egg

Our two second half goals have been brilliant. Great subs from Tuchel too. Rice was getting sloppy, Bellingham was done, the wingers weren't effective, Saka and Rashford needed minutes. Very good night.

Bellingham looks done.

If this was a boxing fight the ref would have stopped it after the last 10 mins. How we haven't scored I don't know.

Kane as a midfielder would be phenomenal.

Rice spotting his run but playing back after that lovely bit of play they highlighted in the ad break was ridiculous.

He's had a shocker. I think it was him who got sat down in the build up to their goal and just sat on his arse.

Ditto. I'd have taken Palmer and used him on the right when Saka is out.

Madueke goes from having a final ball to not having a clue the next. Infuriating player.

Alas, that's what we're dealing with. It's an "anything else will do" attitude, without any thought or concern as to what the anything else actually is.

Median

Ditto. Nowt worse than a poster who won't answer simple questions about their own posts, or link to their claims. He's either a troll or conspiracist who's lost down a rabbit hole. I suspect the latter.

Beast

A pro arm wrestler called Dirk from Michigan I've heard. It was on X so it's definitely true.

This is tiresome, and that's not a link. Please just say whether the part you highlighted and I commented on is a claim or a finding. It's a really simple question, which you can answer "claim" or "finding". If that's it's the latter, please provide an actual link - you could have screen shot anything. Re Starmer, the report doesn't say that he covered up or minimised the rape gang stuff. If you say otherwise, post up an actual link to the evidence of your claim.

That doesn't address the question, which I asked as I genuinely wanted to know if the comment you highlighted was a finding from any enquiry, or a claim. What's the answer, please? Re Starmer, where does the report say that he "minimised it" or "covered it up"? That's a serious allegation, and you'll have to link me to the findings in the report which supports your claim. It doesn't say that though, but this is your claim, so support it please.

Are those findings or claims? Regardless, as commendable as it is that Lowe pushed hard for the investigation, anyone seeking to lay the blame for these hideous gangs at the door of Starmer or Khan is beyond pathetic. Additionally, you've got to question why anyone would believe that Rupert Lowe is the saviour of the UK and the working man.

So spending as little money as possible is more important to you than spending an appropriate amount of money to get an appropriately run state. What an odd outlook.

Nope. You'll just get another twitter echo chamber claim, again unsubstantiated.

The only relevant stat.

How's your freedom being impacted by identifying yourself, then doing the thing that you want to do freely? How's it dangerous? Draconian, not even close, and safeguards aren't authoritarian, they're safeguards.

Absolutely. If nothing else, kids aren't learning how to communicate face to face, and have an entirely distorted view of reality. Something has to be done, although I'm not sure what.

It's just a way of creating a 4 quarter game as per American football to squeeze in adverts. Watch this space for whether it carries on after the world cup.

Syndrome

It's welfare, and completely different to a "any pension scheme" - you neither save nor have a a defined benefit. All your NI payments do is gain you an entitlement to some form of state pension at a variable date in the future, and go in the pot as per any tax. None of us started paying NI with a contract to get a guaranteed amount, at a guaranteed date, with a guaranteed annual increase. It's bizarre that people talk as if that's what they've done.

I'll take the non answer to mean that you want the triple lock for the state pension to stay, as you get it, but that shouldn't apply to any other form of welfare.