egg

Kyle was 1/100 this morning to be Chancellor. Odds like that suggested it was done and leaked. Not sure what's happened, of anything. I said I was expecting a few curveballs, but Healey is Chancellor is proper curvy. It'll be interesting to see how the markets react in the morning.

Yep. I i don't like it. Parachuted in from a regional role, and brought in without any meaningful process. He's not had to anything about his policing, ajd doesn't have a mandate. That said, Starmer had failed, we needed something different, and hopefully he'll do something positive. Peter Kyle as chancellor though. Hmm.

Yep. I genuinely struggle to understand half of what he says. Needs to slow it down about so the English speaking people can understand him.

Rodri deserved that. Brilliant player

Nothing to see there. Odd.

Feels that way.

Eh? I'd stick to moaning about the BBC if I were you.

Yep. Brilliant. Not Shakira and her mates though.

I loved that. A real game of 4 quarters.

Ha!! 🥚🏆

Superb by Bellingham. He's been phenomenal since he came on. Some player.

Do we get a little cup for this?

I wouldn't mind another half an hour of this.

Saka looks fucked.

Yep. It's an awesome ad for soccerball.

This should be about 6 each.

Quansah is shocking. Went missing then. Again.

Fair to say France won the 3rd Quarter. Unless Rashford was injured, christ knows why he went off.

3/4 of that front 4 look very good.

I'll reprise part of my deleted comment...I don't think you have any life experiences to qualify you as having any actual knowledge of the reality. I do, from all sides. I can't be arsed as you avoid questions, but pose plenty, and most of your posts are AI / Google driven opinion pieces that suit your narrative. In short, I'm not wasting my time with you. Happy Saturday.

They have. Over time, Unions have a played a pivotal role in that, and rightly so. They've now been shaped, and that legal protection isn't going anywhere. Employees with union membership aren't a thorn in the side of employers in the way they were when are laws were archaic. The point that started the discussion, essentially, was that Union membership on its own, would make an employer feel differently about an employee. That's nonsense in my experience.

...

I get that, but if you take unions out of the equation, we're not going back to that or in danger of doing a UAE. The law restricts how employers can treat their staff, not the unions. Where I see their negative influence is in the rabble rousing we've seen with the likes of the junior doctors.

It's got nowt to do with you mate. The simple point is that as an employee my Union membership did not impact how my employer saw me or treated me, and as an employer it makes no difference to how I see or treat my staff. I'm interested in your life experiences which makes you believe that union membership leads to employers thinking negatively of their staff - your opinions seem to be based on perception and attitude.

What Farmer said...