Window Cleaner

1 in 500 then, so a whole season without scoring from a corner is about par, think we had 6 yesterday so we'd need 83 games or so to have a statistical chance of scoring from one.

Good question really, you'd have to think that the same rules apply to them all if there absolutely has to be this sort of reaction to a rule in the first place.

I'd think we can totally rule out signing another expensive keeper next summer.

There might be 10,000 strikers available but if you don't have the wherewithal then you can't buy any of them. We didn't have the money so we didn't get anyone. We got a couple of loans AMs because they weren't playing and their respective clubs were probably happy enough to get their 20000 nagwees/wk or whatever off the pay-roll for a few months. We have spent all of our money apparently so no expensive, shiny new striker in January. Paying Chelsea for Bertrand was probably the last of the loot from last summer, could it have waited a while so as to have the swans for a striker ? Who knows, certainly not me.

Why would you need a LB in a 3-5-2 system ? José,Maya,Gardos with Clyne and Derjky whatsit wide, Morgan,Vic and Davis more central and Pellè and Mané in attack. That was the way to go for me cos well I don't give a toss about being late for lunch, players used to have the option, lunch or non-lunch.

Ronald still thinks we can qualify for the Champion's League anyway.

Djurcic is a featherweight at a reported 67 kg, puff of wind would send him ass over tit let alone a sturdy shove from Can, it was a penalty, then again so was José's challenge on Sterling.

Why start with either of them really, why not start with the tried and tested DM duo and Davis. didn't understand yesterday's team selection at all, we seem to be obsessed with giving games to academy players in despite of better solutions being available. There was no need to start any of them really, we have better players and they should start. 3-5-2 was the way to go yesterday, no academy players needed.

Absolutely, it's not the service, it's up to him to get on to the end of what's on offer. Vastly overated player.

Difficult to see it now, 1 point from 3 home games is quasi eliminatory.

Which is why, no matter what, we needed not to lose yesterday. We put out the wrong team and now we'll not hear the end of it this side of Easter.

Perhaps they were late for lunch eh!!

I really don't know where that idea comes from either.

Wasn't difficult though was it, at least Rogers doesn't have a Dutch fixation, more a Southampton fixation.

Victor,Morgan,Davis, why we didn't start with that beats me, unless of course Morgan was late as well or isn't 100% but then he said he was. Koeman makes some strange decisions sometimes.

Probably lost track of time whilst fixing up a big money move for next season then.

Must have been Lambert then, think Roger is his Gran or something.

Never mind the paranoia, the ref was crap as was his assistant.

Much changed side though isn't it ? Only 5 players that started that game started today. Forster,Clyne,Fonte,Pelle,Davis. We've gone total Dutch since then.

At least Long is mobile, Pelle just doesn't get on to the end of anything. 2 goals in 18 games tells you all you need to know really.

Of course we will.

Well I hope whoever decided that is pleased with him(her)self then.

Would have gone with 3 at the back myself, for me Targett isn't ready for this sort of game. Nothing going forward, dubious defensively. With a back 3 we could have started Victor,Morgan and Steve Davis without losing ant forward options. Pelle is shot, just a jumbo waste of space, especially with players like Skrtel on the opposing side.

But then he would say that wouldn't he (Mandy Rice Davies circa 1965).