benjii

TBH I expect it costs less in salary but that's not really the point is it? It's fecking sheee-ite. That's the point.

All I mean is that Monday's press conference has been called to discuss the JP/Wotte situation. It hasn't been called as a response to the very valid questions being posed on here. I'm no journo but I think there is a certain amount of playing by the rules of the game on these things. I suppose the questions could be phrased to keep them within the set parameters, ie: "What role did Kim van der Waal play in the resignation of JP and the appointment of Wotte?"

Does this person have a mobile status symbol, the location of which I may track on the internetz?

To be honest, I'm sure these are all questions that have occured to the Echo. They may consider it to be imprudent to ask some of them however.

Apparently he knows George Weah.

I can confirm that Skacel will be signing next week.

Rupert, is it acceptable to wear hunting socks that clash with one's cravat?

The media do still care about us. Pretty pointless dig though - implies JP not given a fair crack when most people think he was well past his sell by date.

When the plc chairman is part-time, the football club chairman is a tax exile, the other plc execs are the non-exec Cowan and the dubious Jones - "Mr Continuity" - I suppose this makes sense If there wasn't something odd going on then why is it such a big secret? PS - I understand the need for sensitivity but can you confirm if your source is a "neutral" (ie. playing staff, other club staff) or a "interested party" (ie. McMenemy, Crouch, Merrington etc)?

Professor of idiocy?

Are you seriously trying to say there were better loanees available than Pekhart, Robertson and Gasmi and that we could have used our money better than by signing Pulis, Smith and Forecast? Do you all live in Cloud Cuckoo land or something?

Fine. But the point the Hoddleites forget is that there were plenty of other good managers around who could have been appointed other than Sturrock. It wasn't a case of, "if we can't have Hoddle it has to be Sturrock". The ommission of Hoddle is irrelevant. It is no more significant in our decline than the ommission of Jose Morinho, Barry Fry or Brian Clough. The board got the decision wrong and then followed it up by an even worse one (Wigley).

According to Wiki they were thinking of linking up with Wolves in some sort of feeder capacity. Maybe that fell through and we're proposing something along those lines? All a bit odd. A far cry from the days of sell-out mid-season friendlies against Bayern Munchen anyway!

That would indeed be the final nail in the "we had no choice but to sack a popular, young manager and replace him with a useless nobody" line and would prove beyond any reasonable doubt what a useless prat Lowe is.

I don't know if it's escaped you but the team has been very well supported at home all year and has been ****e. Thank goodness most people are not as banal as you.

Rupert the ****.

Nah.

I simply cannot abide his ****ing hair. This is a complete ****ing disgrace. I'm ****ing livid.

"I sorry I ruin the party"

Does he know how to score then?

c) "Kim" - WTF?

Yep, just referred to that on another thread. What a load of ********. Next they'll be telling us Archie Gemmil nutmegged him.

I like that one. Like the doting mother, "he's a special little boy".

Is that an admission that Rupert needs to look at the scoreboard to figure out what the score is?