Lord Duckhunter

You’re right they’re s good side. Tony Pulis has been saying all season they’re good enough to go up and Coventry aside, are the best side in the league. I know people will say, he’s a dinosaur etc, but he’s been around football a long time and his opinion is as valid as anyone’s. There’s no doubt in my mind that us and them are head and shoulders above the other 2, on our days. And that’s the point, the winner of this tie should go up, but if we don’t produce our best on Tuesday, it won’t be us.

That’s going to be some game tomorrow. Rangers have had a shite season but if they can beat Celtic tomorrow, Hearts can win the title by beating Falkirk at home next week. Next to winning the title, depriving Celtic of it is the next best thing.

That, and the fact that the club have basically admitted there’s something in it. Of you honestly believe the club would have issued the statement they did if there was absolutely nothing in it, you’re deluded….Its not some innocent bird watcher or dog walker randomly wandering around who has mistakenly be identified as a Southampton employee…

What a load of old pony. “First half went to plan” 😂. If that’s the case it was a fucking stupid plan. “ Let’s keep giving the ball away, allowing crosses, let our centre forward be beaten in every physical battle and rely on their poor finishing to go in 0-0”. We got away with one there, and despite have 2 excellent efforts, could well have gone in 2 or 3 down. Completely different game then, and they’d have sat in and made it very very difficult. Probably edged the second half, but god the first half we were lucky they couldn’t finish. Larin was appalling, as was Fellows. Azaz anonymous up there again, and Leo was a long way from his best. Keeper did well again as did THB. Completely different game Tuesday and we must be slight favourites. However, if we play like we did first half, I don’t think we’ll get away with it again.

The whole thing is pathetic, from their fans reactions to our fans trying to claim they wouldn’t be bothered if the boot was on the other foot. Dear god, there’s not a match thread without demands for a red card or the ref has an agenda against us. Our nods would have reacted in exactly the same way there’s have. It’s also pathetic from the club and/or the individual. If he acted alone, he needs to get a life & if the club instructed him, that’s pretty fucking pathetic really. IMO, it’s probably a mixture of both and a bit of a grey area. I can’t believe nobody at the club knew, but equally, I’m pretty sure senior staff wouldn’t have signed off on this. I guess the case boils down to plausible deniability, and I smell a compromise coming up. Let’s not forget the bloke got caught 2 days ago, so Boro have 2 days to change tactical stuff, and he legitimately could have watched preparation for Tuesdays game. It’s not as if this has come out after the game, they were fully aware and could react to it. IF the result of both legs is close, with us going up on penalties, after extra time or by one goal, then perhaps it’ll run a bit longer. If we batter them, it’ll become a non story and we’ll get a slap on the wrist type fine. It’s hard to see Gibson arguing it made a difference, if we’ve dicked them 5-1 on aggregate. He’ll make himself look a right chump. The only way we’ll face a major issue is if other sides come forward with some evidence we’ve done it before, which begs the question, why didn’t they report it at the time. my gut feeling is Saints admitting a slight technical breach of the rules in return for a fine and maybe suspended points deduction. The technical breach being an employee/free lance bod acted without the knowledge of any senior management

Lowe isn’t in Reform, for a bloke criticising people “don’t understand” you’re pretty dopey yourself. From Reforms last election campaign. “Reform UK officially states they will keep the NHS "free at the point of delivery.” The UK isn’t particularly free at the point of delivery anymore than the French is, what are prescription charges? You have to pay before you receive treatment. Yet you’re critical of the French health service , which is far better than ours, based solely on the fact Nige is a supporter of it. Ridiculous position to be in, all that matters is our health care is improved. There’s a reason no other country copies ours. This is the problem, trying to debate our horrendous health service, dinosaurs like you are stuck in the 1940’s and won’t consider any other system. Though at the end of the day, if the people vote for it, that’s what they’ll get.

Total bollocks.

Greens celebrating taking Hackney.

Looks like the gullible labour voters from 2024 have realised that’s what they were.

