Window Cleaner

What benefit does that bring to the club. Bates was an icon but if the original statue hadn't been f*cked up Crouch wouldn't have had to put his hand into his pocket more than anyone else. I remember Ted, deserves his statue but paying for it didn't benefit the club in our time.

what money??? He bought some very overpriced shares, as far as I know it stop right there.

If there's one thing we don't need it's Leon Crouch. An influencable fool,always prepared to go with the tide and be Mr Popular.

Of note is the fact that in 3 of our TV games this season we've conceded very early on , in the 1st minute against QPR and Wolves and after 7 minutes against Palace. Can't be a coincidence really.

Some Jersey chap being Tom Scott who has donated over £1000 to our fighting fund of late. In fact I wouldn't be surprised if Mr Scott ends up as owner of SFC in association with Mr Richards and Mr Withers.

Who aren't scoring elsewhere either. Rasiak 5 goals from 18 league games, Stern John 2 goals from 24. Stop harping on about those 2,they are crap and no better than Saga,BWP or McG.All we've done is saved about a million quid by loaning them out.

I've got one in my car, absolute crap, sent me down a forest alley the other day.

they make Power Rangers and Action Men don't they? UK headquarters somewhere down by Botley Grange.

Well I don't know about you but I remember the nauseating bullsh*t that LLS used to spout incessantly on TSF.Imagine you're a well educated business guy who's been there and done that and you have to listen to an idiot like him spouting off in the directors box for 105 minutes. Id probably walk out after about 10 minutes.

no whatever they say it isn't right. We wanted 500K, they weren't in any hurry to pay it. They had the rest of the season anyway and knew damn well we'd be in financial sh*t street a couple of months down the line.Probably offered 250K down with some performance related stuff tacked on.I'm sure we'd have taken 500K straight up.

too expensive

Why would Ferguson want to leave Peterborough in the CCC and come to Saints in League 1?? No logic in that is there. We will get another manager who asks less than 200K a year, because we just ain't going to get a moneybags owner.

What has eluded him is that dyer has been on loan most of this season and no-one has come forward to buy him. Kids like him are two a penny in English Football nowadays. Erratic and troublesome. £1 million is a lot of money, easy to say and write, hard to find, don't forget the club is right up sh*t creek because we couldn't find about 100K last month.

Especially as we paid 275K for him in the first place, still we got BWP instead, thanks again George.

No football wasn't always like that, it used to be about cohesion and fight and turning up trumps for your fans whether you got 20£ a week or 200£. I'm old enough to remember when we were a top top top side, yet we had home grown players who were certainly on far far less than stars at Liverpool,Man U and Everton. It's only since Sky TV that that attitude crept in, big clubs buy all the best players and keep them in the reserves so that no-one else gets them. When a fading star comes on to the market lesser light fight over him and usually get shafted. Looks at Wolves side yesterday, I would wager that their collective wage was less than ours,yet we were shafted right and proper from the 1st minute onwards. We have wasters in our side,they should be giving the example, they aren't.

Peterborough are second in league 1, not far behind Leicester, how much do you think they pay?? It's not about what players earn, it's about what they bring to the game not take away from it. We pay some of the highest paid players in the CCC even now, yet we're 23rd and lost at home to the worst side last week, who are also no doubt paying top dollar..

£195K/52=£3750 per week, virtually 25% of what we pay that waster Euell. Allowing for say 10% increase since 2006 we still have a lot of players earning vastly over the odds who just don't earn their keep.

I've been to Huddersfield's ground, a dump by any other name. Used to be a really big club as well.Oldham were in the prem not so long back as well, Joe Royle was manager wasn't he?.

Well perhaps 500K till the end of the season.But after that we would normally use ST sales to pay the salaries until August, ie 3 months. But if we haven't got a club we can't sell tickets so where are we going to get the summer fodder from?. The matter needs to be resolved within the next 10 days or so because I for one don't believe that donations and saveoursaintsing will lead to anywhere near the money to carry on until we get some revenue in August. Our salary bill must be 500K a month, without counting non-playing staff or anything like that. So to get to August we need funds for May/June/July at least 1.5 million minimum, without travelling anywhere or paying for anything other than the contracted players salaries. The time wasters need to clear the decks and let the admins get on with finding real funds.

Nah we'll walk that league. All I hope is that we start out in League 1 with no players earning more than 5K/week

No, gates dropped remember. Plus we didn't shift Skacel or Rasiak or Saganowski for money. Rupert probably banked on that, he's always been so "successful" in selling players to North London yobbos and all that.Selling Deano went to his head, he thought you could sell any old pile of crap to anyone provided you made it look as if you didn't want to. Why he even got 6 million for Beattie.

Barclay's have probably not extended the facility in any way shape or form, that would be throwing good money after bad. Why would they do that, they pulled the plug, they're not suddenly going to start the funds flowing again. The administrator said the club have funds till the end of the season, ie 3rd May but after that there's zilch. The donations are probably paying the bills, doubt if Barclay's will.If there is no buyer the club will fold, the administrator said so.

100K maximum, Swansea won't give any more. They knew in January we were desperate for money, probably offered 200K (despite protests that they offered 500K,if they had we'd have taken it,we now know that) He'll probably be back here with his n-years contract,same as Rasiak and Saganowski to continue to drag us down forever.We'll probably have to sell McGoldrick,Surman and perhaps even James to pay for the old lags.

All appointed neophyte managers when perhaps an experienced hand was a better choice. We have our excuse-we have less than no money,as for Gunn at Norwich I just don't know what Delia was thinking.Perhaps he bakes a tasty pie or something.

Everest without oxygen and with no boots. Why keep on, it was over when we went into admin and lost at home to Charlton in a "glorious" 3 day spell.