egg

You've confirmed what I've posted - you oppose assisted suicide, but do not oppose capital punishment. Yet you cannot understand the logic of someone having the reverse view. You appear to have an issue with respecting people having differing opinions to you. That's the nub of it.

I've no idea what he is, but we know more about him to make a judgement than we do about strangers on a forum, and discussing him is more interesting than seeing the same old bollox being perpetually written about the same posters.

Err, but you support the state taking lives of criminals, but oppose people being able to take their own when dying. In other words, you're saying that taking your own life when dying isn't ok, but having your life taken by the state is ok. Right you are.

What's not feminine about Jeeta?

Jutta Leerdam though

I was once told by a senior mental health practitioner that people who label others as narcissistic, usually are themselves. Make of that what you will.

That's bizarre, even by your standards. Killing criminals isn't remotely comparable to terminally ill people choosing to commit suicide.

Google "miscarriages of justice".

Easily?! No, and how does that address doubt appearing after the event such as has happened with miscarriages of justice? Say it's discovered that witnesses lied or fabricated evidence that was so compelling that there was no doubt? What then if the accused is dead? Anyway, it's a non point as there's zero prospect of the death penalty even being discussed at a serious level.

I get that, but there's a conflation of issues in there. Society needs fixing, I agree, but solving societal issues to reduce possession and use of knives, at best, will take time. If not punishment, what do you suggest as a deterrent in the interim?

There have been multiple cases down the years where it was felt that there was zero doubt, only to be proven otherwise years after the event. Miscarriages of justice happen, and thankfully we're more civilised than to reintroduce the death penalty.

And phase 2, I suspect, will be to give the green light to Israel to annexe the west bank. The fella makes Putin look restrained.

Yep. We'll never stop the supply of knives (anyone can pay £3 for a drywall knife from Screwfix, for example) so sentences need to be tough on this, with zero tolerance. That said, there is nobody to pull the kids up and search them. Society is shot.

It's interesting for sure. The case against her never looked particularly strong, lots of it was circumstantial. The fact that she researched the families of the deceased though, and kept records of the deaths, was plain bizarre and must have played a part in removing any meaningful doubt from the jurors minds. Horrible case.

Wren are preferred by people I know in the trade. They'll design as well.

I'm not sure anyone has seen any of those 4 as the answer for the rest of the season, so I'm not sure why their departure is suddenly an issue. That said, SAA going surprised me.

Indeed. 'Safe havens' like tobacco giants BAT and imperial brands attracting investors legging it from tech stock, and people getting on the Smiths Group ahead of them being broken up, are not signs of support for British businesses.

When there's evidence that's happened, there's a conversation to be had. Until then, you sound Trump esque.

Your point is a non point if perfectly competent people have got the jobs.

Unless you're making the point that the policies have led to people getting jobs that they shouldn't get, what is your point?

A bitter lad complaining that he didn't get a job doesn't equate to incompetent people getting the job.

That's some daft baiting Weston. For all SoG's faults, if any posters revel I'm the death and destruction of Palestinians, it's not him.

It should. Some on here would probably argue that Hamas got what they deserve. We all agree that Israeli's didn't deserve what happened to them that day on October, and most of us seem to agree that innocent Palestinians didn't deserve what's happened to them and their land since.

Very good 😊 😂

Yep. Lordshill had all of that and more once upon a time. Now it's Sainsbury's only, plus a Starbucks. I hate to think how it'll be in 10 years from now.