Jump to content

stknowle

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    4,336
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by stknowle

  1. He started doing well but he was not exceptional at anything. Form totally nosedived after the City game. He needs to get his nut down, work hard and stop ****ing moaning at his team mates.
  2. Oh dear. Gone by next summer latest. Thing is his stock has risen and ours has gone down since he signed. Things have changed a lot not least the appointment a new uninspiring manager playing negative football leading to nights like last night which are hardly likely to inspire him to ignore reported interest from huge clubs willing to double his wages. I'm struggling to identify reasons that he would want to stay.
  3. These are facts that no-one can realistically argue with. Our new manager has turned us into a boring and ineffective football team.
  4. stknowle

    Puel out

    Some right planks on here.......
  5. As others have said, what can it do for team morale if a player keeps ****ing up, keeps getting picked, and keeps moaning at others for "****ing up". Very little I would suspect.
  6. Absolutely. ****** moaning at other players like he never puts a foot wrong when in fact he rarely puts one right.
  7. stknowle

    Puel out

    If I was to wake up tomorrow morning to be informed that Puel had decided the job was too big for him and handed his resignation I would be pleased. First manager I could say that about since George Burley.
  8. stknowle

    Puel out

    I wasn't saying that and I'm not that fickle. I want to see some ****ing passion in this team, would rather Puel inspired it than needing to get someone else in to do it but is he capable of inspiring it? Jury 100% out but leaning strongly towards not guilty.
  9. If they were being racist that is an absolute fecking disgrace. You should have reported them.
  10. stknowle

    Puel out

    Yes, it is cra@p. Absolute cr@p. I have had no genuine reason to complain about SFC and our football since the year we went down from the Championship and even then there were mitigating circumstances. Puel needs to sort it the **** out but I really am not sure he can and or will.
  11. stknowle

    Puel out

    Anyone supporting his removal will probably be accused of being a bedwetter but his stock in trade appears to be boring, safety first, defensive football. If that is what he wants to persist with then he can **** off because it's not what I want to see. I don't understand how and why we have reverted to this shyte after going for it against both Everton and Arsenal (yes a weak Arsenal), playing well and looking good. It suggests to me that he is most comfortable playing this cr@p so, again, he can **** off.
  12. He sets us out to play in this negative, boring, conservative way. It's tedious and there's nothing telling him we have to play like that even if we do have poor options up front.
  13. Ha ha yeah, bit of a change of tune there.
  14. Yes we really are boring. I almost feel ripped off watching a free stream.
  15. Game over. Good shot tbf, but we didn't need to be in this position. Puel is really starting to rile me.
  16. Bertrand's crossing has been bad today.
  17. Redmond is trying but doesn't really look like creating anything. The thing that annoys me most about him is his whinging and berating of others.
  18. Hmmmm it's 1 star flat n' crap Saints again so far. This conservative cautious approach just does not suit us. I guess if we see it out 0 0 it will have served it's purpose but I'm getting tired of seeing us play like this. So uninspiring.
  19. Agree with this. Yoshida's done well this season but no way would I want him as our 'safe' 2nd centre back.
  20. Genuinely interested to know how this vid was protected against being copied onto a format that did not exist when it was made. Good goal btw.
  21. I have to say I have no idea what you are talking about.
  22. I tell you what Heisenberg, you might just have something here. It all adds up when you think about it. I'm a bit annoyed to be honest but I'm still happy to have a club.
  23. Why the hell would we 'tie' him to a new 'long term' contract which included a transfer clause allowing him to leave for less than he was already worth in the next transfer window?
×
×
  • Create New...