OldNick

Perhaps an individual's choice would be a fair reason

BTF if I recall correctly you said at one time you were a dancer. Now I know it wasn't an exotic dancer but I wonder if your dances had sexual undertones? I recall the coke advert with women looking out of windows at a well toned bloke and the Levi ad. I assume you showed the same disgust to those images, I'm sure it undermined a lot of men who think they were not up to standard. Perhaps that's why so many men are now working out to extremes. Men like visual things, whereas I have read women prefer the mind.

Bloody hel what a bunch of wets. It seems to me half of the posters on here will never get laid or want to. Sex sells and I doubt there is a day when a woman doesn't look at a man and think they would like to lay him and visa versa. The Sun isn't aimed at high brow Guardian readers,it is for the normal bloke in the street who happily looks at the female form. To compare somebody who looks at page 3 to child porn or Saville is bizarre. Look around there is plenty of ads /pics of half dressed men around, we don't notice because it is harmless. I don't get any newspapers BTW

'The Blues have been advertising for Rochon’s replacement in the analysis department.' Do they need an analysis department? Quite easy for anybody to do , 'we were rubbish' 'we were robbed' 'the ref was useless' 'it was the opponents cup final' After each game they only have to cut and paste one of those...job done

its because you played for the wrong side. My team really enjoyed scoring, but they were a team

[quote=pap;2120456 well put Pap. The gang go for the man yet again.

is that the Palm, Monaco, or Miami? Or from a photo album of a East European party member of the 1970's

Very promising, he looked an intelligent and very useful addition to the squad

We had just drawn at Chelsea, it was a get out of jail result, he had mistakenly put RL on the bench and only when he was brought on did he turn the result. NA did very well for us, but only to a level. I wish him luck in his future jobs, his judgement was poor accepting the Reading job, he was better than that .

Shearer was having real trouble holding back the glee that we had lost at least 4 players for Saturday at his beloved Newcastle

perhaps if Victor had been playing at full tilt and not ambling about (he really didnt look interested) he may not have suffered the injury

I was disappointed, I thought wer could have pushed on and scored more. Generally our passing was sloppy and had Ipswich shown real cup fighting bottle and got the ball in the box we would have struggled. I doubt there was a neutral who would think we were a top side and probably wonder what all the fuss is about. Yes it was a clinical display but boring and frustrating as hell

Disappointing display, but got the result. I would be more disappointed if i was an Ipswich fan as they were next to useless. Our midfield was very in expereinced and they controlled it.

I think the club physio is leading you astray. Jrod is going to be playing with the under21's in about a fortnight. That came from the horses mouth

i saw on TV the other day that there a an exhibition in the US where they were selling such things. The terrorists have access to massive funds buying a load of these is not a problem to them

There goes Steves house!

Apparently he will be with the under 21s playing in a fortnight

the picture on your avatar brings back memories. Is it me or are the modern images of match action boring compared to such pictures? I recall the picture but cant remember what game it is from, was it a Bolton cup match??

you should also mention that the kit man put Forsters gloves and kit straight back into the kitbag as they dont need washing.

ithink you should change the image, that is a very valuable tin pot!!! true story

Apologies, I have looked back and you did indeed answer me

Yet another who feels that their opinion is always right that they feel they can bandy around derogatory insults.

but it is not logical or fair. The fair way is to have it as an option of 10% (something that we have to provide) and if the club does not wish to take the option up they give the go ahead to sell to their fans. Again, if for example we had a must win game against our nearest rivals at the end of a season, if they came to us they would have the backing of 10% of the ground compared to us going to theirs we would have 5% or less, potentially giving them an unfair advantage. If you think that is logical or fair no wonder we have trouble seeing eye to eye.

it would help if you answered questions put to you. i asked a question of you earlier in the thread and you didnt but went back to the same old thing. I do wonder if actually stating something that may in time seem to be wrong, worries you or you cant face of being proved wrong. it is a forum of opinions and it is not a crime or any shame to be wrong.

yes, is that fair? A level playing field would be the option of 10% wherever. If we could decide to just give 5% of tickets as per Man U etc it would be easier to have a proper singing home end