John B

383 for 7 What a joke

The problem is that Pardew has not been good when teams start losing from what I have read on Charlton sites. I think it is the same with most managers Redknapp Pearson JP Wotte Lawrie Mac could not get Saints to perform well after a series of defeats so it is important that we start well

Well I hope so otherwise we will be in trouble

But we have lost Saejis Saga and Rasiak

And Saints got promoted

I agree surely if he has bought the club he wants to see it suceed and will spend sometimes. The creditors have been paid so what is the problem

As we dont do very well I always hope England will do well instead but that does not happen very often But equal probably However 1966 was wonderful

I agree but as a very sensible and knowledgable poster I still dont understand why you get involved as I have said before.

Because some players are in contract I would have thought

Sorry but I disagree you as sometimes quite agressive in your postings Perhaps confrontationally is not the right word. But I totally agree with the sentiments of your post to reserve the right to disagree with posters who attempt to rewrite history or to present conjecture as fact. Which is my point totally that is why I sometimes get involved because nobody can be totally wrong or even totally right. The past is the past and people have different slants on it there are so many ifs and buts. I still think that the way we were set up and because we had no significant backer and star players we were bound to be relegated from the Premiership

But surely we have money to by a some decent players and we do not have to just have frees.

I think they are all similar looking for confrontation.

I agree It is like players trying to get others sent off not good.

If he gets Murty then Two strikers at least one CB and Midfielder

Lets face the only way we were going to prosper was with a rich backer. We have that now and a free stadium. So things will improve its a shame that Pinnacle bid because we have missed a month of team building

Yes that is a problem due to the Pinnacle **** up

Yes plus another striker or two I would have thought

I cant really see the current team getting there this season but there seems to be a good chance next season

Yes I agree with you plus Brett But he did get the best out of Beattie who seemed to lose interest after he left and has never been the same since

Could not agree more but getting a replacement for Svennson was going to be very difficult . I just think the defence was getting near is sell by date and the team peaked in 2003

Is this overspending or overspending wisely http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/saints/news/4505089.Euell_ends_costly_spell_at_Saints/ The first I would have thought The Euell signing for me was start of the move to Administration but I am not really concerned noe regarding oadministration as it is now in the past

So nothing to do with the players then It does seem a bit strange

But they had a decent team we dont

Mind you can say that about loads of players I would have thought