Toadhall Saint Posted August 29 Posted August 29 11 hours ago, Barsiem said: Not strictly Hampshire related but Vince has had an absolute mare in the Hundred this year. Most innings he hasn't even got into double figures. He’s been rubbish tbh. Pity really as my nipper thinks he’s the bees knees. was sat in front of a couple of people discussing the one day result yesterday and they thought it wasn’t on bringing Daws and Fuller back in for the 50 over game - not in the spirit of things. 1
Window Cleaner Posted August 29 Author Posted August 29 2 hours ago, Toadhall Saint said: He’s been rubbish tbh. Pity really as my nipper thinks he’s the bees knees. was sat in front of a couple of people discussing the one day result yesterday and they thought it wasn’t on bringing Daws and Fuller back in for the 50 over game - not in the spirit of things. Well, those people are entitled to their opinion but without Daws,Fuller we wouldn't have won yesterday as likely as not. Hundred players who've finished their stint or aren't required are available according to the rules. I would stop at just playing them in the final though but if they've played in the campaign then they've earned their place. What is more we're really a bit short of players without them. Vince on sunday, doubt it don't think he's contracted for anything but the T20 with us. But I expect Albert and Dawson to play on sunday, must be a toss up between Fuller and Barker though. For me, the side for sunday is: Orr,Gubbins,Middleton,Albert, Dawson, Brown (or Fuller) Mayes,Barker;Abbott,Neal and Jack. 2
stevegrant Posted August 29 Posted August 29 Fuller played a couple of the group stage games, so there's nothing untoward with him being picked IMO. Dawson is a little bit more on the sly side, but if he's available and willing, there's nothing inherently wrong with it. Bit unfortunate for whoever misses out to fit him in, but it's a squad game these days. 2
Gloucester Saint Posted August 29 Posted August 29 21 hours ago, Weston Saint said: We play Yorkshire at Scarborough on Sunday in SF The town will be rammed, Scarborough is popular with Yorkies at the best of times.
Picard Posted August 29 Posted August 29 57 minutes ago, stevegrant said: Fuller played a couple of the group stage games, so there's nothing untoward with him being picked IMO. Dawson is a little bit more on the sly side, but if he's available and willing, there's nothing inherently wrong with it. Bit unfortunate for whoever misses out to fit him in, but it's a squad game these days. Anyway they have to fit Dawson in somewhere with all the games he's missing on international duty. I think he would even miss the one day final on Sep 20 if Hants qualify. 2
Toadhall Saint Posted August 30 Posted August 30 On 29/08/2025 at 11:18, Window Cleaner said: Well, those people are entitled to their opinion but without Daws,Fuller we wouldn't have won yesterday as likely as not. Hundred players who've finished their stint or aren't required are available according to the rules. I would stop at just playing them in the final though but if they've played in the campaign then they've earned their place. What is more we're really a bit short of players without them. Vince on sunday, doubt it don't think he's contracted for anything but the T20 with us. But I expect Albert and Dawson to play on sunday, must be a toss up between Fuller and Barker though. For me, the side for sunday is: Orr,Gubbins,Middleton,Albert, Dawson, Brown (or Fuller) Mayes,Barker;Abbott,Neal and Jack. Totally agree with all of that especially if they have played prior to 100 duties. 1
Window Cleaner Posted August 31 Author Posted August 31 (edited) Just seen today's team. Seems very reliant on the openers, if they should go early and cheaply, the dynamic batting looks on the short side. Still dense on the bowling. We're batting first I think. Toss lost. Edited August 31 by Window Cleaner
Window Cleaner Posted August 31 Author Posted August 31 Bugger, Gubbins has chopped on. 8/1. Might be difficult to get a reasonable score here, looks windy.
Window Cleaner Posted August 31 Author Posted August 31 We now look to have a minimal chance of winning. Thought we were short of at least one run scoring batter, looks like it will be that way. 53/3
Andrew Watson Posted August 31 Posted August 31 Packing your side with bowlers is fine if you post a decent total,unfortunately that possibility looks a long way off now.