When did this “on the grass” pony come from. FFS, what’s wrong with “back in training”. I’ve noticed it creeping into the game, fucking hipster pony.

Nothing mad about it at all, those are the rules. It wasn’t a penalty.

You’re half right, I’ll give you that. I thought this was a settled subject, but no there’s still a couple of Japanese soldiers willing to keep on fighting Baz’s corner. The most ridiculous being that Baz has somehow contributed to us reaching the play offs. I guess he has, alongside Will Still & Damian Downes 😂😂. Well done, and thanks Baz, where would our season have ended without you…

Only because he got injured… Does anybody seriously believe we’d have gone up if he hadn’t. Are you really going to claim he’s got another promotion, if we go up this season 😂😂

“Average” there you go again exaggerating his ability. If he improves considerably, works hard, learns to organise a bit, toughens up a bit and gains experience, he may just reach the dizzy heights of “average”. Personally, I think that’s a step too far for him, but you never know.

Not just the Greens. We’ve had Tory MP’s talking about “punishment”, a Lib Dem saying that “decent people” will fight this, and of course the Labour Party. Even on here posters have said they’re “punishing” non reform voters. It’s a fucking great big elephant trap and the “migrants welcome” mob have fallen right into it. Great move the week of local elections.

So it’s ok to put illegals migrants into some areas but not others. 😂 Typical, it’s always the same. Immigrants welcome, just not near where I live. Let someone else have the “mayhem”. You’ve got people who support immigration, going on about “punishing” areas by putting immigrants there. I thought welcoming immigrants was a good thing, 😂. Now it’s a punishment. Well done to reform, they’ve shone a light on the absolute hypocrisy of the “immigrants welcome” mob. If you vote green, you’re voting for open borders, not open borders, provided they’re not near me. Personally, I’d have MP’s given a free vote on whether they’re housed in their constituencies, the pony excuses will be a delight to see.

Absolutely spot on policy. I’ve posted before that the Government should have a free vote on where asylum seekers are “welcome” and where they can be housed. Watch the hypercritical lefties come out with all sorts of pony as to why they can’t be housed in their constituency. This is local accountability in action, if they’re going to build detention centres, build them where local people want them. Your vote will mean something, you’ll get what you voted for, what’s not to like. Of course, illegal migrants are only “welcome” if they live somewhere else. The Green Party’s new deputy leader Rachel Millward has been branded a “hypocrite” after she shared her “strong objection” to the placement of 600 asylum seekers in her leafy £500,000 local area. In her shared role as Zack Polanski’s subordinate, Ms Millward proudly declared she would hang “the flags of all the nations” to celebrate that “refugees are welcome here”. Despite her previous enthusiasm, Ms Millward expressed her concerns about the use of Crowborough Army Camp to house migrants in a letter to Labour’s Home Office Minister Mike Tapp.

If you have to house less people, will that help as well?

Because the referee made a clear and obvious error. VAR should have corrected that error, but didn’t. So therefore also made an error. Is it really that difficult to understand?

Absolutely it was, but that isn’t what is being alleged. The usual suspect was posting pony claiming the Israeli government let it happen so they could attack Gaza. I was in Israel at the time and the feeling was Netanyahu and the people charged with defending the state had taken their eye off the ball and were too complacent. Anybody who thinks the Israeli government, the IDF or Mossad would deliberately allow this, doesn’t understand the Israeli people or their psyche.

It depends whether they think they’re a better side or not. The best side will win over 2 legs pretty much all the time. Sheffield Utd won 16 more points than Sunderland (had 2 deducted), outplayed them for all but about 15mins of the play off final, and somehow lost. Had that been over 2 legs, they’d have beaten them. No bother… So are they saying 2 legs are better because their quality will overcome us and there’s less likely to be a freak result, or is it some sort of weird logic that the best way to beat a better side, is to play them twice…

Fucking hell, I don’t know what’s more annoying the dopey bird on co commentator or Ref Cam