-
Posts
17,604 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by egg
-
Terrorist Attacks - WARNING: CONTAINS DISTRESSING IMAGES
egg replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
I get that. For me, this discussion about her is absurd. Simply, an old lady was murdered in her own home. Some people thought her decent, others not, others ambivalent. Anyone is entitled to feel whatever they like about her, and voice their view. The last couple of pages have been largely ridiculous. -
Terrorist Attacks - WARNING: CONTAINS DISTRESSING IMAGES
egg replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Pretty much this. Doctors receptionists too. They've annoyed me this week so cross the threshold. -
Terrorist Attacks - WARNING: CONTAINS DISTRESSING IMAGES
egg replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
People with questionable morals questioning the morals of others for questioning the morals of someone who has died is odd even by the SW standards. -
Terrorist Attacks - WARNING: CONTAINS DISTRESSING IMAGES
egg replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Are people now performing a posthumous character analysis of her to decide whether she has crossed a SW "cunt" threshold? Very odd thread is this. -
Terrorist Attacks - WARNING: CONTAINS DISTRESSING IMAGES
egg replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Who decides where the line is drawn though? I wouldn't have called the poor old girl a cunt whilst alive or dead, but if somebody felt it appropriate to call them that whilst alive, it's not totally inappropriate to call them that after they've died. Feels odd to me that people who've celebrated death, and/or refused to condone killers and bad regimes, are getting their knickers in a knot about someone speaking ill of the dead. -
Terrorist Attacks - WARNING: CONTAINS DISTRESSING IMAGES
egg replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
I don't know enough her opinions to know what she was about, but this thread appears to have become about the morals of expressing the same views of a person after they've died as you'd have expressed whilst they were alive. This forum has hardly been a place for unpopular people being granted a posthumous pardon. -
I've enjoyed the 48/3rd place - so many countries had something to play for in the final group game. We had 3rd place teams go through in 86, 90 and 94. When it went back to 2 through from 98, the group stages lost a bit of something for me. 64 is nonsense imo - just too big and it'll be a bit like the Olympic with some appalling mismatches. The world cup is meant to be the best of the world, not crap teams making up the numbers.
-
Anytime poppet x (Strange cunt)
-
Yes. You can't initiate a foul, or "brake test" players. It was a bloody tight call thou, and fortunately it doesn't matter.
-
I'd turned off. What did I miss?
-
Nice result, shit performance, but it's a results business so all good. No yellows either. James back. Morgan looking sharp. Spence looking half decent. Bring on Wednesday. Hopefully Kane will turn up.
-
Absolutely, he's been decent at both ends of the pitch. Driven us up the pitch several times.
-
James has been really solid. Glad he's back.
-
Yep. You don't need VAR to know that's the correct decision.
-
Pointless debate mate, we see it differently.
-
I wouldn't. I'd bring on Rashford and give us an outlet up the pitch, and pace to stretch them. Burn on invites sitting deep and pressure.
-
Yep. He brake tested him. Anyways, it's academic.
-
Spence initiated the contact for me by cutting across him.
-
I can't believe people thought that was a pen. We'd have gone batshit if that was given against us.
-
We need an injection of pace and energy. Rashford on.
-
Yep. Have a crack and see what happens.
-
Take a bow Bellingham. Looks fucked, then does that. Some player.
