sadoldgit

You can see where Elon gets it from. https://www.independent.co.uk/tv/news/elon-musk-tommy-robinson-keir-starmer-prime-minister-b2674961.html

I guess so. Maybe they have said, depending on who goes, a loan or two might be possible further down the line?

And you really are a piece of work too. If you had put money on me searching for Jewish grooming gangs you would have lost it. The reason we know so much about Asian grooming gangs is because they are been through the system and are in jail. I know that you are your fellow forum Muslim haters don’t get it, but it is very apparent that you get yourselves more worked up about Muslims when they do anything illegal than you do for non Muslims. How many times did Delldays/Batman post about non Muslims child abusers? How much time have you and your like spent posting about the child sexual abuse by the Christian churches (and very long term cover ups)? Remind me just how many times Musk has tweeted about the sexual abuse in Christian organisations? Where are all the threads on here (I know of one because I actually started it!). There has already been a national enquiry into child sex abuse in this country. It took 7 years to complete and is very comprehensive. Why do we need another one? Instead of having a go at Starmer and Jess Phillips, perhaps Musk should be asking the previous Tory government why they didn’t implement any of the recommendations (not that it has got anything to do with him anyway)? Musk is a great advocate for free speech because it enables him to spread lies, disinformation and make mischief. Sadly he has an audience who swallow it hook line and sinker. Let’s just focus on Muslims shall we, it isn’t as if it is a much wider issue. Sexual abuse is sexual abuse. It doesn’t become worse if it is carried out by someone of a Muslim persuasion.

Well they certainly aren’t going to be from right leaning sources are they! I was working in the Criminal Justice System during that period and if there was a conspiracy not to bring certain ethnic types to justice you would think that we would have known about it.

Apologies if this has been mentioned earlier but I have just read that the club are having a meeting tomorrow (7 days after the transfer window slammed open) to discuss transfers. Tomorrow? It begs the questions why not sooner and also why weren’t they a part of the managerial appointment discussions? It was pretty obvious on Juric’s appointment that we were going to be relegated so you would like to think that the options about how we approached the second half of the season with a view to competing in the Championship next season would already have taken place. It seems to me though that what is considered “dead wood” currently (for example BBD) would be very useful next season so who do you actually get rid of now?

Hypochondriac needs to read the whole of these articles. He probably won’t because he would rather just post laughing emojis than engage his brain. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65174096.amp https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-63307015.amp https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2020/dec/analysis-new-home-office-report-admits-grooming-gangs-are-not-muslim-problem

If I remember correctly the enquiries didn’t find that these people were not brought to book over fear of accusations of cover ups. It was more to do with incompetence within the police and social services. The last government had 14 years to deal with child sexual abuse. It is a scandal that the findings of a seven year enquiry have yet to be implemented. When Musk fails, as do a few posters on here, is that the problem is far wider than Asian gangs. It has been a problem within the Christian church for hundreds of years. It is a problem in the home where children are abused by family members. Predators predate. These people are opportunists and will operate where ever they find the opportunity. By just focussing on the Asian rape gangs not only is Musk ignoring the wider problem, he is also displaying his racist tendencies. Musk is not a “hero” as dubbed by Musk. He is ignorant and bigoted. Even his statement about Farage is wrong. Without Farage Reform would be now where. He attracts like minded people like a magnet and he is also now drawing in people around the edges because he is playing the populist card á la Trump. Like Trump, he knows just what buttons to press and what types of red meat works. Reform is the far right of the Tory Party trying to dress itself up as a sheep. Put a less divisive leader in place of Farage and you might as well just stick with the Tories.

You have to feel sorry for the poor love. With the forum being down for a few days and no one to stalk he would have had to put a full shift in at work and spend time with his family instead of spending his time trolling on the internet.

As you will know well, I support neither of them one iota. I suspect that Farage is only trying to distance himself from Robinson because he feels that he will be sullied by Tommy’s thuggish reputation.

You beat me to it. https://metro.co.uk/2025/01/02/suella-braverman-bizarrely-claims-a-land-border-italy-turkey-22284132/amp/

Poor Nigel! https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/nigeln-farage-elon-musk-reform-b2674035.html

Whereas you bend over backwards trying to find someone not racist because, apparently, he only hates Muslims. You have an issue with Scientology. Do you also have issues with the ideology of the National Front and the English Defence League? Robinson has been heavily involved in both organisations. Experts in this field (not keyboard warriors on a football forum) who deal with these issues day in, day out, say that he is racist. Any time anyone displays any animosity towards Muslims, no matter what their backgrounds, you find a way to play down their hate. By the same token, you tell us your Muslim uncle is wrong when he tells you that people should not take his prophet in vain. You cut Muslim haters slack but not Muslims. Your male is wrong but Tommy is okish because he only hates Muslims. That is what it sounds like from your posts over the years.

