egg

I think it's a given that they've anticipated a lengthy ban and have looked at alternatives. That's an entirely different issue to people seriously talking about Howe or Frank though.

Isn't he's one of the others with a new name?

Yep. Massive potential. I like Hall and Scott, they've added something different. Bellingham is just on another level, Gordon is brilliant, Saka is back to his best, and Rogers I really like. There's also great players who weren't involved. The return fixture against Spain is the one that matters.

It isn't. It's a different point. You seem like another poster (or login) who answers a question with an unrelated answer, or a question. Farmers question remains unanswered.

That's a different point. He asked "which left-wingers have wanted continued Muslim immigration to the UK?" I'd like to know the answer to.

Is there really a discussion about Howe or Frank joining us?! People need to acknowledge who and where we are.

People are worried, don't confuse that with "genuine anxiety". Regardless, the simple point remains. If you believe a claim about information to be bullshit, treat it accordingly and move on. I don't know whether MB has or hasn't heard anything, but he's merely said that we should hear something. Hardly ground breaking, or anything to get upset or anxious about. Re that last part. Most people have the common sense to appreciate that a source cannot be identified, or even hinted at, for reasons that should be obvious. If a forum user feels that they have a right to drill down to "assess the credibility of a source" that's a bit daft given it's bloody obvious that they won't get that information.

And that is the bottom line. The constant posts from people getting wound up about it are tragic and funny in equal measure.

Surely the action of killing a politician, and then plotting to kill another from the same party (understandably the facts and evidence around that haven't been disclosed), is a sign of political motivation.

I think it's Turkish crying for help to sort out his musical taste.

Law of averages mate. It'd be a bit odd if amongst the thousands of forum users there weren't some people who have some relevant information, or relevant knowledge of the process we're in.

On a forum this size, there will be and is, some people who know what's what.

Incorrect. Appeals focus on whether the original panel/court/tribunal got it wrong, not new evidence.

More than 30 seems perfectly sensible.

Yep. No idea who many of them are though, especially the one who looks about 12.

Yep, although the issue is more the see saw of 10 years going up and stock down. Those 10 years are frighteningly high. There'll come a point where the bonds are the safer investment...I suspect this morning was the start of investor shift. Re HL, I've transferred my SIPP to HL, and am moving ISA over. The fees are so much lower, and the positive of the app being a bit shit is I don't spend time looking at it!!

Sweepstake on him becoming Iranian?

Wise. The only consolation is I think there'll be a big dip to buy in.

Hopefully they ignore the reality they face if voting for Nigel or Lowe. As much as I broadly agree with you as to where our economy is at, an austerity system under reform (or Lowe's lot) is not the answer. Alas, the Tories (not helped by COVID, granted) made a bad situation a lot worse, and left no platform for any government to easily build on.

I'd read that it had degraded, hence it didn't work as it should. That said, I struggle with the idea of banging someone up for 30 years then killing them.

The FTSE has fallen on it's arse this morning, and the 10 years are at 5.5% Dangerous territory.

Our 10 years are above theirs, and growing scarily quickly. Latest figures below. The FTSE was up this am and the 10 years down, and those positions reversed during the day. The markets will inevitably fall when yields are this attractive. I'm starting to move things around a wee bit.

It's unbelievable, and seems to be much more sinister than "just" the fight initially reported.

Gotcha, thanks that. Breaching an NDA isn't clever, but it's hard to see how that undermines the decision itself. Let's see where this goes.

Whatever the word used, City aren't prejudiced by the outcome being out there. The appeal tribunal will decide it on its merits. I suspect you've listened to a media hungry lawyer.