Window Cleaner

Chaos

Burley strikes again, in fact how many clubs that have gone into administration has he actually been involved with. Anyway stop citing derby, the points deduction was not enforced until the season after.

don't you mean alquiet?

Must be on Sky .

They can't, they're Saints junkies. They may want to stay at home or play golf but they can't. We have summer camps on this very forum for Saints junkies, you'd be surprised the number of people who log on at all hours of the day and night to talk about Saints not because they want to, they know they could get a life if they could just break with the past and move on...but they can't.

13 yrs old are not normally allowed into pubs unless they have specific family rooms. Or so I remember. WSS runs a pub I think, he'd know.

Derby weren't let off, the 10 point deduction was not yet in force. Also their debts were paid speedily and they moved on . I would think it depends really who is going to buy the club and for how much. If there is a serious buyer with significant cash within a short period the FL may not impose the penalty as a sort of "welcome" gesture.However if it's just a tinpot consortium with all the old lags involved scraping the barrel to get their hands on the train set again I think we'll get shafted, maybe even 10 extra for good measure.

It is indeed on the full priced hom shirts, or as far as I can make out it is. A "L" is £40, so even though you get a free ticket with it it's by no means a giveaway. Plus the tickets are "subject to availability" whether they'd reopen the corners to meet demand for free tickets is debateable.

Steve Morgan giving us a helping hand? thanks Steve.

Would I be right in thinking we lost every one of our games which immediately followed an IB this season.Seems we don't handle them well as QPR away apart they were all games we would have expected to win.

Well you know what they say, No news is bad news. The fact that McMenemy is reported to have seen Mr Fry twice is worrying, unless of course it's Souness that he's involved with and not...Crouch et al. I just have the nasty feeling that Crouch will try to get his hands on the train set again, whether he has the money to do it or not, it seems to be something of an obsession with him...not that Rupert's any better either.I just feel that all the usual suspects are coming up with their usual "aneries" and valuable time is being lost getting on with serious channels.

I don't think we actually own all of Staplewood, we own a part of it and the rest is leased to us.

I am actually quite amazed that in the space of 1 week,approximately 33% of the time Mr Fry said we had available, we have ,or seem to have, achieved ...Nothing. If anything the situation seems to have become more confused.

Now I know what ITK means Insolvent Tyre Kicker, always wondered before.

Yep, but you'll probably get beheaded if you get caught....Oh no right that's Saudi.

Right, another curved ball that's difficult to understand in the general context of the affair. Are SFC Ltd paying their own bills as you would expect of an independent company not in administration or is the administrator paying them? Surely the whole crux of the "no points deduction" would be defeated if the administrator was acting for SFC Ltd.

Who's paying Michael Fiddy?? (DLA Piper) is it SFC Ltd, the Administrators, or some other party. Probably doesn't come cheaply either.

I don't think it's a case of staying away even, it's a case of not going to football any more.If the tickets were £15 and £5 we'd probably get more that full price and £1. There's the shirt offer of course but a shirt is no doubt about £40 so unless you really wanted one anyway it's not a big break.

See he's already got the right coloured tie!!

The last photo in the article looks odd, as if their heads had been paintshopped on to the suits.

Because some legal eagle told him that we could circumnavigate the 10 point deduction anyway. Why they couldn't just sell the FC to someone for a nominal fee the day before the PLC went into administration beats me.

Yes;next question?

Well of course, however the stance being taken seems to be that FL rules are in no way applicable, which we know won't be the case.

But the FC aren't in administration thus don't have to comply with league rules to come out of it cos they aren't in it. Football league rules have, allegedly, nothing to do with the PLC's administration. The admins will try to sell the club to someone,in theory that should be the end of it. The new owners would then carry on as if nothing had happened. All this is so hypothetical it's untrue.

Ottery writes like David Mitchell, sometimes you think that there's a page or two missing, then you cotton on that that's the way of the yarn.