Jump to content

OldNick

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    25,009
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by OldNick

  1. Ron its not seeing the light, I have been anti/sceptical about Jan from day 1. I have said since xmas that RL must get rid of Jan or I could not support any thing he does. Wotte is not the way out of this IMO and whilst I would love to be wrong I dontr think it will take any pressure off the lads.
  2. An investor who really thinks about the club first.Im in business and understand your sentiments but seeing that people who could act now are waiting for thing s to get worse before acting are not a step forward
  3. trading in Baldrick with the village idiot, good stuff.I hope Im proved wrong, but this appointment will not quell the awful scenes that we had during Doncaster nad future home ugames.We needed somebody to inspire and nullify the unrest Wotte will not do that
  4. Well thye are not thinking of the clubs well beeing first.Thinking like theirs will give us no respite from the rubbish we have put up with for some years.
  5. Im sorry I have been very understanding but replacing Jan with Wotte is like replacing Baldrick with the village idiot. from the little i know of Wotte he like Hoddle would eat himself if he was made of chocolate. Not a step forward and sadly I cannot support this appointment. Wotte like Jan does not have experience in this league. I have to hope my thoughts are wrong but on this occasion I fear the worst.
  6. Morph then your friends in Itchen centre are complete nkobs as they are watching while Rome burns.Please do not tell me they are better for our club if they are sitting on the sidelines doing nothing. It is obvious that any regime would be welcomed with open arms at this time and dont need to see this regime fail as patently it is failing by not acting decisivily on the manager front. .If you put faith into people like that we are going from bad to worse. What more do they want? murders on the pitch before they decide to put the money where thier mouth is. I'm already losing interest in them
  7. His wife allegedly had not settled and wanted to go back to Holland.Combined with the fans turning it had to happen. I feel a little guilty that I was part of hte thousands who turned agaianst a good man, but the club is bigger than anyone
  8. well I would wouldnt I being a PR plant
  9. Pompey cranking it up.I wonder if the local police will be arresting fans for the abuse they give out to ND.
  10. WGS has a wonderful gift of motivating players as well as him getting sides fit. I didnt like many of his signings especially in his latter days with us.I still would haqve him back like a shot. Jones is probably the best judge of a footballer we have had for a log time and Hoddle had the benifit twice of organising the squads he left
  11. Whats unfair? I and all on here I suspect would jump at the chance to have WGS back. It was just during convesation that it occured to us how thin in qua;lity the squad was and that WGS did leave a few duffers
  12. I think you will find he was bought just before WGS came to us and so that is why he said it was a Cooper signing. Phillips was a classy player and I cant fathem why he didnt settle.His wife did of course
  13. well Im a PR plant and so there must be an ulterior motive mustn't there.Lol
  14. agree with that but when you se what squad we were left with it was mediocre. Especially as we were the early victims of Ambramovic stealing Bridge away which was the catalyst of our spiral down IMO
  15. I dont wish to seem critical of him, because if he was still here we would still be PL, but I was trying to rack my brains who he brought to the club and when the few names I could recall they werent that good. Killer Iam certain was bought pre WGS and of course as WGS said in his book it was RL who bought Niemi as he wasnt sure.
  16. I was talking to another fan yesterday and we started talking about the heady days of WGS and post the cup final.I think a lot of WGS and loved his quips and getting the best out of ordinary players.We said about the money not being invested and then recalled that WGS bought McCann for 1.75m. We then tried to recall who else he bought that left us a decent squad. I can't think who else he brought to the club who turned out any good.Now of course RL/board may have something to do with that, but the real star players of the successful-relegation season were purchased before and after his tenure.ie Crouch, BT, Killer. Sorry I forgot Niemi. We were left with Telfers and McCanns. Iam not blaming WGS it is just something that occured when his name and the last good years came up in conversation.
  17. Dont take it to heart.The majority respect and appreciate what you lot do. If you lot withdrew your labour the games/Northam would have to be closed, people who are wanting to get a trophy should remember that.
  18. very much part of LM's crew.
  19. this all so reminds me of David brent in the Office when the new lad arrived and knew a load more than he did and so kept coming back with bits about the Russian novelist.LOL
  20. Above HR?? considering what he did and he took training at Stoneham with the rest of the Pompey team and nothing happened i doubt anything would do so with RL> Anyway its not right to do so anyway.
  21. one sided and bigotted inside perspective??? though.
  22. Ump you might not realise it but I DO respect what you say even though we do seem at different poles on things. In respect of the PA thing too many at the top have voiced that he was there and during the AGM Rl allowed Jones to say about it without correcting it.I doubt that Rl didnt know what he was to say either. The guy you talk about may have added to the rumours that i dont know but I again say that MC flying especially to meet a contact to resurrect the deal and other little pieces I dont wish to put up makes me believe. If RL had been the man in charge of the deal, would the fans have been so understanding and prepared to say 'He wasn't there.' or would it have been he was 'too greedy, and f####'d it up' My understanding was that the club dithered as 1 party didnt wish to lose their longstanding family ties to the club and another for other reasons. PA/agents couldnt be bothered to get embroiled in it, rightly expecting to be welcomed withopen arms. Now of course I may be wrong, but boy if the club have missed the biggest opportunity in our history they have done us a major disservice.The real truth may not come out for a long time, but until then it will take a lot for me to change my mind. As i said i heard from too many at the time and since from both sides of our board he was interested.
  23. I can see what you are saying and from our standpoint it is correct, but from RL's I expect he is so single minded that he would see it as Jan not being quite up to it.I doubt he wouod ever see it as a resigning issue as manager get changed in all areas of industry and the CEO doesnt resign. In fact i dont recall a chairman ever resigning on the back of a bad managerial appointment.Some people are successful at some clubs not at others. You wishing for too much if you think RL will resign over the manager.
  24. And whose purpose is that to serve then ? There are many scenarios I would think of for him to give that a go ahead, most to be wide of the mark I suspect but if RL wants it to be commonly known it will be for a reason.
  25. I respect your opinion UMp but I have heard that he was from too many close to the deal to agree with you.Your scoffing (although not as scathing as normal, you're going soft mate) will serve the old board well. they came away unscathed and to my surprise it dissapted without a whimper.I put it down to us Saints fans always expecting to be let down.
×
×
  • Create New...