egg

Hopefully the flappers will now stop flapping. Proper CF, and decent enough cover for big Ross. Nice.

I'm the same. He's a nothing player, but he's our player, and crazy to have overlooked him completely this season. Something has gone on, perhaps a fractured relationship with a senior player who's no longer here, but who knows.

Very happy with that. Unchanged team, and nice to see Edozie back involved.

I haven't. It's you who has labelled Starmer supporters (I'm not sure there's one on here btw) as paedophile supporters, and suggested that they like the idea of children being raped. You're a disgraceful human. I'm surprised that the mods haven't binned you off yet.

Run

SOG is further right than me so I'm intrigued...

Indeed, Turks is apparently futher left than Stalin, but anyone reading 3rd party comments on here would assume he makes Tommy Robinson look liberal.

Exactly. If someone is gonna be called a nonse, get the spelling right.

I didn't expect that tbh, although mine is much further left, and more libertarian than I expected. Chat GPT described me as "politically homeless, not politically confused" which is bang on as I know where I stand, but none of the parties speak my language at the moment.

Where have you got the stupid idea from that a) immigrants go around raping kids, b) that people who understand that we need immigration support the idea of children being raped? Your mind is as seedy as the country you apparently live in. To answer your question, no.

Interesting

Behave. It was racists, the gullible, and idiots. I qualified on ground 3.

Voting Brexit and supporting the ideology of Reform are vastly different things. For a start, Brexit had nothing to do with asylum seekers from outside the EU, ditto destroying our NHS, welfare state, etc, etc. You're better than that veiled attempt at equivalence.

We should respect people's right to choose, but we're not obliged to respect their choice. Sure, people can vote reform if they wish, but many people can't explain why beyond "we need change and less brown people", so it's perfectly reasonable to question their choice.

I know...repent at leisure etc.

Newspapers can't be dinlos. Journalists can. Neither of those headlines accord with Trump's actual words. Don't confuse spin and BS with facts.

There's something in that. I voted leave, don't ask, and made the wrong choice. Acknowledging that we should have remained is different to wanting to rejoin though. I'd need to understand how rejoining would look compared to how we could remodel our relationship with the EU. It needn't be a binary choice between going back as we were, or staying as we are.

It's subtle enough to make some dinlos think that he supports the deal. It's clearly a head shaking post, with at least a modicum of criticism of Starmer and the deal. I read the conclusion as being "it's all a bit stupid, but we ain't going anywhere, and if those idiots want to pay for what's now our island, crack on".

The knives are out for Starmer, so I think it's a kind of last straw thing. If he'd been performing well, I think the reaction wouldn't have been as extreme.

It's the "biggest scandal since Profumo" which tickled me. Feck me.

It's a judgement thing for me, and that leads to trust & confidence.

One of his MP's saying his position is untenable. Hard to disagree. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/czx3lq460n6t?post=asset%3Af788cad8-ca7a-4ec9-bd6b-3f1ab037579e#post

We were discussing this the other day and came to the same conclusion. If only fools ended after series 1, would it have had the same impact as fawlty towers? I doubt it.

We've had to endure unsolicited overreaction and thread spamming from you, so I'll post as I wish. Genuinely though, you're getting a tad hot under the collar.

It's a darn sight more logical than the masses wanting reform because everyone else is shit.