Window Cleaner

He did talk to the club, today, was denied a move, this is his reaction. Written transfer request tomorrow no doubt, after that we'll see.

Hmmm told you that at the last reasonably credible account I had that he had no intention whatsoever of staying. Needed to get out before the sh*t hit the fan over Chambers.

Tail end Charlie I expect, we'll see how it pans out from here until nine one as Ralph would say.

so in theory they could be sold on the 1st September and he'd be off the hook. Anyway there is going to be a massive problem because Morgan wants to leave.

depends who said it,

Ridiculous, although PSG are high on the list of respectable suitors for Rojo. Digne will find plenty of takers elsewhere. Not really sure that I'd want him though, might be a bit green for the PL.

and do you really think the Queen is interested in the Cup final or the Remembrance Day parade.

No chance of us getting at least 1 signing with proven PL experience then. They could at least make a little effort and get us Bertrand or something.

Normal really, he's just back after 12 weeks or so absence, Koeman wants to talk to him but I think his mind is made up, it was, don't see that it will have changed at all.

probably less than they've gained in shirt sponsorship for a single season. Our shirt sponsorship would probably buy a Bechuanaland youth international, theirs 4 top flight players.

have you actually seen TK play, he isn't that good. I doubt that Koeman would even want him, probably better for less in Holland. Don't know if TK played in the 5-1 humilition of Nice by Norwich yesterday but they are in desperate trouble, just about avoided relegation last season as well.

33 million was converted to equity when the Liebherr estate was still in probate, perhaps that was a sum that ML had earmarked for us. AS far as I know and I'm sure that those that follow the club account will confirm this all the rest (maybe about 60 million even if as Egg said she ploughed in another 28 million in April last) are loans and she obviously wants the money back. Other than that look at the thread I posted up, the wise men explain it there. Clapham Saint is a real illuminati on these things, whatever he says is 1000% gospel.

Of course she's loaned money to the company. 33 million was converted to equity about 3 years back, all the rest of the advances made by KL to St Marys Football Group or whatever is are loans, they can be taken back at will, she could even make the company borrow money from a bank or other lender and get her personal treasury reimboursed.

He'll deny everything and then tomorrow or the day after or the day after that some new fact will come to light which tends to suggest that he might have been economical with the truth yet again.

as far as I know, which is probably not enough, you can always take back sums that you've loaned to your company in the short term. You can even arrange it so that equity can be removed. Why did the company put out a solvency statemlent last year? Was it not explained to us at that time that it might even be a reduction in equity?. http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?46032-Cashing-In-Reduction-In-Share-Captial#.U9eb0Pl_ukw post 4.....still about are you ben ? and 22..now Clapham..there was a guy who knew his stuff.

No but even that amount is now in theory available through a manoeuvre in last years accounts.

........

they are bit part players from the Dutch league, De Vrij is a major international player who has just reached the semis of the WC. There is also a dearth of top class defenders, wiry wingers and non-international brick khazi CFs are more common.

Forster perhaps but we will not get Rojo, he has possibilities everywhere and Sporting want a lot of money for him.

Don't think we're interested in their cast offs actually. Do not forget that Mr Academy is running the football side of the club now. He probably believes in the hype about England being entirely populated by Saints players in 5 years time or that we're the next Barcelona..

Involved with what, selling successful players to the highest bidder. Don't think they've any power over that. If we can't field a team on opening Sunday they may give us a call to ask why, until then!!!!!!!.

Decent buyer, bolloakks I want one with shedloads of moolah that he throws around like pocket change whilst awarding us a 50 year 100 million per annum publicity contract with some iffy company over which he presides. If you're going to have an owner make it one with money, money that he doesn't mind spending. One that you can look up in forbes and it clearly states how much he or she has.

Well yes, it's called asset stripping.

Basically the club had too much liability, if we asked for say 200 million we probably wouldn't get it even with our old side. But if you sell some of the players for 100+ million and then the club for say 90/100 with no debt and some fine fixtures and fittings you might find a buyer. In our case I think you'll find the sum of the parts is worth more than the total. But you need to do that now because in a month or 2 the players might be worth far less.

Makes sense, probably didn't fancy 38 week-ends playing with kindergarten kids. We have no status in the game, we might have had for about 3 months but it has now left the building so players of a certain standing are reluctant to get on the bus.