KelvinsRightGlove

It's pretty obvious isn't it? He is an MEP, that has the amongst the worst attendance rates in the parliament. Does he not take his wages for when he doesn't show up? Why does he employ his wife, despite saying he nor his party would employ family members (you know, to differentiate them from other parties, which you've already proved they aren't any different from). And why has he gone back on his statement that he would submit to a full audit, or even rejected undergoing one similar to which Labour MEP's are subject to? Show me some other parties that have done it though, 'cause that will prove UKIPs USP, how different they are from the establishment/political class etc etc.

Is this Deppo? https://twitter.com/DeppoInExile

True, how foolish of me. I regularly embarrass myself in front of several people. It'll be just a standard day in the life of KRG.

I'm not saying he's the worst. But, there are far better players that won't be going. My point was, there are many, far better players that will never get to go to a World Cup, not through a lack of their own ability, but the fluke of where they were born. This should not affect how they are judged as a player, imo.

Also, yes, I'm always up for drunkenly embarrassing myself. Might as well do this in front of thousands of people in Hyde Park.

Forget the haters tokes. I still loves ya. See you in Hyde Park soon, yeah? ps. what is this Deppo?

Christ Lord D, are you actually Farage? Yes, other politicians are on the take. The point being, UKIP are meant to be different, or so they tell us. All this anti-establishment nonsense, or as posters earlier in this thread said, a point against the "pigs in the trough" politician. So with UKIP also on the take (Farage milking millions from the EU that he opposes so much), tell me how they are different from the others then?

Christ, Bentaleb at a World Cup?! I'm not saying the lad hasn't got potential (he's what, 19?), but that's ridiculous. Highlights how weak the "to be a great player you have to do it at a World Cup" argument is. Is he better than Giggs, who never got to play at an international tournament? Does that make Giggs any less of a player because he was Welsh? Absolute nonsense. Sorry for the tangent.

Regularly? Like Kolo Toure? (cost £14m) Adebayor? (£25m) Nasri? (£25m) Clichy (£7m) Gosh, imagine how much they could have got if it wasn't for all those free transfers?! I'm sorry, but that post is total crap. If Sagna goes to City, for a free it will be the first one to make that move for free. The others have generated around £70m.

Ignoring the several statements that no player MP want to keep being sold from RK, the several comments about the desire to keep MP and Reed's pretty bold recent statement? What more do you want to be said?

They really aren't. Every year it's the same thing, and you fail to grasp it. Just because you havent heard anything that means nothing happens. remember last year, your little meltdown at how poorly we were run, because you heard no incoming rumours about players? What happened? Oh yeah, Lovren signed a couple of days later, how did that work out. No one is saying there are rumours of managers or players staying. Things will be going on behind the scenes, what do you want? "The clubs is talking to MP, and the Liverpool/Utd and Lallana/Shaw?" What exactly does that tell us? There is interest in the players/manager? Well, yeah, we knew that. Until things have been resolved, there is no point releasing a statement. You aren't exactly scared of trotting out your oh so brilliant "all fart no sh*t" line, what exactly would a statement right now be?

No, no it doesn't. Same as everything else. Just because the club doesn't tell us every minute detail of every step they take, be that transfers, contracts, kits, sponsors, redevelopment (training ground etc), it does not mean they are not doing anything. If anything that would simply slow them down more. Get stuff done, tell me about it afters, if I need to know. Until then, they should shut up and get on with their jobs.

We've done this repeatedly over the last few months. RK several times and Reed recently too. Them making statements is not going to stop clubs being interested or making bids. I also suspect you are overestimating the fans influence. If the board decide to sell, they will sell. I doubt many fans want to see Luke or Adam or any of our key players leave, but there is little we can do and the board really aren't going to be swayed by our reactions, or supposed lack of reaction either way.

I can't remember anytime over the past 5 years we heard so much from the club? It's an uncertain time right now, with interest in our players. Whatever the club say, people still get het up. Just get a grip FFS.

If you meet, pap should go along and mediate. He is experienced in beef reconciliation meet ups. I know it's a bit of a trek for you, and you have a family and that, but show some effing commitment yeah?

This is on iPad now. Well worth playing, I bloody loved every minute of this game.

True story. I was at a Roulette table in Leeds Grosvenor Casino at 4.30am with Bradley S Club. He was a bell. #rocknroll

I guess that is kind of what I mean. I don't really support any party. I hate them all, if I'm honest. I do feel though, at the moment I would be totally dismayed if I was a Labour supporter. Ed Milliband and the leadership are just utterly useless.

Never understood the team idea of it. as an e.g. Gordon Brown on stepping down as leader of Labour said "I'm Labour til I die". I find this odd. I'm not for one moment suggesting this is unique to him or Labour. But, why on earth would you make a decision based on today (which in many cases isn't true, it'll be parents views, a book they read, etc) and stick to that forever. Circumstances change, as do the candidates. Surely, it makes much more sense to vote on certain people, at certain times, given certain circumstances? Or am I being silly?

Yh, thanks tokes. Boss walks past as "S Club Porn" message flashes on my screen. KRG had some 'splainin to do there.

This is why I like you. Fair points. That last sentence, is that not just politics, and people talking politics in general?

Pap, you know I like you. But, some of these double standards are just silly. Basically, because I dislike UKIP my opinions are invalid? You dislike the tories, does that mean you can have no opinion on them? I'm pretty sure you are happy to make remarks about them. Yes, I am upset about the way they talk about it. I have said that repeatedly, well done on picking up on that. I've never once said no other party does this, of course they do. Have you seen Labour's PPB? Or the Tories "don't give the keys back to the lot that crashed it" rhetoric. If UKIP don't like the hits, maybe, just maybe, their candidates should reel in the racist and misogynist chat. But no, it's obviously the media's fault they all keep saying this. I agree, an 18 year old probably isn't the best place to go for political insight, but at 18 she can vote so is equally allowed her say like everyone else. She's also no longer 18, and has a pretty good insight to the party that most others haven't had. Certainly more than me, and unless I'm mistaken you as well. I agree, it was naive to join in the first place, but she should at least be commended for realising the mistake she had made. Errm, so a decade ago, things were done, and have continued happening, so we should just give up now? People who highlight things a party have said, or actions they have taken should be forced to stop? I agree Labour's policies post 9/11-7/7 were disgusting. I said so at the time, but, as you say, who listens to teenagers? We'll have to disagree on flat tax. Progressive tax is not perfect, I find it fairer, but do think work needs to be done to ensure the system works better in practice, no argument on that. It still hardly demonstrates Nigel (and lets be honest, his rich mates) are there for the people, and looking after the working man as has been suggested. Well, it may not be in their manifesto, but their members voted against the "combating violence against women" in the EU act a few years ago. Yes, other parties dragged their feet on this for far too long, and it is shameful, but this far more recently. These are not people I want representing me. For these reasons. There's more to the EU than immigration, but this has been all the EU election has become. Yes, that winds me up, I'm not remotely ashamed of that. I want to talk about immigration, I despise the way UKIP do it. Frankly pap, you are as bad as what you are accusing me of.