egg

I'd have him in there as well. 433. Control the midfield and play through it, not over it.

What's the lesser of two evils, that or tippy tappy playing out?

That's the only post that matters.

Looks like she trusted SR to pick her surgeon.

Stewart up top (if for enough to start) should have been one the first names in the team sheet. AA has been shoe horned in. If that was felt necessary, down the right would have made more sense.

That's a wild stretch of the imagination. It'll be 4231. I'd guess that Matsuki will tuck in at times, and also play this inside right channel, with Bree on the overlap where possible. I think there's a method to the madness.

Good point! Can only kill in cold blood when you're nice and warm.

Although I'd have played Fellows, Matsuki is an irritating little player, with a bit of flair, and plays on the half turn. Surprising selection, but not unsuited imo.

Agreed. Bree is the kind of character for a game like this. Proper RB. I'd have had Fellows ahead of him though, and Stewart up top. It looks to me that he wanted AA in there for whatever reason though, and picked the team around that. Anyways, it was it what is. Let's do this.

Which of the links shows people being attacked in their cars, kids rendered unconscious, us citizens being shot? My understanding - I may be wrong - is that Obama's crackdown was largely near the border returning people back to Mexico. I'm certainly not aware that ICE used the kind of tactics we've seen recently.

Duke

Correct, but the point applies equally to the vast majority of issues discussed in here. Our thoughts on Burnham standing, for example, won't have any bearing on whether he does, and what then happens if so. It feels a tad odd that the irrelevance of an individuals view is given less weight on one particular when the reality is that it carries no real weight on most others.

Whatever it was, he was left with nothing in his hands, and had his arms aloft. He was then taken to the ground. He was no threat when he was shot.

Commence

It seems pretty clear that there's as much obsession with you as here is with Trump. The focus on the personalities - you're at is as well - rather than the topic, does the forum no favours at all and is boring af.

Careful mate, some idiot will be along shortly to tell you that you're obsessed, or have TDS, or argue some false equivalence re Obama turning people back near the border. It's bewildering that people expect others to keep quiet about what is happening on Trump's watch. Hopefully the US will wake up to it, but I suspect it'll get worse before it gets better.

There speaks a man with a public service pension which is unaffected by significant world events.

Reinforcements

Yep. You've got to worry if your algorithms throw up pictures of men wearing yellow wellies.

Indeed. Whatever point Ralph was trying to make, it was a shit one. Person needing legal advice, takes legal advice. What a shock.

Long overdue. Leaders need to listen to, and adopt, what they likes of Carney and Newsom are saying. Enough already of pandering to the idiot.

Less reliance on US bonds is likely imo so I'll be moving away from my US and general long term bonds. He's ruined the US reputation for at least his term - loss of trust is a killer. Carney nailed it in his amazing speech, and Canada's approach is one that I think other countries, and investors, will adopt.

Agreed. The existing agreement means they can take it over from a military perspective. If he was simply saying that they shouldn't be expected to spend a fortune on their military whilst NATO partners don't bother, and be expected to bail them out when and if needed, it'd be hard to argue. If countries want equal protection under article 5, there shouldn't be disproportionate military spending. Re minerals, Greenland have said they can fill their boots. Fundamentally though, we and other NATO countries have placed over reliance on article 5, and essentially the US.

Agreed. We and Europe have relied on the US coming to our rescue under article 5, and spent significantly less on our military. Trump's only vaguely credible point re Greenland is that if it's invaded, it'll be the US at the heart of solving the problem.

The blokes a cretin. Just goes around the forum adding his daft emojis. Cue a laughing emoji from the idiot.