Toadhall Saint Posted June 9 Posted June 9 Good resilience shown at the end! Probably means a draw. in other news the ladies won their blast game inside 16 overs.
Window Cleaner Posted June 10 Author Posted June 10 17 hours ago, Toadhall Saint said: Good resilience shown at the end! Probably means a draw. in other news the ladies won their blast game inside 16 overs. Remains robe seen for the draw. Pitch looks a bit viscious with the new ball. Hants 2 down already.
Hodgey Posted June 10 Posted June 10 Really good result that, dug deep for the draw against a good outfit. Will need that kind of resilience for the rest of the games to have any chance of staying up.
Lee On Solent Saint Posted June 10 Posted June 10 Massive Championship game against Sussex next up. Really need a positive result in that one. 1
Toadhall Saint Posted June 14 Posted June 14 Good win for the ladies yesterday in the 50 over game . Takes them to 2nd in the table.
Picard Posted Sunday at 16:02 Posted Sunday at 16:02 Talking about the ladies the Utilita bowl looked about 10% full for the World cup game yesterday (NZ vs WI). Pretty disappointing especially as it had an exciting finish.
Toadhall Saint Posted Sunday at 20:04 Posted Sunday at 20:04 4 hours ago, Picard said: Talking about the ladies the Utilita bowl looked about 10% full for the World cup game yesterday (NZ vs WI). Pretty disappointing especially as it had an exciting finish. Yep pity as the ticket prices were reasonable
Toadhall Saint Posted Thursday at 10:40 Posted Thursday at 10:40 Another good result in the 50 over ladies game yesterday - won by 10 wickets with 11 overs to spare with a record partnership t boot 1
Window Cleaner Posted Thursday at 11:10 Author Posted Thursday at 11:10 (edited) On 14/06/2026 at 18:02, Picard said: Talking about the ladies the Utilita bowl looked about 10% full for the World cup game yesterday (NZ vs WI). Pretty disappointing especially as it had an exciting finish. Ladies cricket doesn't interest a whole lot of people. Forcing it down people's throats won't change that. In my view there's far too much of it now. Now County Cricket..well there's not enough of it, haven't had a CC or T20 match for seems like ages. Edited Thursday at 11:12 by Window Cleaner
Window Cleaner Posted yesterday at 10:16 Author Posted yesterday at 10:16 Batting first by choice. Wicket looks to have a bit of mean bounce.
Gloucester Saint Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 2 hours ago, Window Cleaner said: Batting first by choice. Wicket looks to have a bit of mean bounce. 84/3. Albert 20, Orr only 3 and Lehmann a rare early perish for 10. Gubbins 48 no, Prest 0 no. One of those wickets where you need to see both side bat on it.
Picard Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago All those winning the toss chose to bat this morning and interestingly a lot of wickets have fallen. For the moment Hants seem to be doing best of the batting teams.(Don't speak too soon!)
Picard Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago Just now, Picard said: All those winning the toss chose to bat this morning and interestingly a lot of wickets have fallen. For the moment Hants seem to be doing best of the batting teams.(Don't speak too soon!) I spoke too soon!
Window Cleaner Posted 20 hours ago Author Posted 20 hours ago I think we given up for the CC season.Poor batting,poor bowling and poor fielding.
Gloucester Saint Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 15 hours ago, Window Cleaner said: I think we given up for the CC season.Poor batting,poor bowling and poor fielding. Three batting points when every other side is in double figures is pathetic. They’re so reliant on Lehmann that when he fails, it all fails. Gubbins at least seems to be on an uptick of form and Prest did better yesterday. And Sussex were missing their two frontline bowlers Robinson and Crocombe! So they got skittled by a fringe attack on a not-too bad deck. Great effort lads! But although the overseas isn’t as useless as Yusuf or Hampton, it’s astonishing that so-called cricket professionals couldn’t spot yet again that we needed a top quality overseas batsman to give our bowlers something to work with. Needs to be a total rebuild next year. Rasmus Ankerson syndrome, massive squad but very few FC calibre players within it. If we don’t, D2 basement looms for many years.
