Dark Munster

Given the recent developments, this could be P*****'s last ever match. Maybe I should rethink not attending. I could say "I was there when the Cheats FC kicked their last ball!"

The meant the current Heskey (even worse than the younger version).

I can only hazard a guess that they sold him for peanuts, and given they still need to offload other players, AA doesn't want other clubs to know just how desperate they are.

And that is the stick that Comical Andy is beating the unsecured creditors' heads with. But it is surely a bluff, because it means Chainrai would forgo whatever part of the £48m parachute money he can get his grubby hands on.

Bugger, I just bought a ticket to watch some world-class soccer stars. Not.

Shame really, because it's nice to have some comic entertainment before HMRC's main event on Thursday.

True, if it were held in Europe. But with Messi in his prime, and assuming they have a semi-decent manager (unlike the clown Maradonna), I reckon Argentina (and obviously Brazil) will be the teams to beat when it's held in Brazil.

Hi Tim, different opinion from me. I thought Martin Tyler (as always) was a tedious bore. Blathering on with boring facts while the game is going on (too lazy to keep up with the game), and from his tone of voice barely looking up from his prepared notes of boring facts when a goal went in, often just muttering that the ball is in the back of the net in a dull matter-of-fact voice. He certainly did his job to turn off Americans from "soccer." On the other hand Ian Darke (along with Derek Rae and Adrian Healey) were excellent IMHO.

The only person in the world who would pick Heskey for an international team is Crapello. Ok, maybe Heskey's mum would too.

Schweinsteiger by a mile, eh? ... which is why Forlan was named the winner of the Golden Ball as the best player of the World Cup. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/world_cup_2010/8804708.stm Who's the thicko now?

2-1 to Holland it is then.

Or if they're Switzerland.

I doubt Holland will, either.

Nice one. Not a lot of people knew that.

They may have got that date from Comical Andy. It's his cunning plan to fool HMRC into filing the appeal one day too late.

That doesn't sound like your typical deluded blue few. Are you sure they're not Saints fans in disguise?

Rumour has it that Comical Andy may be influenced somewhat by Chainrai.

TBH I really couldn't give a toss if our saviour is altruist or not.

That's the driver.

That's possible. So if he picks the wrong loser in every match except the final ... it means the Dutch will still win.

But Paul gets everything right except the final (the Euro 2008 final was his one mistake). So that means the Dutch will win.

.... 1-0 they will have scored the fewest number goals by a World Cup champion. .... they will be the first World Cup champions to lose their opening match. Along with - First World Cup Champions from Europe to win playing outside the European continent. - Champions of the first World Cup in which the hosts didn't make the second round. - Be part of the first final without any of Brazil, Italy, Germany or Argentina. Any other firsts missed? (First WC in Africa is a bit too obvious).

Have a look at this comment from last year: :lol: blueballoo, Gosport says... 2:51am Fri 26 Jun 09 I am a Pompey fan but rather than indulge in pointless bickering I'll ask you a few questions: 1. Do you honestly think you could appeal that SLH is distinct from SFC when SFC was only able to pay last months wages owing to exclusivity funds from SLH? 2. Do you think a High Court Judge is going to agree that SFC is a solvent going concern when it has again failed to pay its staffs wages? The rule was created to stop solvent clubs being taken down by insolvent parent companies. Is SFC solvent? No. The bloke banging on about Delia Smith yesterday was hilarious - Delia Smith is a chef who publishes cookbooks. Does SLH publish a cookbook? No. Does SLH have any other business tthan SFC? No. Do the league have the right to interpret this rule according to the spirit? Yes. Would the High Court accept the right of an insolvent football club to escape a deduction because of 'natural justice'? No, because natural justice is on the side of the league - you ARE bankrupt. Secondly, you have to go the court wth clean hands to claim natural justice, you are trying to use a legal manouevre to avoid getting a penalty that APPLIES to you.