Weston Saint

I have now been told the link between Pinnacle and Matt. I know someone who is close to Pinnacle and he confirms they are the genuine article. Think we should just leave them alone to get on with things. As Samuel Johnson said (no he is not a bidder or a poster ) "When speculation has done its worst, two and two still make four"

Lowe is not involved

That worries me too Tris. Mention of LeTiss is made, it reaches the media pretty quickly and suddenly this forum is alive with direct quotes. I am fairly convinced the Pinnacle connection is genuine but until I hear that a proper bid document has been filed with the Administrator I will remain slightly sceptical. The interested party with a bid in has remained off any forums and is not known to the media. "They" seem to be dealing with the matter in the correct way so far and appear ahead of the others.

No idea why they are so far behind Si.

It is not there offer, I assure you. I am not taking notice of the media.

Careful, you are accusing him of malpractice.

Lancelot link is monkeying around (he will understand). I believe he has the ear of Pinnacle and not a bull****ter. It is good they are interested but why the delay? They are behind the game and eating into pre season planning. LL, dont be worried about the guernsey lot. There is a real written bid on the table by someone who has carried out due diligence. They are in the driving seat but I worry they will get impatient and walk away.

Read my post 132 on this thread

I am unaware of any deadline. Certainly no announcement from the Administrator of that fact. Unless you mean that the other interested party has set a Wednesday deadline

No, only one firm offer unless you are including the jokers from Guernsey who wanted to make a cash offer without doing due diligence.

Correct

No pinnacle have not made an offer, do keep up!

Only if the Administrator delays making a decision on the bid already in and they withdraw in frustration.

Correct, the Stewards will not be paid.

Definately not.

I have purposely not asked for the details of the parties behind the money and I am pleased that they want to stay anonymous. That suggests real intent rather that publicity seekers or tyre kickers. I note the email from Tony Lynam particularly "We are aware of Mr Le Tissiers comments to local press, and are pleased to have his support, should I recommend that this purchase goes to completion" That hardly says LeTissier is fronting the bid or part of it. Like I say, Media Hype.

Spence, I am told that they have not completed due diligence yet. They are behind the ball game.

There is only one bid.

I have had my PM off since the Administrator was called in other than for short periods of contact with another forum user who does not have my email address or mobile number. Nothing sinister. I just wanted a bit of privacy

I am guarded because there is one written bid in the hands of the Administrator and he needs to make a decision quick. There is no other bid at present. Hope the party with the bid do not have second thoughts and withdraw leaving us with nothing! My information is that LeTissier will endorse any bid and owner that will take the club forward. I did not get the impression that he favours the alleged other party over any other. Seems media hype is playing it's part

Guarded I would say on behalf of FF and myself.

Don't know

Read it again. The Administrators are considering an offer. He diod not say two offers. He said two groups interested. If one bid so far it is not LeTiss Group, trust me. But the good news is that if Wotte is right and that a bid has been received then we are safe as a club unless it is withdrawn. I think you will find that the Administrator will be waiting to see if any other offers coming in.

"The administrators are considering an offer," Wotte said. "I think there are two groups. The sooner there's a solution the better." This seems to confirm that there is one offer but there are two groups interested. It suggests to me that the "MLT" one is not in yet.

I have not posted much recently being too busy, hence my delay in responding to comments.. I have never said I defend Nineteen Canteen. I have defended his right to post. I have commented when posters just rubbish him without answering the points or just being downright stupid. He has told you we disagree on many points. I will also defend Andrew Cowen's reputation when someone comes on here and says it is a FACT that 19C is Andrew Cowen. AC does not post on this site. Neither has Lowe ever posted (although it seems he got his fingers burned once for employing someone who did the pr posting for him). Leon Crouch has never posted. Dave Jones is alleged to have posted for a short while some time back. We all know about Michael Wilde's postings. Lee Hoos read the forum regularly during his period as COE and made one or two posts with general opinions on Football but nothing controvercial. We might get some good news soon (runs away and hides before the flack comes)