Batman

who is going to be the first to say that accepting violence like this brings us down to his level?

I think it's just a bit of fun

That was quite good.

Mate, why have you turned into an complete helmet?

depends on how MP wants to play and the money involved. I can see us playing a 433 next season. move out ramirez and get in Banega (maybe) throw in another striker, wide player and bobs your uncle

need broad to get a few here. need 320+ really

same person

that is true. The russians are more aggressive towards us than ay any time in the last 20+ years just never read/talked about anymore

what do you mean? only 2 nations in the EU have such capability and already work together?

How come little is made when, for example so called equal rights are skewed in the female favour Look at the prize money at Wimbledon.

I will add. all well and good saying this system is a relic yet, more and more nations are advancing theirs, adopting new variants of this or just buying it off the russians. so, not really a 'relic' is it whether we should have it another question https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/27378/DefenceWhitePaper2006_Cm6994.pdf

this is true. it will be new technology for the UK and will cost vast sums of money (and may not even work too well) the site where they are based, say Neptune will STILL be set up to house nuclear missiles, so no change there. the cost of astutes are more than the Vanguard class submarines to build in actual fact With that. having a mixy-blob of a kind of nuclear tipped missile. the threshold of their use is far lower than unleashing hell on earth (or the threat of) The boats will STILL act like the current vanguard class in that they go on patrol (somewhere), come back. go into maintenance and go back out. you will lose the ability to strike anywhere in the world of your chosing with nuc tipped missiles. the only missile that could be nuke tipped are TOMAHAWKS. they are not sub-sonic. they are easily tracked on radar, the are low flying and the range is limited compared to a trident. They are infact a great deal easier to shoot down than you think. if you want a nuclear system for the UK. a continuation of the current 4 boat system is the most viable/cheapest option to have a credible force. and that is not me being biased as I have never served on one do not wish to. is it a fact

nuke tip missiles are simply not the answer either have proper nuke capability or none at all

i think you are a bunch of helmets

110 is actually glasgow saint

titus bramble not wanted by west ham then?

ask bournemouth fans sleeping on the streets to pay £60 for the madrid friendly

depends what paper you read. its a debate where no one will ever concede defeat or change their opinion

IF and it a big IF..the Government want a credible replacement. The 4 boat submarine trident system is the cheapest and/or most practicle for the job. having a round the clock system that is

Maybe it is Banega which will mean,gaston will be played in a wide role?

Who?

I was just going to bed. ffs

I thought they did 18-30s there,

If Chelsea get Rooney. Then maybe