Wes Tender

So add yourself to the growing list of supposedly intelligent people who can't comprehend a simple statement of opinion.

So to your simple mind, just predicting that a failure to deliver Brexit will result in serious civil unrest, equates to advertising an intent to commit serious criminal offences? Your mate also arrived at the same stupid conclusion when I told him that if he spouted the same insulting and patronising responses to somebody's opinions in a pub, he would risk a physical assault. He concluded also that I was threatening him with violence. For two people who like to give the impression that they are intelligent, such a failure in their reasoning flies in the face of that facade. I have to ask again, how old are you?

kelvin davis out!

Exactly.

You believe what you want. I've set the record straight for you two. By all means take me up on my lack of admiration towards Arabs in future if you like. It will look a little at odds with this puerile jihadi rubbish that you two spout.

Just to set you right on the background to the accusations you make about me. I'll do it one more time, because it seems that you are not very good at simple comprehension of our language. I posted an opinion on Brexit from somebody I had never heard of before, but whose views on Brexit coincided with mine at the time. He turns out to be an anti-semite. Does that mean that his views on any other subject are to be disregarded? Are you really that blinkered to believe that? There are strange bedfellows on both side of the Brexit divide, but do you discount the Brexit views of fellow Remoaners because their political views are diametrically opposed to yours? The Shylock thing - he distorted my post name by one letter, so I rather childishly did the same to his posting name. I have ceased the silliness, but he and you continue the infantile practice. I have already attempted to put you straight about whether I am a jew hater. I have stated that in fact I admire the Jews in many ways. I am however, not a great admirer of the Arabs. This persistent rubbish that you spout about me fantasising about re-arranging Shurlock's face - show me where I said that. You can't because I never said it. I said that if he spoke to anybody in a pub in his patronising, insulting manner, then he would probably invite a physical assault, but if you took that to mean that it would be threatening it, then you really must be a bit simple. But of course, am I really bothered about your opinions and abuse on a football internet forum? No, I'm old enough and wise enough to totally disregard it. If it is your way of getting your jollies, then fill your boots. loser. And so to return to the question that I have asked you several times and which you avoid answering, how old are you?

Following your previous and increasing propensity to throw around infantile insults, I recently asked you how old you were. I still haven't received a reply. I can hazard a guess as to your mental age, but it would be interesting to know your physical age. That way we can decide whether you are just immature through adolescence, or whether you are more in need of sympathy for your condition.

Hang on to it for 6 months,and you can sell it to his next club full price.

Oh, as an afterthought, I can't wait to watch MOTD tonight, when the pundits will criticise how badly Man United played, without any praised for how well we played.

Disappointing to lose from a position of a two goal lead, but very encouraging to hold on to the draw for such a long time, them having pegged us back. Taking the match as a whole, I don't think it fanciful to think that we edged it as the better team. However, I believe this to be the worst United team I can ever remember and there wasn't a better time to be playing them. When the match was even at half time, there was a possibility that both managers could have faced chants of "sacked in the morning" if the win went convincingly one way or the other. But our second half display gives Hughes some breathing space, and moves Mourinho closer to the exit door at United. After all, his team of expensive primadonnas was incapable of beating a relegation zone team. Hughes should be given credit at least for playing them the right way tactically and the players get credit for carrying out those instructions. That is to get in their face, close down the spaces, and show aggressively that you want it more than them. As Corporal Jones might have advised, they don't like it up them. Once again, Lemina was a tower of strength and probably the one player that could have improved Man United's midfield. He was certainly better than Pogba, but think what they could have done for United playing alongside each other. Lemina, Hojbjerg and Armstrong are proving to be a very good trio in midfield and Redmond is getting better and better with each match, growing in stature and the confidence to run at defenders with the ball at his feet. He is becoming a real handful and it is only his final touch that sometimes lets him down. The two full backs had a good game, Valerie not out of his depth despite his inexperience at this level and his young age. Cedric has filled in very well for Bertrand and his free kick goal was a real peach. I didn't know he had that in his locker. The central defence was generally OK, but it was inevitable that in pressing high to take the game to United, there was always the chance that their pacy star players could punish us on the break and so it proved. But United in the second half also had to come at us and I cannot remember a United team so guilty of misplaced passes and awful shots from distance. We completely dominated them the last 15 minutes. When Lukaku went down having fallen badly when no Saints player was near him, why did we stop playing? Would they have stopped playing if one of our players went down? I don't think so. But when is one of our strikers next going to score a goal? Once again, goals for a defender or a midfielder. Armstrong looks as if he might end up our top scorer. He isn't afraid to have a shot at goal and neither is Hojbjerg. An honourable mention to Obafemi,who acquitted himself well and can surely only get better with experience at this level. For a change, gaining a draw against a glory team like United when we were the better team, it almost felt like a win leaving St Mary's.

