This.
Most climate-change scientists appear to be more or less unanimous, and nobody on here should claim to be better informed than people who have spent their working lives studying the issue. I wouldnt know, but I also wouldnt expect anyone to tell me how to do my (fairly specialised) job, and I know that I'm far better equipped to pass judgement on any issue relating to it than Joe Public as I've been involved in the field all my adult life. And I wouldnt tell my mechanic how to fix my car.
More to the point, what always seems to get missed in these arguments is the simple fact that the climate-change deniers' insistence that climate-change scientists provide absolute proof that it IS happening and caused by mankind. They dont need to. There only needs to be a tiny chance of that being the case, imo less than 1 percent, for that to be enough to trigger a response. We arent gambling with something we can get back, if we f*ck up the climate then its game over for us. I've got no direct personal interest in this, I'm pretty sure the planet will outlive me and I have no children, but it should be addressed for the sake of future generations.