benjii

There were several worse teams than us when we got relegated. They have got 0 points from home games against Fulham, Bolton and Everton. That is very poor. They haven't played any of the top 3 yet, home or away. They aren't that awful but they will run out of time pretty quickly. If Wolves beat them next week they are 90% likely to go down IMO.

What? You really do post some weird things.

Crikey - I haven't read the whole thread... are some people actually saying that? I listened to the whole match and we did create loads of pressure.

What nonsense.

Undoubtedly Carlisle need to recruit a new sports psychologist.

Great post!

100 years is nothing up there. The hills have eyes.

To give Leitch his dues, he is much more informative than Dave Merrington who, nice bloke aside, says virtually nothing of interest. Ever.

Given that Rasiak is a very good Champsionship level goalscorer playing for a good Championship team, I suggest getting used to Rasiak scoring.

He certainly has a voice for the written media.

Sounded like they played pretty well second half. I think Nugent would have put a couple of those chances away

TBH, I think we should be looking to dominate the game and James offers us more than Perry on the ball. If their left winger is big and strong then we may wish Thomas was playing though. Anyone know anything about Carlisle's left winger?!

Eh? Do you mean right?

in the Premier League? Just wondering.

I have a feeling Mellis could have a good game today actually. Don't know why - just do!

Off the line! A mighty 18,000+ today though so fair play, the giant is awakening.

Yeah, in theory it could be great but if Mellis, Mills and Lallana don't work out what they need to do and when it could be a pretty dire afternoon. Will also be important for Hammond to get up and help out Lambert IMO to give the three mentioned above a platform to play from.

As no Mod appears arsed to make a match sticky thread.... ------------------KD------------ James----Trotsky----Jaidi-----Harding Mellis---SPiderspvigs----Hammond----Mills -------------Lallana------------ -------------Lambert-----------

Yes, indeed. What a tedious old drone.

I agree. An Alan Ball stand would be perfectly apt and sensible. Much better than naming a stand after some ****-hole part of town.

Has the Barcelona reconnaisance mission finished yet?

FFS.

Yes, EXACTLY. So how do you draw up the legal test to make sure that people like the Dando suspect are not murdered by the state? You either make the threshold so high that it is hardly ever used or you engender a situation where every conviction is followed by a further mini-trial dealing with the level of "doubt" and where some people will fall the wrong side of the line incorrectly. It comepletely flies in the face of the prevailing legal system of the country where no reasonable doubt is supposed to remain in any case.

Well, I had a sense of certainty from the media reports and the fact that there was no suggestion that the conviction was unsound. Obviously, it would be up to the judge and/or jury to make the call having sat thorugh the trial. But let's say that it is one case where you could be pretty sure you're murdering the right person if you execute him. But how do you formalise it? That is my point. Yes there are some obvious cases. But we're talking about the law. You need a test. What is it and how do you escape from the fact that wherever you draw the line there will be cases on the edge of it.

I like the look of that - we have the quality to play an attacking set up.