Jump to content

alpine_saint

Members
  • Posts

    23,595
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by alpine_saint

  1. Wow. Immaculate timing..
  2. Erm, havent MLT, Fialka and Fry done exactly that on separate occasions ?
  3. hehehe I love British humour. The Austrians are miserable sods.
  4. hehehehe
  5. Yawn.... (not at you, of course, just that we've heard all this before)
  6. Exactly, the FL have been playing the classic "It's my ball, I'm taking it away" game.
  7. What a truly ridiculous post. It seems your desperation to portray yourself as a hard man has got in the way of rationality. Heres one club who got hit MORE points than that : Luton A club is deducted 10 points for going into admin, then additional points for not haveing a CVA when they come out of admin. Thought you would know that before running your mouth off and stating your opinions as fact. As for the education, that one is truly hillarious. Firstly you dont know me, or how highly I am educated, but I'd put money on the fact that its higher than you. A lot higher. And secondly, you must tell me where you received this education in Joint Honours in Fly-On-The-Wall During Confidential Football Club Takeover Negotiations with Mind Reading / Crystal Ball Gazing..
  8. Why do they need to ask for the wavier if our window of opportunity to appeal, according to the rule book, is over ? Sorry, something doesnt add up.
  9. I agree with Steve for once.
  10. I dont agree. Pinnacle proved funds to the administrator, so proving it to the FL should have been a doddle. I simply dont believe the FL. They tried to go for -25 by playing hard-ball, and its blown up in their face. Some of you probably think that the FLs statement means that anyone else who wants to buy SFC can expect to lose no more than 10 points. B*ll&cks I say. Why ? Well, according to Malwhinney, we had a right-to-appeal, remember ??????
  11. In. Your. Opinion.
  12. Oh do have a word with yourself. Are you a Skate ?
  13. Indeed, has anyone bother answering this in a coherent fashion yet ?
  14. Cant you answer without being abusive - just for once ???
  15. What other reason is there for the possible reopening of the Fialka/Pinnacle bid ? What the FL said in private to Pinnacle being different than their public statements before ? Maybe sanity has prevailled at the FL at last, and a few suits have realised that driving clubs out of existence benefits nobody. Either that or there has been some SERIOUS communication issues between Pinnacle and the FL, and that seems unlikey considering how long the communication loop has taken sometimes.
  16. More like they will dot the "I"s then discover that they need to cross the "T"s and spend 2 weeks arguing with someone over it before pulling out.
  17. .....except the £1m is being used to pay a back-log of wages and probably other short-term debt. I also believe that the exodus of players can only cause a drop in the residual value of SLH and its assets
  18. The club are not permitted to sell them.
  19. Also my first match - 1977 I think, we drew with Hull City 2-2.
  20. LOL at CB Fry, the voice of "truth and reason" hanging off the every word of the Echo. Talk about crediibility being shot-to-pieces...
  21. This is more likely to be the winding-up order than a takeover.
  22. B*ll*cks. Infract yourself for being a WUM.
×
×
  • Create New...