Lord Duckhunter

He’s brilliant.

Apologies, the plank thing was uncalled for. In normal situations do you think most people should vote in person, proving who they are. That only people physically incapable of doing so, should have a postal vote.

Siri show me someone making a fool of themselves by posting something inaccurate, straight after posting “get your facts straight”.

And that is why players exaggerate contact and go down easy. Sterling stays on his feet, and city end up 1-0 down .

Course it would go on you plank, he’s not going to give up the fight. Just as the sweatys who want to leave the UK continue to fight for that aim and remain supports will fight to leave . What is different is people using parliamentary and legal proceedings to stop the vote from being enacted in the first place . Anyone who thinks Gina Miller, Grievence and other assorted euro headbangers were only interested in ensuring a correct & orderly Brexit is deluded, they were trying to tie the process in knots until the whole thing was abandoned. If they could have got away with it, they’d have stopped it dead. As for Trump there is absolutely no doubt there’s been fraud, and that postal voting is nowhere near as “clean” as turning up on the day. There will be examples of dead people voting, of people voting numerous times, of “community leaders” harvesting votes, and other dodgy practises. These won’t make any difference to the result & nothing has been stolen from Trump. However, there is the wider issue that these things should be unacceptable, to turn a blind eye because they’re not election changing is complacent and wrong. Something needs doing about it if only to reassure the losing parties. Turning up at the polls, unless you’re physically unable to, and proving you are who you say you are, should be the bare minimum required. You have to ask yourself why certain parties seem to think this is an outrageous thing to propose.

Some of our fans are just as embarrassing, my wife’s Facebook feed was full of planks giving it large.

What happens when the Lino thinks it’s offside? For all we know the Lino thought Bamford was offside. If you think limiting VAR to 30 seconds will change anything you’re deluded. If Liverpool have a goal ruled out against City , that 32 seconds later is subsequently shown to be onside by .05mm, is Klopp going to say “fair play it’s an offside”. No they’ll then be pundits stating that the correct decision is all that matters, and why couldn’t they wait 2 seconds. An example will be dragged out showing an offside changed after 29 seconds, and they’ll be banging on about 3 seconds. The simplest way is for everyone to accept that offside is black or white, on or off. You can either have VAR deciding that, or go back to Lino doing so.

Who said I agreed with it, I was pointing out the fact he was offside. We also don’t know what the Lino would have given with no VAR. all the moaning about how close it was assumes that the Lino thought it was on. Because they’re told to “play on”, we don’t know . What if the Lino thought it was off by a bit more than it was? I didn’t want var. But in this instance it’s done it’s job. It disallowed an offside goal. As for Haller, it’s subjective. In my opinion he was interfering, the officials obviously thought otherwise.

His legs/body/head aren’t the only thing you can score with. You can score with parts of your upper arm/ shoulder , so you and Bamford are wrong.

Making our own rules up now are we? You might not like it, but he was offside. Last season he wouldn’t have been, but because there was such a song and dance about handballs the handball law was changed. This is one of the unintended consequences of that rule change.

Offside is a line decision, line decisions in cricket aren’t umpires call.

Bit like Gina Miller then.

They changed the handball rule because of constant complaints, so now the upper arm to where a short sleeve ends isn’t handball. The knock on effect of this is you can now score with your upper arm sleeve, therefore that part of your arm can be called offside. The basic thing people can’t seem to get their head round is offside isn’t subjective. It’s a fact, you’re either onside or off. There’s no “clear & obvious”,no benefit of the doubt. It’s one reason I didn’t think VAR was a good idea, and nothing that’s happened since has made me change my mind.

Don’t talk pony. You can still be sent off.

You’d be the first moaning if a legitimate goal was ruled out by an early flag. You’re as bad as the plums on BT banging on about it. VAR can’t just be used for correcting Lino’s that have missed an offside, it also corrects decisions where the Lino thinks it’s offside ( for example Gabbi at Wembley ), how do you propose it does that without playing on?

No , I’ll cry about it for years, call you all thick twats, and wallow in pious righteousness.

We’ve watched some right wankers the past few years, good players but wankers. This bunch are a credit to the club & deserve every piece of praise they’ve received lately. JWP finally looks a proper player, Vestergaard & Adams have both shown a fantastic attitude to turn their Saints careers around & Theo seems to love being back at the club. Jack Stephens deserves a mention, rough patch of form and out of position, but he did ok. Everyone at least 8/10 tonight.....

Who the US president is has never made a blind bit of difference to my life, including when I was resident out there. The only difference this one will make is slightly spoiling my hobby of laughing at lefties. Still plenty of opportunities ahead with Brexit finally approaching, and I’m sure Biden will give us plenty of laughs.

Not me, I only know what Biden told us. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MA8a2g6tTp0

Agreed. Even a 119 year old who had been dead since 1984 voted. That’s dedication for you.

He’s behaving exactly as millions of lefties & pinkos did last time. Needs to man up. Let’s hope it he gets over it quicker than they did.

What a load of pony.

Why were hospital staff at the snap dragons hospital issued with a 3 page email detailing how to wear masks properly and how to dispose of them. It was stated that continued touching of mask & continued pulling it on and off would be worse for you general health, than not wearing one. It also clearly stated that anyone not disposing of masks correctly, would be increasing the risk of infecting their colleagues. This wasn’t just clinical staff, but everyone. Do you think the general public wear & dispose of masks correctly? And if not, surely that’s worse for their general health & increasing the risk of infecting others?

It’s strange that there seems to be a correlation between those who voted remain & the stay at home wankers who pretend to care for the working man, but don’t really give a fuck.

Without Rickie, Ings wouldn’t be playing for us. We’d still be in championship. It’s not always about the best players, Ings is clearly a better top flight player, but rickie was the better signing. I heard Lawrie say Peter Osgood was his best signing because the message it sent out. Same with signing Rickie. Top top signing at that time and we never looked back.