badgerx16

He has ridden it out for more than 2 years, so in all probability he has just put it down as the usual paranoid ramblings from right wing conspiracy nutjobs, and decided he has bigger things to worry about. If it was so serious, given it's been around for do long, why is his daughter still turning up alongside him in public ?

So when somebody turns your style of rhetoric back on you you don't like it ? Diddums, snowflake.

Most of what is used to ridicule Trump comes from his own mouth. Funny as fuck right wing nutjobs swallowing wholesale conspiracy bollox and lacking the ability to critically analyse or form their own opinion.

Why has this recently resurfaced, when it originally 'broke' before the 2020 Presidential election ?

I suspect that this is as credible as the Hitler Diaries. I base this on nothing, other than the website that originally broke the "story", leaked by an "anonymous whistleblower", is well known for carrying extreme anti-vaxx articles, claims that 9/11 was an inside job, and that Hilary Clinton is a sex trafficker. The site is generally classified as 'Coniracy Pseudoscience'.

How long have you lived in the UK ?

Fracking would not produce anywhere near the amount of gas that used to be projected, and is environmentally disastrous. ( As well as simply kicking the can of weaning ourselves off fossil fuel down the road ).

Scott Parker's pre match tactical plan was to keep Salah quiet.

Russia have apparently withdrawn S300 SAM systems from Syria and are redeploying them to occupied Ukrainian territory to replace units destroyed there.

If I were you I'd be going out buying extra jumpers so that I can "layer up" through the winter.

Just to be clear, this is why it is worth having to 'tough it out'. If we don't, we are condoning this;

Your World view is all over the place, and your reading of people is wildly off the mark. 1) "Toughing it out over the winter" - yes I am prepared, if it is necessary, and financially we can cope. ( Though I would prefer not to have to ). If your answer is 'NO' then you are admitting that you are willing to sell Ukraine's independence down the river for your own personal, selfish, motives, and at the same time reward Putin's expansionist megalomanical plan to dominate Eastern Europe. 2) "Demanding everyone in the Tory party is sacked" - I am perfectly well aware that we are lumbered with the inept and clueless bunch currently in Government for the remainder of the Parliamentary term.

Don't revert to your pro-Putin trolling.

It's amazing how these visionary people can see the problems so much more clearly than you or I.

And the current Chancellor has issued this piece of astute advice ; "People should use less energy".

I know it has already been posted on here, but it bears repeating; Morons, generally in SUVs, for whom the phrase "merge in turn" is cast in some obscure off world language.

TAn alternative definition was introduced; "(1) They have required fuel costs that are above average (the national median level), and (2) were they to spend that amount they would be left with a residual income below the official poverty line.", but the Department that introduced that was shut down by the May Government, so now we have a definition that defines an aspect of poverty that has no basis on income levels.

That's a convenient obfuscation considering the parameters determining fuel poverty: "Fuel poverty is affected by three key factors: a household’s income, their fuel costs, and their energy consumption". Historically it was defined as having to spend 10% of the household income on fuel bills, but the Teresa May Government did away with that. https://www.turn2us.org.uk/Benefit-guides/Fuel-Poverty/What-is-fuel-poverty

You can't water them down, there's a drought.

You have just shot down my appreciation of your financial clout 😉

Whatever Everton get for Gordon is our asking price for Che. Nothing less.

Grobbelaar

The FSB couldn't solve the Daily Star crossword in 2 days, let alone a murder investigation.

So why don't we ?

Assasinations of this sort are extremely high risk. Why would Ukraine send an operative with the potential for ( her apparently ) to be thwarted and captured ? Their alleged activities in Crimea are far more effective and productive.