The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?

[Farmer Saint]

35 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

Blimey, were you really expecting anything from the forum punchbag? The bloke is a made up character I think. he never makes sensible replies to anyone or anything. he just tries to be funny, but fails at that also. As likely you know, this is the way of the left. I remember well when the Tories took over after Labour last time, that they blamed Labour for the financial mess the country was it. ALL lefties I knew were all over them for this. But it is OK now for them to use that excuse. The left are chronic hypocrites. They also never listen and as soon as you prove their limited knowledge wrong, they make jokes and berate as they have nothing to say. I have caught out so many on here doing the same thing, then they get nasty when you tie them up in knots. 

For the record, I hate them all and do not consider myself right or left. None of them give a flying fook about the masses. To believe they do is to be an idealistic teenager, which most lefties are. 

I've never seen you get close to even making a decent point, let alone tying anyone up in knots.

However, I'm not sure if you make up scenarios to prove your point though as was admitted to have happened above?

Edited 9 hours ago by Farmer Saint

[east-stand-nic]

22 minutes ago, tdmickey3 said:

No need to reply to you, you are making a complete fool of yourself, to save you more embarrassment I won’t add to it 

Test book left again. No reply. Cannot reply. More waffle. Utter brain-dead fool. 

[badgerx16]

2 hours ago, east-stand-nic said:

Test book left again. No reply. Cannot reply. More waffle. Utter brain-dead fool. 

Mirror, mirror.

[tdmickey3]

2 hours ago, east-stand-nic said:

Test book left again. No reply. Cannot reply. More waffle. Utter brain-dead fool. 

 Conspiracy theorist and deranged ladyboy waffles again

[Sir Ralph]

6 hours ago, tdmickey3 said:

No need to reply to you, you are making a complete fool of yourself, to save you more embarrassment I won’t add to it 

Yes buddy of course. Try in engage in adult talk and that’s what you’ve got. That’s it - no intelligent response just that. Embarrassing. Give a half decent response other wise the default is you are a 15 year old playing Fortnite in their boxers living with the ‘rents - at best. Pathetic. First time I have ever engaged with chat on this forum and the ones that jump to response within 2 mins (I suspect unemployed) have absolutely no idea about commercial reality. Probably never made money or invested . Yet they want a seat at the table of debate. 

Edited 3 hours ago by Sir Ralph

[Sir Ralph]

4 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

Yes buddy of course. Try in engage in big boy talk and that’s want you’ve got. That’s it - no intelligent response just that. Embarrassing. Give a half decent response other wise the default is you are a 15 year old playing Fortnite in their boxers living with mummy 

 

2 hours ago, tdmickey3 said:

 Conspiracy theorist and deranged ladyboy waffles again

That’s more words than usual - did you download Chat GBT this time? Did you get parental allowance to download the app?

Edited 4 hours ago by Sir Ralph

[Sir Ralph]

6 hours ago, Farmer Saint said:

I've never seen you get close to even making a decent point, let alone tying anyone up in knots.

However, I'm not sure if you make up scenarios to prove your point though as was admitted to have happened above?

Sorry buddy - law and economic degree - you have no idea about the reality of economics. I’ve met people with amazing degrees from top unis but I’ve never employed them. You’re a pretender with no idea about real modern day finance. I’ve noticed you call everyone else liars but apparently you are legitimate. From what you have said you wouldn’t be near any board that wants to be financially constructive 

Edited 3 hours ago by Sir Ralph

[Gloucester Saint]

15 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

Sorry buddy - law and economic degree - you have no idea about the reality of economics. I’ve met people with amazing degrees from top unis but I’ve never employed them. You’re a pretender with no idea about real modern day finance. I’ve noticed you call everyone else liars but apparently you are legitimate. From what you have said you wouldn’t be near any board that wants to be financially constructive 

I think he was aiming that at Nic…

[Sir Ralph]

42 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

I think he was aiming that at Nic…

I know he was. But I’ve seen him say the same old rubbish to everyone. Why do you defend him so heavily? Please explain as most people can answer their own questions.

Edited 2 hours ago by Sir Ralph

[Gloucester Saint]

32 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

I know he was. But I’ve seen him say the same old rubbish to everyone. Why do you defend him so heavily? Please explain as most people can answer their own questions.