Did he say it was? No, I didn't think so.

No thanks. I'll pass on your kind offer of a bout of patronising and infantile ripostes from you, if you don't mind.

They want as many votes as are needed to return the result they want, i.e. to stay in the EU. Once that has been achieved, they will say that it was a democratic decision that cannot be overturned. When there was the original referendum in 1975, the losers didn't immediately call for a "peoples vote" a couple of years later, they buckled down and accepted it and it took over 40 years to get another say. Despite subsequent treaties totally changing the nature of what joining the Common Market meant, no referenda were allowed on any of those treaties. Now, even though we haven't even left yet, politicians and the establishment are clambouring for another referendum, claiming all sorts of spurious reasons for it. Frankly, those that seek another referendum so soon after the last one are beneath contempt. They aren't democrats, they are unprincipled hypocrites.

The phrasing of loss of access to the European market is misleading. Firstly, it is trading with the EU, not the European market. Secondly, anybody trading with the EU has access to the single market either under WTO terms or a FTA. Whereas Remoaners are happy to bandy about this figure of 44% of our exports, hoping that the less intelligent voters will think that a large percentage of it will be lost, I can't recall anybody forecasting what percentage of it might be at risk. Neither can I recall anybody predicting how much of the EU's trade surplus will be at risk if we left under WTO terms. I suspect that any loss to us will be really quite small and much of it replaced through other markets outside of Europe. But as Fox points out, forecasts for the economy in the various scenarios of how we leave or don't leave from the Treasury and the BoE are wildly, almost comically exaggerated.

Yes, it is my privilege you know. Not much point in wasting time on idle chit chat until after May's pathetic attempt at a deal is rejected by Parliament. In the meantime, I'll just watch the establishment hysteria vent itself in project fear on steroids as freedom day the 29th March gets closer and closer.

No. Take it that frankly I can't be arsed.

Economy, economy, economy. You just don't get it, do you? That emphasis lost Remain the referendum and yet they still go on about the economy, the economy, the economy, when the majority of Brexit voters placed their priorities elsewhere. The pound might have dropped, but the penny hasn't yet. You do know the story about Peter and the Wolf, don't you? People are fed up with unsubstantiated claptrap about the affects that a clean Brexit would have on us, and they have heard it explained so often as a cliff edge, a car crash, a disaster, that they have just stopped believing any of it.

Who ever he is, he lowers any respect that his credentials might earn him by the childish puerility of some of his responses. Ditto Shurlock and Moonraker.

The referendum was two and a half years ago and I'm not going to fight the campaign all over again. Most of the project fear predictions which would follow from a vote to leave the EU from before the referendum never materialised. In fact in many cases, quite the opposite, with rises in employment, growth in the economy, rises in house prices, etc. So excuse me if I show a great deal of cynicism about the same people making the same dire forecasts, including you.

By all means have your own mental picture of me if it makes you feel good, and I'll just console myself that your having to resort to hurling insults is indicative of somebody incapable of advancing an argument without resorting to infantile behaviour. You're in good company on here with your mates Verbal and Shurlock.

You really do believe everything that project fear tells you, don't you? How incredibly naive you must be. Nobody with any intelligence believes what the Treasury forecasts are any more and even Carney places caveats on his own dire forecasts. What a pity that it is only the Remoaners who have the brains and that all of the Brexiteers are thickos, eh? They must be, mustn't they, as they are prepared to bugger the economy and ruin the livelihoods of untold millions just to get out of the EU straight-jacket and regain control over our own destiny. There aren't any upsides from Brexit, are there? All doom and gloom, we're all going to hell in a handcart,aren't we? By the way, you never told me how old you were following your previous infantile outbursts.

You draw your own conclusions. I'm not remotely interested in what they are.

And so it begins, the project fear re-run. Loony Treasury forecasts, B of E Governor Carney wetting himself again, BBC news full of doom and gloom about the consequences of leaving without a deal. We will have to put up with this constant establishment propaganda until the so-called meaningful vote in the Commons in a couple of weeks time,whilst May frantically hits the airwaves and tours the country pleading for support for her ridiculous sell-out to her beloved EU.

No.

Scared of what, exactly, sonny?