Watching 90+ minutes is far better than edited highlights, it gives a better perspective.

He's out of his armchair at the moment.

Yes but without fatality, when this occurs then we should face the consequences.

I don't know but I know he deserves a long stint in jail if he is guilty.

The Reading fans did make a bit of noise a couple of times but I thought overall they were quite poor, they came alive when they scored which is quite expected but we outsung them for most of the game. The several slow renditions of OWTS was good.

My sentiments, unfortunatley he won't.

I've gone past helping, your excuse

Lowe does seem to have influences/friends with the Mail. Every now and again the Mail will print a pro Lowe story.

We got him on loan for three months in September with Nathan Dyer going in the opposite direction, I don't know what date it was but surely if Robertson has gone back then Dyer will be back with us, if that's the case where was Dyer on Sunday? As you say perhaps the OS can give us the true state of affairs but lets not hold our breathe.

Yep, just like all the pro/anti Lowe banter on this forum.

Pedantic maybe but this highlights the issue being discussed, still someone with a limited mindscale cannot grasp the facts, I used the word from a previous poster to highlight that post, it was no way used by myself in the derogatory version as you quote but your limited intellect cannot grasp that as featured by your response to post 42. If ****ing around with words is too complex for you then please read in this order, post 22 followed by 34 then 36, someone with a sound piece of mind will be able to grasp where the term originated and my post was merely to highlight the "response" by the originator

I repeat again, read the whole thread and come back and tell me who posted the 'muppet' quote, if that is possible for you to do that you will find I used the term to highlight the original poster's quote on the subject and not my view, but it seems you cannot comprehend this issue.

Are you for real or can you not read? I have not denied using the word muppet but pointed out to you where it came from in the first place. It started out in post 22 (someone not in your bracket of fanbase), then Fan the flames responded (someone you can identify with) and I responded accordingly but you still find it difficult to go back to the original post. If it is possible please go back to the start of this thread and read right through then come back and identify who called who a muppet. As for your original point Planet earth has many things to think about rather than someone called Lowe just like this forum, if you think that this forum is all ond only about Lowe then you are on the wrong forum.

Of course, please read Tamesaint's post and my reply and you will see that the second line was never mentioned or in question, please keep up and have a nice day

You should of done your homework, post 22 (swannymere) was the reference on the anti Lowe muppets, Fan the Flames responded (post 34) and I merely responded to Fan the flames post (36). Guess you got it wrong:D

The chorus is good but the verse is an opinion without foundation.

I replied to your original post as highlighted above, you mentioned the first line not me so the strange world you live in must be your blinkered view. As for the phrase "muppet" please enlighten me as to when I used this term.

And the first line of that post did not contain the word Lowe, if you cannot see that then I suggest you go to specsavers tomorrow, assuming they have not gone into administration and are facing closure As for the "pro Lowe muppet" I will treat it with the contempt it deserves.

It appears you are speculating as it mentions absolutely nothing on the OS as cover for Killer.

I'm sure he is well down in the pecking order at Chelsea, however your cryptic clue with 'Jan' in the quote could go some way to where he will be for the rest of the season, hopefully.

It's good to see a loan player willing to speak to his boss about extending the loan don't you think? He (Cork) knows full well his first team chances at Chelsea are virtually nil so why not gain more valuable experience in a championship side willing to give him first team football. Apart from that thanks for your valuable input in this thread