Wasn’t aware that I did tbh. Like most on here, @Farmer Saint included, I agree with some posts and not with others, but I try to rationalise why I do/don't. Sometimes people will agree with my response, sometimes they won’t. And sometimes I find I agree with people on football but less on non-football and vice versa.

First league win since February - enjoy it!

[whelk]

8 hours ago, east-stand-nic said:

Blimey, were you really expecting anything from the forum punchbag? The bloke is a made up character I think. he never makes sensible replies to anyone or anything. he just tries to be funny, but fails at that also. As likely you know, this is the way of the left. I remember well when the Tories took over after Labour last time, that they blamed Labour for the financial mess the country was it. ALL lefties I knew were all over them for this. But it is OK now for them to use that excuse. The left are chronic hypocrites. They also never listen and as soon as you prove their limited knowledge wrong, they make jokes and berate as they have nothing to say. I have caught out so many on here doing the same thing, then they get nasty when you tie them up in knots. 

For the record, I hate them all and do not consider myself right or left. None of them give a flying fook about the masses. To believe they do is to be an idealistic teenager, which most lefties are. 

You ok mate? Been skipping your medication perchance?

[whelk]

1 hour ago, Sir Ralph said:

Sorry buddy - law and economic degree - you have no idea about the reality of economics. I’ve met people with amazing degrees from top unis but I’ve never employed them. You’re a pretender with no idea about real modern day finance. I’ve noticed you call everyone else liars but apparently you are legitimate. From what you have said you wouldn’t be near any board that wants to be financially constructive 

Are you one of these cunts on Netflix documentaries “selling blah blah” where you come across as some shallow insecure fucker worried about how white your teeth are, on the misapprehension that you actually have any skills that people need?

[Farmer Saint]

2 hours ago, Sir Ralph said:

Sorry buddy - law and economic degree - you have no idea about the reality of economics. I’ve met people with amazing degrees from top unis but I’ve never employed them. You’re a pretender with no idea about real modern day finance. I’ve noticed you call everyone else liars but apparently you are legitimate. From what you have said you wouldn’t be near any board that wants to be financially constructive 

Sigh - I don't think this is going anywhere.

Edited 1 hour ago by Farmer Saint

[Sir Ralph]

1 hour ago, whelk said:

Are you one of these cunts on Netflix documentaries “selling blah blah” where you come across as some shallow insecure fucker worried about how white your teeth are, on the misapprehension that you actually have any skills that people need?

I have a business to run and a lot of other responsibilities than to engage  with people using language like that. I have respect and it shows your character as a human being if you talk to people like that. I refuse to engage with people who talk like this. Whelk is a sad reflection of society. Small man - big keyboard.Be better. Goodbye. 

Edited 48 minutes ago by Sir Ralph

[Sir Ralph]

1 hour ago, Farmer Saint said:

Sigh - I don't think this is going anywhere.

So it’s ok to call people a c bomb? I expect that’s ok during your “board meetings”? Direct question is it respectful to call people c bombs? 

 

1 hour ago, Farmer Saint said:

 

Edited 52 minutes ago by Sir Ralph

[Farmer Saint]

10 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

So it’s ok to call people a c bomb? I expect that’s ok during your “board meetings”? Direct question is it respectful to call people c bombs? I will call you out on this. I agree we disagree but there are levels you don’t stoop to as a respectable person having a debate

 

 

Sorry, who did I call a "c bomb"?

The problem you have is you've come on here playing the big "I am", telling everyone they know nothing about economics, whilst also displaying a horrendous grasp of economics and tax law. You've also admitted to lying about the examples you're coming up with about people moving to Dubai (I'm still waiting on how they are saving tax when all their assets and businesses are in the UK, which was the reason you said they were moving).

Whelk has a very cultured way with words when he wants to. He is not stupid, and he is not a chav. However, he does not tolerate a fool. Unfortunately you have ventured into that territory.

Edited 47 minutes ago by Farmer Saint

[Sir Ralph]

17 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said:

Sorry, who did I call a "c bomb"?

The problem you have is you've come on here playing the big "I am", telling everyone they know nothing about economics, whilst also displaying a horrendous grasp of economics and tax law. You've also admitted to lying about the examples you're coming up with about people moving to Dubai (I'm still waiting on how they are saving tax when all their assets and businesses are in the UK, which was the reason you said they were moving).

