Dark Munster

Pub level football. But the skates are so proud of their Granddads.

Sooner than England doing it again, then?

As well as being a cheat, Keita is also an idiot: by having Kaka sent off he is helping Portugal (their rivals for 2nd place) in their final match against Brazil.

Hands up anyone who thinks Heskey should be in the team on Wednesday? http://whitenoisemp3s.com/previews/Nothing_but_Crickets_preview_whitenoisemp3s-com.mp3

That's one plan, and it may or may not be better than having him upfront with Crouch. But both alternatives are infinitely better than having Heskey in the team.

That certainly is the £140m question.

1) It is unsecured debt, even though it gets paid back 100%. A disgrace that football creditors can vote, but those are the rules. 2) Why indeed? I think you've answered your own question there.

But in between NP and GB we had Dudd and Gormless, who left NP with sinking ship to save.

What about Crouch?

ooops.

Just swapping Heskey and SWP with Crouch and Cole would be a huge improvement. Simples.

Apart from Heskey, you mean?

This.

And I bet the Germans have been practising penalties with them, day in day out.

You're lucky. Here in the States we have Martin Tyler (on ESPN), the most boring commentator ever.

Amazingly Nigeria still has a decent chance of progressing: if they beat Korea, and Greece lose to Argentina, they're through. Not often a team losing the first 2 matches has such a good chance.

I'm amazed too. But don't forget, a huge part of the unsecured debt is either to football creditors (who'll get back 100% anyway), and Gayboy who'll get back (even at 20p in the pound) a lot more than he is really owed (allegedly). And God knows what other backroom deals have been made by AA.

Yes, but we're worried he'll buy another bunch of mercenaries to get them promoted at the first attempt. True, he'll be after the PL Sky money, but as a by-product the CHEATING BASTARDS could re-establish themselves in the PL.

There is no justice in this world. Didn't your mama tell you that? CHEATING BASTARDS

Actually, they often do.

Quick quiz: if you had to choose one of these, who would it be (and "no-one" is not a valid answer): Burley Branfoot Poortvliet Wigley Gray Saggy Chops I would have to go for Burley (reluctantly). God, we've had some crap managers, (and that list doesn't include Dudd & Gormless, Wotte, Merrington and Sourpuss).

Burley may have been a good manager, if he wasn't a drunken sod (allegedly). At the end of the day, he was crap, but he was not in the same league as Saggy Chops was for us (in crapness).

We'll walk this league.

Good question. For a normal club it would appear so. But we know the CHEATING BASTARDS somehow break all the rules.

Even if the image rights tax is contestable, the HMRC fines component would be harder to contest. Also, if AA says HMRC only are owed 24m, and that represents only 18.7% of the unsecured debt, a little maths implies that AA is claiming the total unsecured debt is now 128m. So HMRC themselves will contest that outrageous figure. In summary: HMRC will probably fight to reduce the 128m total unsecured debt figure, and at the same time increase their claim to higher than 24m. A little tweak at both ends will get them to 25%.