Leicestersaint

We/re starting to look a weak side in bowling and batting.

But now 190 odd for 5 and again lack of imagination in the bowling. How many dropped catches I wonder?

287 for 9 - very poor batting again.

254 for 6 - here we go!

199 for 3 with Adams on 102 no - now we want him to make a big ton (or more).

119 for 1 in reply - we need another 300 now!

Am I the only one that thinks Pothas is rather unimaginative in his use of bowlers -why not try Adams or a bit more of Carberry? They are now builidng a reasonable score at 264 for 7. Try something different!

Notts are 131 for 5 - better than 122 for 3. Where is Dawson? Carberry had better get some runs.

If you lot have your way we will end up with a squad of 50 with an average age of 36!

An awful performance.

52 for 4 and going down with all hands

Durham 311 all out. Hants 1 for 1 in second innings - Carberry out for a second duck! What's gone wrong here then?

208 for 5 - a bit better and at least we will get a few bowling points hopefully. No sign of the rain in Durham yet.

They are now 140 for 3 - I don't like the way this match is going! Why hasn't he given Dawson a bowl?

I still hope we can do really well in the championship this year - but we need more consistent batting and bowling.

We were all out for 105 - what on earth went wrong here?

Where was Dimi - his omission was bonkers. Shah, Key, Morgan, Collingwood ... is this the best we've got??No acceleration, no realfire power. Very poor captaincy - eg use of bowlers. Awful.

MLt is a phenomenon!

Football is generally run by dim-wits and clowns.

Another great result for hampshire.

Both these players would probably do very well in the third division and i woudl like to keep them. It is essential that we bounce back this comign season - like Leicester did.

Forget about Hoddle.

Well done hampshire - good result against Udal! We could go throguh to the next round with another couple of wins.

Matt is a true Saint through and through. (And would have been a great cricketer for hampshire!).

£400,000 does not seem enough to me. I think we have been mugged.