sadoldgit

You really need to read this thread properly. Also what would be "novel" would be you attacking the racists.

So why bother responding every time I do dearie? Hypo still avoiding the good fight and picking up on posts supporting moderates whilst letting the racist posts go unchallenged. Interesting priorities you have Hypo.

Hi Two Pints, according to a couple of posters here it is a greater crime to defend moderate Muslims than it is to make racists remarks. Go figure.

Got nothing to say about the Islamaphobes then Fry? Talking about fish in a barrel, do they come in your too difficult category? Nice to see you buddy post right after you. You make such a cute couple. Start digging out the people on here that deserve it and you might start gaining some respect instead of continuing your usual trolling behaviour. Neither you nor your partner have taken any of the clear racists on here to task. Why is that? I see to remember you getting all shirty about me not naming names. Well I don't have to because they have outed themselves big time. But you seem to have a bigger problem with someone who says that all Muslims are not to be feared. For someone of your fearsome reputation that shows a particular lack of backbone. I can understand Hypo bottling it by the great CB Fry? Sheesh.

How much of this thread have you read? It would appear that some posters believe that we are at threat from Muslims full stop. Do you have anything to say about the Islamaphobes?

Nope, not big on murder to be honest Whelk.

You don't have to post anything in order to feel superior Hypo.

strolling

For Whelk and Hypo specifically. My response was to the post that said that "They blow people up on a huge scale" etc. There was no part of the post that said he was talking about terrorists. Are you okay with that statement as it stands?

Yes I do. But you seem to think that somehow Belgium shouldn't be including because, and correct me if I am wrong, they haven't been involved in doing nasty things in the Middle East. You asked twice what the Belgiums have done to deserve the bombings did you not?

I (and others) have made the point many many times because it seems that some posters seem to think that we have a problem with all Muslims. Have you not been following the thread?

I see. So you haven't bottled the confrontation with Islamphobic posters then? Hmmm. What part of not all Muslims are terrorists is ill informed Hypo???

I cant recall crossing any border that didn't have controls. Where exactly are we talking about?

I have seen some generalisations in my time but this takes the biscuit. "They." ??? All 1 billion of them???

Pinkos? So you don't think that the West's intervention in the Middle East (thanks to the oil) has anything to do with what is happening at the moment? And if Islam is such a violent religion why are the 1 billion or so Muslims taking to the streets with pitchforks to bring us Infidels to our knees?

No I don't, but Batman seems to have a problem with the attack being carried out in Belgium.

The amount of excuses he has trotted out are breath taking. He doesn't seem prepared to accept any responsibility for his behaviour at all. There are plenty of "arrogant" footballers who do not groom young girls. By his own admission he had plenty of women and cheated on his girlfriend plenty of times. Why then groom a 15 year old? It is a tough sentence but he hasn't done himself any favours.

If we are going to be pedantic, a paedophile is someone who has sex with, or has sexual urges for children who haven't reached puberty yet.

Or maybe they are paying the price for being the capital of the EU?

Another pointless post from Batman backing up his view that we should close our borders. Just a normal day on The Saints Web.

finished

I have been trying to find an appropriate word for those who display religious discrimination. The best so far is religionism but that would then lead to religionist which is a bit rubbish and is also all encompassing. Another more appropriate name might be Islamaphobic as it is specific to a particular religion.

The more men we have in the UK the more potential rapists that live here. That's a fact too. You simply cant go on hanging the acts of a minority on a whole religious creed.

You are right. You cannot "consent" if you are under 16. It is seen as statutory rape if you have sex with someone under 16 even if they agree with the act.

I would answer you but a previous poster has done it much better than I could. I am not sure how you separate Muslims from Islam. Can you separate Christians from Christianity? What about if we separate Muslims from terrorists?