badgerx16 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: You’re correct in what you are saying....... Not sure why Osvaldorama thought it was funny.
badgerx16 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: However, now the Home Office knows about him, it is refusal and straight out. No appeals process neccessary as he’s already got the French conviction of over 12 months on record. You would hope so.
Gloucester Saint Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 7 minutes ago, badgerx16 said: Not sure why Osvaldorama thought it was funny. Who on earth knows why - not even sure he does. As for the smuggler, get a police van and Home Office out to Leicestershire tonight (if he hasn’t gone to ground), cuff him for the UK offences he’s committed since he snuck in, and the Home Office can tell him his asylum outcome on the way to the airport on a one way trip. His expensive lawyer will go nuts but there’s nothing he can do about it. And if the authorities say it can’t happen that quick, some of my family are ex-police and it can and has happened like that. Edited 3 hours ago by Gloucester Saint
aintforever Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago AI’s take on it: Following Brexit, the UK permanently lost real-time access to the Second Generation Schengen Information System (SIS II). This database contains millions of alerts on criminals, missing persons, and suspected terrorists. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] The primary effects on UK law enforcement and border security include: Loss of Real-Time Intelligence: UK police and border forces no longer receive instantaneous alerts, as they did prior to the UK's exit. Instead of checking a single database, the UK has had to rely on the Interpol I-24/7 network. [1, 2] Database Delays: Because of the loss of SIS II, EU countries are required to upload critical information twice: once into SIS II and once into Interpol. If EU authorities fail to perform this extra step, criminals can cross borders into the UK entirely undetected. [1, 2] Sluggish Investigations: While the UK secured automated exchanges for DNA, fingerprints, and vehicle registration through the UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement, the inability to track foreign fighters and wanted suspects in real-time has been highlighted by the UK Parliament Justice and Home Affairs Committee as a major operational decline. [1, 2, 3] Future Systems: The UK government has been actively developing the International Law Enforcement Alerts Platform (I-LEAP) to speed up Interpol information retrieval, though UK Parliament Committeesreport that finding a substitute for the speed of SIS II remains challenging. [1, 2] You can read the full House of Lords Committee Findings or explore the UK in a Changing Europe analysis for more detailed operational statistics. [1, 2] Well done Nige 👏👏👏👏 1
Weston Super Saint Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, badgerx16 said: But they do not have "diirect, real time access to Interpol's global criminal databases.... ". You'll have to argue that with Interpol as they claim they do... https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Databases National police can search our databases in real time as part of their investigations.
ecuk268 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 4 hours ago, Osvaldorama said: Free home, 300£ a week in benefits, private security guards patrol the neighborhood 24/7 because the asylum seekers “don’t feel safe”. Where do you get £300 per week from? Edited 1 hour ago by ecuk268 1
badgerx16 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 33 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said: You'll have to argue that with Interpol as they claim they do... https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Databases National police can search our databases in real time as part of their investigations. According to this, ( https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/home-office-major-programmes-accounting-officer-assessments/international-law-enforcement-alerts-platform-i-leap-programme ), the I-LEAP program was instigated to make access to Interpol databases easier post Brexit because we lost access to SIS2 and ECRIS These Interpol systems are not as comprehensive as the services we have lost. From that document it does not seem that the Interpol systems actually hold the same level of criminal records data that ECRIS does, rather it holds specific details on individuals "of interest" ; From the Interpol website....... "Operational databases for first-line checks Travel and identity documents reported as stolen, lost, revoked, invalid or stolen blank; Notices – INTERPOL’s colour-coded system of international alerts or requests for cooperation; Nominal data – personal data and the criminal history of individuals subject to a request for cooperation; Travel documents associated with notices; Stolen motor vehicles and identifiable spare parts; Stolen vessels and engines; iARMS – illicit firearms. " Edited 1 hour ago by badgerx16
Gloucester Saint Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Good https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckg4807pn9lo
The Kraken Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 4 hours ago, Lord Duckhunter said: Complete & utter bollocks. Number one, you think the UK would have grown substantially more than any other EU economy had we remained in Number 2, Nigel wasn’t even an MP let alone PM or chancellor. Whatever happened to the UK economy is down to the Government. Brexit wasn’t an alternative Government, Brexit didn’t have a manifesto, it was just leaving the EU, what happened after that is down to the UK Government. George Galloway’s version of Brexit was entirely different to IDS’ . Nigel’s different than Boris’. The fact you still don’t get it, indicates exactly why your side lost. You just don’t understand, it wasn’t a financial transaction, it was a fundimental principle of accountability . Had Corbyn won in 2017, the country would look totally different than it does now, but people like you would still be banging on about “Brexit” when in fact it would be decisions Corbyn made which would have changed the country . When Burnham faces the inevitable debt crisis, it will be because of decisions The Labour Government have made, not because people thought too much sovereignty was “shared” prior to 2016. This is such pitiful bollocks. Again. Shameless prat. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now