Jump to content

John B

Members
  • Posts

    10,049
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by John B

  1. All talk mate these things take time. Nothing is ever simple
  2. I think you are probably wrong the RFU would have been working on this for sometime and would not have announced it without some firm commitment from SFC. However I dont think the RFU are definitely going to get the world cup
  3. It starts now and finishes in twenty four hours
  4. Lowe probably agree to it sometime ago I would have thought it is unlikely to have happened recently
  5. I agree with you but that is not the point the point Nick made was that Fry was doing nothing when clearly he is
  6. Yes you are a very respected poster
  7. Sorry Nick's view appears to be wrong as Fry is busy working on a plan to sell SFC
  8. I think lots of people knew about the match but could not be bothered to go.
  9. Well my birthday is in April I hope we dont have to wait until then
  10. Yes I totally agree
  11. Nothing interesting apart from the original post Which should say Radio Solent understands so no confirmation Some paranoia that a company will buy St Marys knock down it and turn it into a brothel super market or something plus http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/saints/news/4364179.Talks_held_up_again_in_twist_in_takeover/
  12. Somebody told me £20 m
  13. We just need anybody at the moment I would have thought By the way how much did Mandaric make out of Pompey
  14. Yes I expect that is being worked on now and a deal has not been copncluded
  15. There is no mention of how much money the bidder has to develop the club after paying £8m or £9m that is of no interest to Fry.
  16. I can just see the Council allowing St Mary's to be knocked down
  17. That is the key question which no doubt the bidder has been wrestling with but paying the mortgage on the Stadium was a major reason why we are in administration
  18. If a company bought St Mary's and charged say £30K per game for up to 10000 spectators and more for over 10000 spectators surely that would be a reasonable approach
  19. The land cannot be used for housing I believe
  20. That is why leasing based on attendance is probably the best approach
  21. Yes so many questions which will probably not be answered today but some will post with a wide ranges of answers which may or may not be correct. However I am now confident SFC will be playing next season in League 1 DESPITE http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/4364179.Talks_held_up_again_in_twist_in_takeover/
  22. I would rather SFC leased the Stadium and invested in players. Than owning the stadium and not investing in players.
  23. No not me
  24. There are other shareholders beside Lowe and Wilde who will lose money
×
×
  • Create New...