saintwarwick

Pure speculation, maybe his parent club had a say in the loan agreement, just a thought which you will probably overlook and blame Lowe, Wilde, saints uber fans, happy clappys and anyone else who doesn't agree with you or your posts. I'm quite happy he is staying until the end of January and hopefully we can keep him for the remainder of the season but like you I know nothing about the terms of the loan.

The thread was about 'the fans yesterday' hence the response about the anti-Lowe muppets hijacking this thread.

I've previously been called happy clappy and now punchdrunk, priceless.

We have other forms of revenue like sponsorship deals, board advertising, championship prize money, TV revenue from live games and highlight packages and other merchandising products, plus you will never get a mass boycott as there will be a large element who support Lowe or go to support the team and don't want to get entangled with the politics of the club. So a mass boycott would not be as mass as you think and Lowe and his cronies would not been gone in days. The last sentence is in my opinion only.

Really, and you'd do well to change the record. Accusation my arse, I haven't accused anyone of anything, I merely pointed out quite a few of us saw a different game to the poster I replied to. Still it's typical of you to change the course of the post to suit your negative agenda and all from the comfort of your armchair without any knowledge of the game at all. All your negative replies to posters who don't fit into your criteria all have a touch of irony with the added pot, kettle, black.

I support the team unlike you so that makes me normal and you abnormal. P.S. I don't like Lowe like the rest of them but I don't see anyone else doing anything for our club BUT I WILL ASK YOU AGAIN WHAT IS THE ALTERNATIVE AS YOU HAVE FAILED TO ANSWER THIS QUESTION ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS.

Good to see you ignored my reply (140) to your original post, obviously quite a few of us saw a different game to you.

So when we were/was in a relegation dogfight scrap last season was/were you boycotting games? I await your reply. P.S. I am a normal saints fan unlike people like yourself who won't help the cause but continue to slaughter the club rather than get behind the team. Your obsession with Lowe shows you have no passion for the club but with one person who does not fit in with your criteria of how our club should be run. You have yet to come up with a viable alternative to solve our problems yet continue to slate fans who continue to get behind the team.

Some get too worked up over alps version of games he has not seen, is that not difficult to comprehend?

Sky control viewing football worldwide, Setanta have the leftovers which means not a lot will see the game.

You seemed to have missed a few points from the game. You mentioned Reading hitting the woodwork but failed to mention Mcgoaldrick's bullet of a shot that hit the underside of the bar. We also tested their goalie a couple of times forcing saves and Reading failed to have one shot at goal in the first half. You also say Reading were not interested, I say we were the better team and Reading could not work out how to play us just like the last time we played them. You also missed the blatant handball from Reading in the penalty area at the end of the game. After we scored Reading upped their game which is to be expected by a team that is in all probability a promoted side. Possession wise it was 51% - 49% in favour of us, goal attempts: Saints 15 (9 on target), Reading 8 (5 on target). That makes your post a bit more balanced

The repeat back riposte is in response to the same old ******** from you after each game, you see it works both ways As for the triangles I don't know what game you were watching (or not as is the case :shock:) but it was mostly hoof upfield and I witnessed Mcgoaldrick having a good game

And I didn't count them Kingsland was a lot fuller than normal as was the Chapel.

And a good game as well.

I counted three times and came up with the same figure, 20k.

My thoughts when I read your post.

Just got back and yes I cannot believe how that penalty was missed, seems like the whole ground less the Reading fans also saw it but somehow the ref didn't.

I'm sure there are plenty of under sixteens waiting in the wings

Surman was signing autographs at half time from the players box, I wonder if anyone asked him if he's off.

As opposed to her jubblies out of her t-shirt....

Burley has left but we are still awaiting your return to SMS....

I won't be bunging any money on a boycott as my season ticket cost enough money so I will be attending the game and cheering the team/kids on and not bother with this anti-Lowe malarky. I don't remember fans asking for a mass boycott last season when we was in a relegation dogfight.

The only way Lowe lost his power last time was through someone (Wilde) buying more shares than him and finding more allies to boost their share holdings which was greater than Lowe's, even then Lowe waited to the very end before stepping down although he knew deep down he was onto a loser. Lowe is thick skinned and any boycott would be ammunition in his pocket to blame the fans for not attending SMS.

Also you have to take into consideration that 9,500 of those fans have already purchased their tickets so most will choose not to boycott. You also have a lot of pro Lowe who do not bother to post on this forum and as you say the members on this forum are a minority. In the poll running "would you boycott" only 268 have registered a vote which is about 1% of the gate against Forest recently.

The game is on Setanta not Sky so there will be no worldwide audience to see us defeat United