egg

Absolutely. The sad thing is that people read disingenuous nonsense like that and assume that something unusual / wrong has been done. Politics is fecked.

Yep, get the balls in, and Kane will burri-tos his chances.

Nah, Kane will tacos his chances so we'll be fine.

The airport.

That even looked quick in slow motion.

That was a special finish.

And to start of the Rice at RB experiment?

I told you Gordon was the answer, and that Kane should stay on. Or something.

Chalobah, Henderson, Burn.

I've always assumed that she is.

Yep. We looked much better last game with Bellingham in their and playing box to box. If he'd bothered to bring another 10 (Foden, Palmer, Gibbs-White), he would have had that option.

When Gordon is the answer, christ knows what the question is.

Yep. Keeps dropping off. We need a CF who'll stretch their defence and pull their CB's out of shape to create space.

Puncheon would have offered more than this bloke.

Have you seen the state of the crosses?

I hadn't notice that, but if the keeper charges at him, I think he's entitled to leave his leg in. Surely it's for the keeper making the challenge to avoid contact, not for Kane to get out of his way. Academic now anyways.

Yep. And movement. In the first half, only Bellingham, and to an extent Madueke and Spence, looked interested. Sadly only 1 of them offered any quality.

If our performance level increases 50%, we may become shit rather than utterly fucking shit.

I thought foul at first, but there was hands on so a pen for me.

Under appreciated post... although you missed a few.

I'm trying to work out which of our back 4 is the worst. Absolute shit show out there.

Our players look clueless out there. Zero movement.

Yeah, although the CB's were in a poor position. That was a defensive/GK disaster.

I get that, but take that Kane ball to him then. His touch and use of the ball wasn't that of an international winger. Shite.

Nope, he's a lower PL level winger for me.