benjii

Why don't you start a website?

It's nothing to do with Aviva IMO. Sounds like they've been nothing but reasonable all along and reading between the lines, it's Barclays that are driving the agenda.

Well, indeed. One of several signs. No doubt "Dubai Phil" or some acolyte will now come on and post about how ****ed he is in Dubai on some god-awful ****tail that most people stopped drinking soon after they left uni.

That's more like Jackson type than Dubai Phil type IMO.

I think a new owner will be put off by "look at me threads". There's no evidence for this, but it is fact.

This is where the consequences of the FL making up rules on an ad hoc basis may come to haunt them as there is a danger of getting into a completely intractable mess on this one.

I seriously wouldn't bother doing that on Pompey. You're buying a timebomb full of **** regardless.

Haaaaaa haaaaa! :lol: I remember that: "it's fine really. It's the ****ing plinth knackering the perspective". Haha. Haaaa!!!!! Crying with laughter at the time. Look at his funny little hand with the ball. AAgghhh!!!

:lol: Always.

It's funny because I was expecting a magnanimous and well-reasoned post from Jonah.

When a deal is agreed, perhaps there's something to be said for the football club going through a pre-pack admin first. It ought to be possible to ensure that a CVA can then be sorted, just in case the FL have some dastardly plan. Mind you, they'll probably retrospectively invent a rule that imposes a 1,000,000,000 point penalty on clubs going through pre-pack admins.

I've no idea, but unless the football club itself goes into admin it can't have a CVA. If the FL go down the route that the PLC needs one they really are a bunch of ****s. It's a ridiculous rule anyway as it's entirely out of the control of the entity in administration. It's retarded.

There will be no CVA. CVA's are a mechanism for exiting administration. The PLC will not exit administration. It is going to be wound up. The administrator is trying to sell the assets owned by the PLC.

I think it is absolutely disgusting that people are willing to make a laughing stock of this poor chap.

You can sue the NHS for negligence (or more specifically, you will sue whichever trust operates the hospital you attended I expect). You will need to show they were negligent though. Solicitors can advise on the merits of your claim. You will not get a more useful answer than that on here. HTH.

Post 90? http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?p=299719#post299719

Re Ali Dia Yes, Souness made an embarassing **** up. However he hauled Dia off and we never saw him again. If Lowe had been responsible for Ali Dia he would have started every match for the rest of the season, been heralded as "the new Pele" and Peter Beagrie or Ally McCoist or someone would have been paraphrased saying nice things about him in the Annual Report.

I've shat all over my lounge. Nothing to do with the joke though.

Well, as long as you're happy with your purse, that's the main thing.

Yes, we can certainly take solace in that. I like to do my bit for morale.

It may be that the prospect of Pinnacle entering a lock-out period has driven the mystery foreigners to place a better offer. Or it maybe that Pinnacle aren't up to much. Or it maybe that things simply aren't done yet. Or it might be something else.

A woman! No chance. Not even Lowe would be that deranged.

...

Not enough goals scored and vulnerability from set-pieces cost us. Nothing to do with SMS - we were just crap at the key moments and it's a strange quirk of fate that we did better away IMO. I don't think we played noticably better away we just converted our chances a bit better. I suppose you could say that might be down to there being less pressure away; but this would apply whether or home ground was the Dell, St Mary's, Bernabeu or the Silverlake!

I'd love it if we appointed a good manager, really love it.