Window Cleaner Posted August 31 Author Posted August 31 (edited) Brown proving once again that he's not a one-day batter if the bowling is anywhere near decent. Doesn't have the shots to score quickly enough. Out trying to hoik a straight one to the leg side. I might even have gone with Prest instead if Albert isn't available. Edited August 31 by Window Cleaner
Andrew Watson Posted August 31 Posted August 31 Middleton puts himself and the side under too much pressure,he faces far too many dot balls for a number 3 batter. I do get that someone has the sheet anchor role to play.
Window Cleaner Posted August 31 Author Posted August 31 11 minutes ago, Andrew Watson said: Middleton puts himself and the side under too much pressure,he faces far too many dot balls for a number 3 batter. I do get that someone has the sheet anchor role to play. Well perhaps, but to be perfectly fair to the player, I don't think him batting at 3 was in the initial plan for this competition. Should be Prest after Tilly left but he's hopelessly out of form and Weatherly has a broken arm so he's a non-starter as well. We probably counted on Albert being more available as well and at the end of the day perhaps not changing a winning side came into play as well. At the end of the day we've been heavily reliant on the openers, didn't happen today.
Andrew Watson Posted August 31 Posted August 31 Well batted Ben Mayes,a definate star in the making and he could not have had a better mentor at the other end than the brilliant Liam Dawson.
Mixedkebab Posted August 31 Posted August 31 What a stunning innings from Dawson, brilliant. This sort of total looked way out of reach earlier
Window Cleaner Posted August 31 Author Posted August 31 1 minute ago, Mixedkebab said: What a stunning innings from Dawson, brilliant. This sort of total looked way out of reach earlier Good effort from Currie as well, haven't seen him bat much before. That said York's bowling seemed to degrade a fair bit. Perhaps the conditions or the balls or just getting tonked by Mayes,Dawson and Currie.
badgerx16 Posted August 31 Posted August 31 (edited) 130 in 13 overs between Dawson and Currie, the last 5 overs were mental. Daws stepping wide of off stump and playing over fine leg for successive boundaries and scoring at 2 per ball in the partnership.. Edited August 31 by badgerx16
Andrew Watson Posted August 31 Posted August 31 Well that was exceptional from the brilliant Liam Dawson and Scott Currie. Think the game is nw 50/50,the small boundaries and the terrible outfield will make it tough. Would love to eat more humble pie,but I doubt whether the most ardent Hants supporter thought we would end up with 304,after being 78 for 4 off 20 overs. 1
Window Cleaner Posted August 31 Author Posted August 31 (edited) Risk losing this on D/L because Yorks are playing for that. They probably wouldn't match our total but we're not taking the wickets we need to boost our chances. Edited August 31 by Window Cleaner 1
Picard Posted August 31 Posted August 31 Wickets b 49 minutes ago, Window Cleaner said: Risk losing this on D/L because Yorks are playing for that. They probably wouldn't match our total but we're not taking the wickets we need to boost our chances. Wickets beginning to fall. How many neeed to get ahead on dls?
Gloucester Saint Posted August 31 Posted August 31 1 hour ago, Window Cleaner said: Risk losing this on D/L because Yorks are playing for that. They probably wouldn't match our total but we're not taking the wickets we need to boost our chances. We have now, 213/8, 41 needed with 14 balls to go. If Imam was still there, might have still had a chance but not now. Barring a miracle we should be in the final v Worcs. Tight bowling early on helped and Yorks didn’t have the Mayes and Currie contributions around Imam that we had around Dawson. People moan about the 💯 but look at how Currie’s game has come on and a lot of innovation by Dawson as well. Dawson’s knock has to go do down as one of the great Hampshire innings surely? Brilliant to watch him, Mayes then Currie. 1
Window Cleaner Posted August 31 Author Posted August 31 2 minutes ago, Mixedkebab said: Get the fuck in Dawson is a monster, so important Still I hope they give the MoM to Currie. Good knock, bowled well, backed up to run out Ul Haq. Think the second rain delay helped us, reduced their overs and upped the strike rate, went from 7 to over 8. 2
Andrew Watson Posted August 31 Posted August 31 Fantastic win,maybe for once as Scott Currie said, D/L favoured us, but who the hell cares. As for LD, one of the best one day knocks that I have ever seen,especially coming in at 53 for 3,with the top 3 batsmen already out. 1
