egg

That's tempting, but the uncertainty over him wouldn't have helped us this season, and do we really want more of it.

That's because none of their offences were committed from behind a tree. They're small time.

And start again in the National League North. That'd be quite something. Bring it on.

Watch us be convicted of 116 breaches and retain our crown. 👑

2011? Your mate will ignore them as they had a left leaning motivation, and lacked any right leaning motivation.

Dont spy within 72 hours is about as grey as a black cat or a snowman. As for the millions on lawyers, jeez.

He's got nothing to lose that's for sure.

Sounds like the voice of experience.

And to roll the dice and hope that 12 good folk from Portsmouth acquit. He may well have an argument that, at the moment he slashed it, the dinghy was abandoned and didn't belong to another. Watch this space.

Ott, but it wouldn't be a surprise to the club.

Has it not been suggested that he left under a bit of a cloud?

That'd be about a dozen steps backwards.

Development

If I'd asked you a question, it would signify the start of a conversation. When I tell you, politely, that I think you're a whiny prick with a slightly skewed moral compass, I'm simply expressing my opinion. As you've chosen not to let this go, I'll also remark that it's slightly odd that you think that people must have a conversation with you because you insist, and that they should be expected to follow you down your various ridiculous rabbit holes. You'll note that I pose no question, which for clarity, means this isn't a discussion. It's me saying that I cannot be arsed to waste time conversing with you. I'm out of here. Adiós poppet.

I haven't asked for a debate - I'm not interested in your quest for equivalence. I've expressed my opinion on a specific point. It's done. Happy Friday.

I'm not sure what's hard to understand - the issue is closed for me.

I'm not debating it mate. I've expressed my opinion. Issue closed for me.

The issue is you not being to accept his charge on it's merits, and seeking equivalences. That's why you've pissed your panties. It's an incident on its own facts, charged proportionally. That's it.

I think it's inevitable he'll step up, at least until the end of the season. He's had a tough start with the under 21's but seems to be doing well. Personally, I like the idea with him stepping up and the rest of the coaching structure staying in place. It gives as much stability and continuity as possible.

And that ladies and gentlemen is why people are reluctant to pass on what they hear. I don't doubt he's heard something, and I don't doubt that it's a probably bit vague because things are happening, and/or he feels the need to be a bit vague as being specific could identify the source and get someone a kick in the bollocks.

Yep. I suspect he didn't mean any harm to the bloke on board, and although he arguably could have been charged with more, the simple criminal damage keeps things in perspective. It'll be interesting to see how he pleads, and what happens if me has the temerity to go not guilty.

Have a word with yourself mate. A bloke has been charged with criminal damage after being filmed causing criminal damage. That's it. That he did it, and some idiots being angry that he got charged, is the issue, nothing else.

You're embarrassing yourself getting so angry about it.

I don't know mate, but perhaps they saw him staying beyond that contract. Who knows. I don't.

What about, what about, etc. It's nauseating. People need to realise that this was bloody serious.