Window Cleaner Posted 4 hours ago Author Posted 4 hours ago 24 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: Three batting points when every other side is in double figures is pathetic. They’re so reliant on Lehmann that when he fails, it all fails. Gubbins at least seems to be on an uptick of form and Prest did better yesterday. And Sussex were missing their two frontline bowlers Robinson and Crocombe! So they got skittled by a fringe attack on a not-too bad deck. Great effort lads! But although the overseas isn’t as useless as Yusuf or Hampton, it’s astonishing that so-called cricket professionals couldn’t spot yet again that we needed a top quality overseas batsman to give our bowlers something to work with. Needs to be a total rebuild next year. Rasmus Ankerson syndrome, massive squad but very few FC calibre players within it. If we don’t, D2 basement looms for many years. Well Lehmann is a top quality overseas batter, just doesn't count as overseas. We have so many holes to patch 2 overseas players isn't anywhere near enough, plus I very much doubt that we have the money to plug all the holes even if it was permitted. Bowling looks weak as well, no-one is going to convince me that, as of yet,Baker is a test bowler,he's so erratic. I have never really understood the persistance with Middleton, Currie Weatherly and even Albert, he looks like a one day slogger. Organ is a waste of time apart from the odd showing once in a blue moon but I suppose at the end of the day it comes down to money. Anyway we need to start over next season in D2 and for me personally thé point of départ is a clean sweep of the coaching staff, all of them, top to bottom. 1
Window Cleaner Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago (edited) Good job we have Abbott. First innings lead of 32. Now, some serious batting is called for. Set them 350 tomorrow tea-time and it might bé interesting. Edited 1 hour ago by Window Cleaner
John B Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I spent the day at the Oval yesterday but although I am a diehard Hampshire supported I am unable to justify Sonny Baker playing for England
Window Cleaner Posted 44 minutes ago Author Posted 44 minutes ago 52 minutes ago, Window Cleaner said: Good job we have Abbott. First innings lead of 32. Now, some serious batting is called for. Set them 350 tomorrow tea-time and it might bé interesting. Pipe dream that, Hants 9/2
Window Cleaner Posted 41 minutes ago Author Posted 41 minutes ago 20 minutes ago, John B said: I spent the day at the Oval yesterday but although I am a diehard Hampshire supported I am unable to justify Sonny Baker playing for England I'd doubt if many could. He's just so erratic. Needs to slow down until he can bowl a regular line. Seems obsessed with bowling at 95 mph, isn't that what his shirt number is about ? 1
Lee On Solent Saint Posted 37 minutes ago Posted 37 minutes ago 5 minutes ago, Window Cleaner said: Pipe dream that, Hants 9/2 Must be so frustrating for Abbot. He's single handedly dragged Hampshire back into the game, then he has to watch the familiar failures of the batsmen again.
John B Posted 36 minutes ago Posted 36 minutes ago 3 minutes ago, Window Cleaner said: I'd doubt if many could. He's just so erratic. Needs to slow down until he can bowl a regular line. Seems obsessed with bowling at 95 mph, isn't that what his shirt number is about ? Sonny Baker currently averages 141 in international cricket. That is the highest average for any England bowler to take at least two international wickets, barring Michael Atherton. His England shirt is 60 he was not that fast yesterday one at 88
John B Posted 35 minutes ago Posted 35 minutes ago 1 minute ago, Lee On Solent Saint said: Must be so frustrating for Abbot. He's single handedly dragged Hampshire back into the game, then he has to watch the familiar failures of the batsmen again. Nothing to do with the wicket then and a dodgy caught behind
Window Cleaner Posted 32 minutes ago Author Posted 32 minutes ago Just now, John B said: Nothing to do with the wicket then and a dodgy caught behind The wicket and the overcast conditions are obviously causing problems. Gubbins should appel against that decision, but then that's not possible in County matchs.
Lee On Solent Saint Posted 2 minutes ago Posted 2 minutes ago 32 minutes ago, John B said: Nothing to do with the wicket then and a dodgy caught behind I think 3 batting points from 7 matches tells you all you need to do know about the batting.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now