I just looked at them too.
Clyne defended better than he attacked - very rarely got beaten, and his crossing was ordinary.
Kane's rating, and I quote: "6 - Quiet night for the Spurs striker but has proved before he can get goals for England." So, he was rated on historical performances and 'reputation', then, not this one?! Maybe we should do that all the time - ignore the actual performance and just rate them on what we think they're probably capable of!
I thought he was worth a 3 at most. He was dreadful.
Bertrand rated same as Clyne, but was way better imo. Attacking play was actually useful, linking with Sterling well. Should have got a 7.
The rest I kind of agree with.