egg

Got a link to the website mate? I'll have some of that.

The World Jewish Congress are nearly as pro - Israel as you are mate, hardly an objective authority. And top marks for mistaking the target of the criticism 👏

We'll agree to differ. Electing to see one post from one person is not taking them off ignore. I'm not addressing the second point. I've made my position clear on making those kind of allegations, but can understand wanting to look at a posters posts from time, and on certain subjects, rather than seeing all of them.

It doesn't work like that. You can just look at a post. I've had one poster on ignore from time to time cos I find him/her irritating. Every now and again I'll look at a post, and even engage. The ignore function just means that by default I don't directly see their posts. I'm not with you on this, and it's a weak stick to beat someone with imo. Where I am with you is that FS is a disgrace calling anyone on here what he has. That's unacceptable and poor form.

It's a more realistic level than the PL.

Slow day. I can't be doing with dishonest trolls though. Movie now on.

Nobody suggested anything was edited out. Just you. H&W, correctly, highlighted what you changed (added).

Oh of course, resurrecting a thread a day later, and tagging various people who have left you alone, and asking that they leave you alone is exactly what someone who wants to be left alone does. Of course.

Understanding analogies require lateral thought Matthew, so they are lost on you.

"Please play with me egg, please". No Mathew, you're a prick, fuck off.

He's not the same, he's got worse. Today's post was akin to an unpopular kid pleading with the other kids to play with him whilst trying to pop their football. Tragic.

I like a bit of comedy mate, so I'll politely decline your orders.

I missed it amongst the waffle...why the feck you didn't clarify that about a million posts ago I don't know. Awkward prick.

Jesus fecking wept. I'm off out for the evening. Adiós.

Your post wasn't yes or no. You've typed about 500 words across multiple posts. Stop being daft and say yes or no. If you insist on asking people to answer questions in a binary manner, either have the courtesy to reciprocate or shut up.

Nonsense. The Wright Brothers could have failed or succeeded, ie polar opposites. They took a leap of faith.

I'm not interested in your daft games. I'll revert to what we both know is the truth, namely that you agree that they took a leap of faith but cannot concede that here.

It's a hypothetical one. I live in the real world.

Do tell...pretty please 🙏

Jury's have to draw conclusions or inferences. In civil cases the Judge's function is often to make findings of fact, but in so doing he/she must imply, impute or infer evidence. Your world appears binary. The real world isn't, and faith is put in people, and what they say, even in court rooms.

It's a Yes or no Matthew. I'll take the unwillingness to answer as "yes, I know it was a leap of faith, but I'm desperately trying to avoid admitting that because my ego won't allow me to".

No, you have. And just you.

So taking a leap of faith. Thank you.

Yes or no, do you acknowledge that they took a leap of faith?