Saint in Paradise

I thought it was going to be a team made from TSW "knobs" but I suppose there would be enough for several teams then?

I assume that she makes you very happy and hopefully you do the same for her? If so go for it and as for longivity who knows how long before WW3 will start with all this Iran business? Good Luck for both your futures.

Here it is on you tube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFrw3NnoSuM .

He wants to go abroad so how about South Africa then ? Sorry they don't have any rule 1 photos of the maids in the article. Maids who buff in the buff and plumbers who strip off more than just the grime in your pipes - these are the services on offer at a new South African company. Natural Cleaning Co, which bills itself as "the world's only all-naked service company," was founded a month ago by Jean-Paul Reid after he struggled to find work as an accountant in a country with a 23.9 per cent unemployment rate. The company offers housekeeping, accounting, legal, computing and other services, with a twist - staff show up either topless or fully nude, depending on the client's request. "Cleaning is the popular one, and then handyman services for the ladies," Reid, 29, told AFP. He said he currently gets about one client per day, typically white middle-aged men. http://news.msn.co.nz/worldnews/8425430/south-african-maids-buff-in-the-buff .

http://www.dump.com/2011/04/16/one-us-aircraft-carrier-has-a-more-powerful-air-force-than-70-of-all-countries-video/

Now Lampitt has gone what will happen to him IF TB finds out that Lampitt did something a director shouldn't do. Will Lampitt still be liable now that he is no longer a director??

I notice the BBC still haven't taken their points off yet. Do they have a contact within the FL who has told them something? Perhaps the FL are going to feel sorry for pimpey and not deduct any points after all?

I have to say that after reading the post from Guided Missile on the last page I think that they will get away with it yet again. Maybe only for another year but I want that lot to die before I do.

Ref the BBC iPlayer, as I am not in the UK it won't work for me. IF I found someway to fool it into thinking my computer is in the UK could I watch it legally then?

:facepalm: Dereck Chisora threatened to shoot David Haye after the two were involved in a brawl at the news conference following Chisora's WBC heavyweight title loss to Vitali Klitschko. Haye's manager, Adam Booth, also suffered cuts to his face in the melee. Chisora accused Haye of "glassing him", before saying at least four times that he would shoot the former WBA heavyweight champion. He then added: "If David don't fight me, I am going to physically burn him." Haye had been working for a television station and attended the news conference afterwards. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/boxing/17088021

Wonder how he trained himself to do this? http://www.wimp.com/excitingmath/ .

What about NZ? Get a NZ passport after 3 years then go over to Aus without visa etc

http://www.bbctvlicence.com/index.htm Good Luck to those who don't have one.

We have English friends who lived in Perth, moved back to the UK for a few years but are now back in Perth. They seem to love living there. Plenty of work in the mining industry it seems?

IF he does say that in an interview I wonder if it will be broadcast or cut out? The media still gives pimpey a softer ride than other clubs get, well IMHO anyway.

I wish Clapham could post more than he does. He always makes it easy for me to understand ( Not the easiest thing to do ) and also he calms down some on here who get over excited.

Well if they only have to worry about HMRC they should be ok as HMRC appear pretty weak when it comes to pimpey.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/02/16/charlie-brookers-the-sun-poem-10-oclock-live_n_1281069.html .

Well they have been under AAs influence for quite a while now, wonder if that has anything to do with it??

Anyone have any idea what time we will hear the result please? As I post this it is 22.17 NZ time 09.17 UK time, and I have to go out to collect my wife who is at work. I will be home by 23.30 and should go to bed but could stay up an hour.

Here you go 3 suggestions 1 A Pole shift meaning the North Pole will be somewhere in Brazil 2 Yellowstone volcano will errupt causing major major problems as bad as a nuclear winter 3 Planet X turns up

Must say that if any results have been found they have been kept very quiet.

Not on facebook thing myself but has that Penny posted anything about "them" lately?

There were fans that could have told the Football League what was wrong with Antonov long before they applied their ‘Test’. Fans with access to Google who could read what the FSA said about him. Well they sure as heck weren't pimpey fans they were Saints fans on here that outed them yet again. pimpey fans didn't believe those Saints fans. Stuff the lot of "them" hope they die Monday I still feel that somehow they will survive though :x:x

Oct 2011: Senior judge raises doubts over power of European court Lord chief justice Lord Judge says UK courts not bound by rulings of Strasbourg-based court of human rights Head of Legal: Lord Irvine: British judges should decide human rights cases for themselves Lord Irvine tonight weighed in to the debate about Britain’s relationship with the European Court of Human Rights – and effectively accused the Supreme Court of having surrendered its intellectual independence, and shirked its judicial responsibility. His at times toughly-worded lecture to the UCL Judicial Institute and the Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law chimes with what the Attorney General Dominic Grieve has been saying recently about the need for primary responsibility for human rights protection to lie with states, not Strasbourg – and Grieve will surely approve of both the content and timing of Lord Irvine’s intervention, on the eve of the European Court’s ruling in Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. UK and in the context of Britain’s chairmanship of the Council of Europe. I’ll link to the text of his speech when it’s available. Lord Irvine stressed his unswerving support for the ECHR and the Human Rights Act, but made clear his view that British judges have shown too much deference to the Strasbourg court – more than the Human Rights Act 1998 requires or entitles them to show. He said of section 2(1) of the Act that “its terms are simple”, (1) A court or tribunal determining a question which has arisen in connection with a Convention right must take into account any— (a) judgment, decision, declaration or advisory opinion of the European Court of Human Rights .. and that it was “surprising” it’s given rise to any difficulties. He asserted repeatedly that it was clear from its wording and from the Parliamentary record that Parliament intended domestic courts to “have regard to”, to “consider” or to “bear in mind” Strasbourg judgments. He said It is untenable to suggest that judges are entitled to treat themselves as bound by them. The courts have, however, he argued, strayed considerably from what Parliament intended............. http://www.headoflegal.com/2011/12/14/lord-irvine-british-judges-should-decide-human-rights-cases-for-themselves/ .