badgerx16 Posted September 2 Posted September 2 (edited) Sonny Baker's bowling getting murdered by Aiden Markram in the ODI. Edited September 2 by badgerx16
Window Cleaner Posted September 2 Author Posted September 2 25 minutes ago, badgerx16 said: Sonny Baker's bowling getting murdered by Aiden Markram in the ODI. Unsurprising, he's been erratic for Hants, good sometimes and awful on other occasions. Shouldn't pick players on cartoon cricket performance cos a mish-mash of county players is no comparison to South Africa' s XI. 1
Barsiem Posted September 3 Posted September 3 Think England haven't treated him that well in this. He's played very little first class cricket, has been known to be erratic, yet they pick him to play against a top international side and ask him to open the bowling - in the power play - after the England batters had been skittled.... He should be debuting against Ireland if they have to fast track him... Not against SA 1
Window Cleaner Posted Thursday at 09:04 Author Posted Thursday at 09:04 On 03/09/2025 at 09:17, Barsiem said: Think England haven't treated him that well in this. He's played very little first class cricket, has been known to be erratic, yet they pick him to play against a top international side and ask him to open the bowling - in the power play - after the England batters had been skittled.... He should be debuting against Ireland if they have to fast track him... Not against SA Well up to a point. But as there was no way that England were going to win this match it made sort of sense to let him keep plugging away to see if there were any possible grounds to select him at any time in the near future. There are far better and more consistent bowlers available than Baker and I doubt he'll be bowling much in the near future for England, well not against any serious batting side anyway. This was just an old school tie, maybe selection. On a different note, weather at Durham tomorrow doesn't look too bad, bit nippy in the evening perhaps.
Toadhall Saint Posted Thursday at 11:40 Posted Thursday at 11:40 2 hours ago, Window Cleaner said: Well up to a point. But as there was no way that England were going to win this match it made sort of sense to let him keep plugging away to see if there were any possible grounds to select him at any time in the near future. There are far better and more consistent bowlers available than Baker and I doubt he'll be bowling much in the near future for England, well not against any serious batting side anyway. This was just an old school tie, maybe selection. On a different note, weather at Durham tomorrow doesn't look too bad, bit nippy in the evening perhaps. 2 jumpers.😉
Andrew Watson Posted Thursday at 12:12 Posted Thursday at 12:12 Baker is not ready to play international cricket by a long chalk,however he was thrown under the bus by Harry Brook. On a different topic great to see that Kyle Abbott has signed on for next year.
Lighthouse Posted Friday at 17:57 Posted Friday at 17:57 An absolute yard sale in the power play, I've not seen us bat like that in a while. 1
Toadhall Saint Posted Friday at 20:50 Posted Friday at 20:50 20 minutes ago, Lighthouse said: Looks like we're off to Edgbaston again. Aye not bad eh? 1
Andrew Watson Posted Friday at 22:32 Posted Friday at 22:32 Great win,wow those first 6 overs were totally electric. 2
Toadhall Saint Posted Saturday at 09:39 Posted Saturday at 09:39 Just waiting on the membership email - parking booked!
Stu Man Do Posted Sunday at 21:24 Posted Sunday at 21:24 Read that Cartwright is unavailable for finals day which is a pity. Presumably we lose Dawson as well because of England duty?
Andrew Watson Posted Monday at 14:22 Posted Monday at 14:22 Probably a difficult wicket to bat on,but Hants red ball woes are continuing at Hove.
Toadhall Saint Posted Monday at 14:48 Posted Monday at 14:48 25 minutes ago, Andrew Watson said: Probably a difficult wicket to bat on,but Hants red ball woes are continuing at Hove. We’ll find out when Sussex bat.
Dusic Posted Monday at 18:47 Posted Monday at 18:47 Would have been better off picking Cardigan Connor than Tom Prest, who just seems like he can't buy a run.
Barsiem Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago Anyone been watching the stream? Is it terrible conditions, or terrible batting?
Lighthouse Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago Just looked at the BBC score page to see if we'd bowled them out yet. Not only have we bowled them out, we're now seven down in our second innings. I can only assume they've had the rotivator on the wicket instead of the roller.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now