badgerx16

Carbon fork on a £300 bike is a bonus. Ultimately the price is irrelevant, if you are happy with it then it's the right bike.

Was that the Android's estimate ?

"Why agree to pay back over 1 year when you can commit to paying back over 4. Doesn't stop you paying back earlier if you want to ...." "Another factor is, if you agree to pay someone sooner than initially agreed, you give yourself an opportunity to do a deal to pay them a little less if they get a bigger lump sum sooner." How many times are they going to try to dilute what they owe their former heroes ?

The comments section under the echo article makes threads on here look extremely civilised.

Danny Fox is not, nor will he ever be, in my opinion, a player of Premier League standard. However, he IS a Southampton player, and if the manager decides to play him, we must respect that decision, ( in all probability the coaching staff are perfectly aware of DF's limitations ). The fault yesterday was that however we were set up, there wasn't effective cover in front of him and Swansea exploited that. As things stand DF is our second choice left back; booing or sarcastic cheers won't help.

Generally yes - that's the way it's put together, but then some people prefer to believe that the BBC is a hotbed of liberal conspiracy.

Not to mention Fonte, whose partnership with Lovren is the rock on which our current form is based.

When was our last clean sheet with Danny Fox playing the full match ?

Was that 'hoof' or a well directed long pass ?

I think it was given for Lovren wrestling with whoever was marking him.

Can anybody explain to me what, exactly, the above 13 posts have added to the debate ?

No it isn't, ( unless your comment is intended to be 'tongue in cheek' ). The 'rebuttal' is in support of a fabricated 'fact', which has been completely shot down.

2 articles from the Telegraph : It's obit on Ralph Milliband http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/politics-obituaries/10347055/Professor-Ralph-Miliband.html and an interview with 'Red Ed' http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ed-miliband/9544522/Ed-Miliband-interview-I-want-to-save-the-capitalism-my-father-hated.html

An annotated breakdown of the DM article; http://33revolutionsperminute.wordpress.com/2013/10/01/the-daily-mails-ralph-miliband-editorial-annotated-version/

He can't, because RM NEVER said he opposed the Falklands war, he merely resented the positive boost it gave to MT's popularity, helping her to win an election she would probably, otherwise, have lost : "I mean that her brand of Toryism may now come to predominate. The Falklands has served her well . . .".

Lord Moore : "The Daily Mail is telling lies about a good man who I knew"

Bolshevism may be a distorted reading of socialism, but socialism is most certainly NOT bolshevism. You might as well equate Al Quaeda with Islam.

Do you deliberately misread other peoples posts ? You know full well that the point I was making was that, in response to your jibe at socialism and religion, that slavery ( especially as praticed by the UK and the US - a purely capitalist enterprise driven by profit ), and colonialism ( driven by 'what yours is ours' asset stripping greed ) were equally effective at mass oppression.

Unnecessary, unfunny, and for some, offensive.

I think that colonialism and slavery, both strongly based on expansionist capitalist ideals, are up there as well.

Socialism isn't unsavoury, it just falls foul of the innate greed and avarice that all political systems engender in their leadership. And don't for a second fall in to the trap of assuming Stalin, Mao, or Mugabe had/have anything to do with Socialism - after all, what was the name of Hitler's party ?

If capitalism is such a success, why are children going hungry in the USA ? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-21636723 And why are there 'food banks' in this country ?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-24367601 Come on, own up. ( Edit, mods - can you change 'Winchester' to Cadnam' in the title, pretty please. )

I heard a quote on the radio this evening stating that this whole affair is actually a matter of 'freedom of the press'.... The editorial team at the Daily Mail are perfectly free to confirm their status as narrow-minded, bullying, bigots.

I suspect that the Mail will find some way to resurrect it.