With respect you can have views on immigration that are not specifically racist.

Pretty much spot on, a classic narcissist who believes the world revolves around him. He uses the populist playbook - radical conservatism, authoritarianism, ultra nationalism, nativism, chauvinism and xenophobia superbly well because it is all based on on selfishness and narcissists understand that more than anybody else. He uses far right ideology as a trade off. He gives people what they want and in return they inflate his own ego.

The definition of a racist is a person who is prejudiced against or antagonistic towards people on the basis of their membership of a particular racial or ethic group. Tommy Robinson is a racist. Elon Musk is a racist too.

On the basis that we apparently need to have another election already according to the biggest nut job in the US other than Trump, perhaps Musk will also call for another referendum on Brexit using the same argument? https://www.gbnews.com/politics/elon-musk-calls-new-election-britain-labour-support-plummeting

The people who support these champions of the far right either implicitly or otherwise need to be called out for what they are if we aren’t going to end up going down the same road as the US. The Farage bandwagon is already picking up stream and scumbags like Robinson do a lot of his dirty work for him. We have seen it all through history which is in danger of repeating itself in the West. It isn’t so much the people like Farage and Robinson that are the problem. More the gullible that give them credence or those like the people in the US who voted Trump in. The rise of the far right in Europe is very clear but is greeted by laughing emojis by the very people who are allowing it to happen. For the very person who told us on here that “socialism is dangerous” (hypochondriac for those that don’t know) far right politics, and those who support them, pose a far greater threat to us at this time.

More Musk fun https://www.politico.eu/article/elon-musk-uk-backlash-boost-far-right-activist-tommy-robinson/

Thinking about it you have posted in the past that you claimed not to know much about him and it was pointed out to you what a racist scumbag he is. Why are you still pretending that you don’t know much about him and continue to play down his racist views? Even if you struggle with the evidence against him, even you should get an inkling about his tendencies given he led the very racist English Defence League. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Defence_League

Yet you supported him when I posted negative comments about him? Strange behaviour for someone who claimed not to know much about him. Mind you it was the same with Katie Hopkins. If you can be bothered there is plenty of evidence out there proving that he is “unambiguously racist”. I’ll help you out. https://bridge.georgetown.edu/research/factsheet-tommy-robinson/ https://resistinghate.org/yes-tommy-robinson-you-are-a-racist/amp/

Absolutely 😂. Priceless. The point is that we all pay for things that we don’t use anymore. For example, I don’t use the public baths any more but I still pay towards them. I used them in the past. I used to go to school. I don’t any more but I still pay towards them. The BBC is just like that. It is a publicly owned broadcasting institution that is there for all to use as it when it wants, if it wants to. If you chose not to others in your household might want to, or your neighbours, or your relatives in another part of the country. Just like public ally owned swimming baths and schools. It isn’t just Eastenders or Radio 1. It is a publicly owned broadcasting platform that provides us all with a service whether we actually use it or not. Just like swimming baths. We as a society all benefit from things that we use, we use sometimes and things that we never actually use ourselves. The BBC is a part of the fabric of our society along with schools, swimming pools, waste collection, Trident nuclear weapons, street lights etc. Should blind people be exempt from paying towards street lights? Should I be exempt from paying towards nuclear weapons because I don’t agree with them? Would Duckie feel so aggrieved with the BBC if it was more like GB News? The BBC still produces quality programmes. If people choose not to watch them so be it, but it is still an important part of the fabric of this country and provides a service for us all if we want to take advantage of it. Just like swimming pools and other public services. Just like swimming pools, even if we don’t use them ourselves anymore, or never have used them, by paying towards them and their upkeep we are helping to enrich the experiences and opportunities of those in our society. If we all start to insist that we only pay for things that we personally use we end up in a society populated by people like Duckie, hypochondriac and the other usual suspects. Can you imagine what that would be like? If the BBC was funded from our taxes, would people complain as much about paying for it?

It is getting crazier… https://tribune.com.pk/story/2518902/elon-musks-alleged-burner-account-adrian-dittman-exposed-after-using-it-to-defend-himself-on-x?amp=1

The same people that no doubt grew up watching Match of the Day, Top of the Pops, Only Fools and Horses, Monty Python’s Flying Circus, ‘Til Death Do Us Part etc. etc. etc.

The FBI are saying that it is not terror related so that rules out “Islamists”.

😂 https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy53vz1qpx1o.amp He shares the same interest in Pepe Le Frog as another alt right supporter on here it seems.