rallyboy

Putting aside starvation, by committing the multiple war crimes of killing medical staff, attacking ambulances, targeting consultants in their own homes and dismantling the health service, for many countries Israel has ticked enough boxes to qualify their self defence operation as genocide. But the worst thing is that none of the above assists the release or rescue of the hostages.

I'm sure he did, it was Saints and Pompey who delivered a pile of crap - that's why we owe ITV an apology.

Sorry ITV, that was dreadful, we promised a thriller and delivered Midsomer Murders. That might have been their best chance, and they didn't take it. So....15 years, still unbeaten.

Really? I'm staggered, thanks for letting me know.

You were clearly a huge fan of his views on race, guns, religion, abortion etc - you may have to just accept that others disagree.

Indeed, nobody has found this murder acceptable. The usual suspects are trying to create something out of nothing.

Blimey, I hadn't considered that he might be involved, it would be a dramatic suicide if that's what you're asking, but it sounds ridiculously far-fetched. Putting that conspiracy theory aside, if Trump labels people as traitors, enemies of the state, and then something happens to them, or if he calls for a riot and it happens, do you believe he has a responsibility or is freedom of speech a get-out-of-jail card? Ditto Farage - when he labels communities as targets and then harm comes to them, does he have a responsibility for his words? And please don't just come back with another question, I have a very short attention span for quizzes. 😊

His record and some of his campaigns suggest that he also spoke an awful lot of crap. Sadly, if you do that from a podium enough times, a nutter is going to take the law into his own hands. Words should be used carefully in US politics - calling people traitors etc, can only lead to division, and worse.

Indeed, bombing Qatar should return the hostages and bring peace within days. A really great plan and a roaring success.

Warning - if you are attending and you punch any horses or fuck any immediate family members, you'll be directed to the away end. If you are worried, just bring written proof of having visited a dentist in the last decade.

Well, and this might come as a shock, I've heard whispers, on TV and in print, that there's a school of thought out there that believes that some groups may have been proscribed to suppress peaceful protest rather than because they tick all the boxes of a full blown terrorist organisation... Yes I know, it sounds crazy that a government might use a perfectly good rule for something sinister, but with three-tier Kier and his UK-hating, tax-dodging, flag-burning, EU-loving, woke commie union paymasters all hugging-immigrants, protecting rapists, destroying our perfectly good economy and being as loonie-lefty as they all are, it might just be possible...dangerous times...

I'm not sure they're trying to avoid arrest, I think you'll find they're highlighting possible misuse of the proscription system and demonstrating the need for free speech and the right to peaceful protest. But I'm only guessing.

Your computer clearly hasn't read my posts slagging off the government.

You've seriously never before clocked any right wing views among England fans? Over the years one or two have demonstrated leanings I believe.

Nah, she's just high on hate, tripping on ignorance and sequins.

Indeed it's not, the country needed positive change and while the task of turning around a crashed oil tanker takes time, Rayner has brought the bridge into disrepute. There are signs of improvement in some departments, but not enough. If things do not 'get better' in the next year, we all have a problem, because there is no viable positive option left to get adults with policies in the room, other than Lib Dems and Green, and I'm not sure they have the skills required to salvage the UK.

Most people have seen I'm happy debating with anyone sensible on here and I'm not one to resort to personal insults, I know a few posters personally and they're cool. But you stand alone. On a previous thread you mistook me for someone else, got elderly and confused and called me a paedophile supporter - a serious accusation that dropped you and the website right up to your armpits in shit. You then ran away and hid for a bit rather than making an apology. For that reason and so many others, I will not be taking any fucking lessons from you, so don't bother to quote me again.

People who loudly supported and defended corrupt cunts suddenly develop incredibly short and selective memories. We see you.

Where did I say her tax avoidance is okay? I called for her to be sacked. And no, they're not as slimy as the last lot yet - Labour still have a way to go before having a charge sheet as long as the last government. Anyone can see that.

Let's not pretend it's like Zahawi, who by 2017 had bought £25m of London property using money from tax havens, while his wife had an unsecured loan of £30m from unknown sources. A man who previously crashed a company with business partner Jeffrey Archer, owing millions, he was appointed chancellor by the PM even though he was under investigation by HMRC, having arranged his affairs through complex tax avoidance schemes. He lied about being under investigation, he then lied to the house, he even threatened legal action on several occasions saying there was NO outstanding amount, even though he was secretly negotiating a £5m settlement with HMRC. He then lied about the libel threats, and his advice encouraged the PM to lie at the despatch box in his defence. So NO comparison, Rayner hasn't even charged taxpayers for heating her stables. And those Boris fans on here, don't forget that your corrupt mate who did more damage to the UK than the fucking Luftwaffe, was sacked for shielding his sex offender mate - even Zahawi attacked Johnson's integrity for that. Lots of glass houses getting smashed up right now.

Rayner has to go. We had 14 years of ministers refusing to step down after committing some horrendous offences, and Johnson and his supporters protected sex offenders, tax dodgers and corrupt cabinet ministers. We need some integrity back in politics and if she's made that tax 'mistake', she should be gone. But Badenoch and Farage can say nothing, they have both protected colleagues who should not have been protected, some of whom should be in jail.

Interesting - assuming we haven't paid anything stupid for new players, which we won't have done, that looks like sensible financial management.

Wealth management company puts out press release promoting what they sell.

I think you have to look at people's track record and make a judgement. If Boris promised something I would be certain it wouldn't happen, ditto Farage - they both have appalling records of honesty and integrity. If Corbyn promised something I suspect it would happen, though it would probably be something pointless, if Starmer promised something I would be probably rate it as 50-50.

She's clearly landed her dream job as a keeper at The Amsterdam Zoo for Paranoid and Needy Animals.