Whelk has a very cultured way with words when he wants to. He is not stupid, and he is not a chav. However, he does not tolerate a fool. Unfortunately you have ventured into that territory.

Seriously I can’t explain future tax constraints again to you. You might say your online friend is a business or cultural expert. He isn’t. Neither are you. 
 

i won’t engage any more with people who think it’s acceptable to use that type of language. Goodbye and good luck with bringing Woolworths back to life - with government subsidy I believe in you x

Edited 30 minutes ago by Sir Ralph

[Farmer Saint]

12 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

Seriously I can’t explain future tax constraints again to you. You might say your online friend is a business or cultural expert. He isn’t. Neither are you. 
 

i won’t engage any more with people who think it’s acceptable to use that type of language. Goodbye and good luck with bringing Woolworths back to life - with government subsidy I believe in you x

That's the third time you've changed your reply. Want to try again?

[Sir Ralph]

7 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said:

That's the third time you've changed your reply. Want to try again?

Mate I’m on holiday which is what I’ve had the time to engage with you. Enjoy the rest of your “board advice” - I hope it goes well and your parents make sound investments

Edited 19 minutes ago by Sir Ralph

[Farmer Saint]

Just now, Sir Ralph said:

Mate I’m on holiday which is what I’ve had the time to engage with you. Enjoy the rest of your “board advice” - I hope it goes well

How sad.

[Sir Ralph]

1 minute ago, Farmer Saint said:

How sad.

Up the saints x

[Gloucester Saint]

20 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

i won’t engage any more with people who think it’s acceptable to use that type of language. Goodbye and good luck with bringing Woolworths back to life - with government subsidy I believe in you x

How do you think Nissan at Sunderland, Honda at Swindon and Toyota in Derbyshire appeared as UK plants during the 1980s?

Hint - it was through considerable subsidy from the Thatcher government. Which was the right decision and thing to do btw.

SMEs win tens of millions in R&D grants to help prove concepts for new products and services to sell to market from Innovate UK. Sometimes partnering with universities and colleges, sometimes not.

And plenty of companies were happy to take subsidies to stay afloat during Covid and have a duty to repay the taxpayer during the rest of this decade for keeping the roof over their heads so they keep our roads and infrastructure running.

[Sir Ralph]

Just now, Gloucester Saint said:

How do you think Nissan at Sunderland, Honda at Swindon and Toyota in Derbyshire appeared as UK plants during the 1980s?

Hint - it was through considerable subsidy from the Thatcher government. Which was the right decision and thing to do btw.

SMEs win tens of millions in R&D grants to help prove concepts for new products and services to sell to market from Innovate UK. Sometimes partnering with universities and colleges, sometimes not.

And plenty of companies were happy to take subsidies to stay afloat during Covid and have a duty to repay the taxpayer during the rest of this decade for keeping the roof over their heads so they keep our roads and infrastructure running.

Up the saints x

[Farmer Saint]

3 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

How do you think Nissan at Sunderland, Honda at Swindon and Toyota in Derbyshire appeared as UK plants during the 1980s?

Hint - it was through considerable subsidy from the Thatcher government. Which was the right decision and thing to do btw.

SMEs win tens of millions in R&D grants to help prove concepts for new products and services to sell to market from Innovate UK. Sometimes partnering with universities and colleges, sometimes not.

And plenty of companies were happy to take subsidies to stay afloat during Covid and have a duty to repay the taxpayer during the rest of this decade for keeping the roof over their heads so they keep our roads and infrastructure running.

I think if we ignore him he might just go away...I'm surprised he's still here in all honesty as he's thoroughly embarrassed himself.

If I were him I'd take the loss and go back to enjoying his "holiday".

[Sir Ralph]

7 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said:

I think if we ignore him he might just go away...I'm surprised he's still here in all honesty as he's thoroughly embarrassed himself.

If I were him I'd take the loss and go back to enjoying his "holiday".

Up the saints @Farmer Saint  @tdmickey3 @Gloucester Sainthave a great weekend. Life is diversity of opinion and ultimately it doesn’t matter too much. Enjoy the summer and hopefully Will Still does the business 

Edited 1 minute ago by Sir Ralph